Invesco Markets II plc - Invesco FTSE All Share ESG Climate UCITS ETF
Invesco Markets II plc - Invesco FTSE All Share ESG Climate UCITS ETF FASA.L Peers
See (FASA.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FASA.L | £5,838.00 | +0.03% | 4.6B | 17.68 | £3.30 | N/A |
| UC65.L | £59.33 | +1.13% | 5.1T | N/A | N/A | +1.69% |
| UB02.L | £4,403.00 | +1.33% | 3.8T | N/A | N/A | +1.81% |
| IUSA.L | £4,437.50 | +0.12% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +1.08% |
| SSAC.L | £7,048.00 | +0.21% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EQGB.L | £41,587.50 | -0.11% | 976.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,288.00 | -0.12% | 834.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,747.75 | -0.09% | 777.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.75% |
| XESC.L | £7,821.00 | -0.11% | 777.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEUD.L | £22,090.00 | -0.14% | 763.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FASA.L vs UC65.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while UC65.L trades at £59.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to UC65.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs UB02.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while UB02.L trades at £4,403.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IUSA.L trades at £4,437.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while SSAC.L trades at £7,048.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs EQGB.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EQGB.L has a market cap of 976.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while EQGB.L trades at £41,587.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EQGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to EQGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 834.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while SMEA.L trades at £7,288.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XESX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 777.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XESX.L trades at £4,747.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XESC.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 777.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XESC.L trades at £7,821.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 763.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while MEUD.L trades at £22,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IITU.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 743.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IITU.L trades at £2,572.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 694.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while UB0D.L trades at £2,170.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 685.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while JPSR.L trades at £1,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs JT13.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 674.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while JT13.L trades at £597.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 631.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CNAL.L trades at £11,183.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 545.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IWRD.L trades at £6,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 523.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XDAX.L trades at £18,716.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 511.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while PHGP.L trades at £23,425.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 498.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while GLDA.L trades at £9,973.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 479.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XMMS.L trades at £4,715.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 460.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while MXWS.L trades at £9,121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 436.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XMUS.L trades at £13,276.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs UC44.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 421.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while UC44.L trades at £12,702.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 413.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XMEU.L trades at £8,319.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CS51.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 407.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CS51.L trades at £17,092.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs EUE.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 364.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while EUE.L trades at £4,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 360.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IEEM.L trades at £3,449.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs UB32.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 345.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while UB32.L trades at £8,813.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CACX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 337.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CACX.L trades at £6,602.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 303.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while GBSS.L trades at £23,063.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 300.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XSX6.L trades at £11,702.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 300.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while SEMA.L trades at £3,256.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 288.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,294.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while SGBX.L trades at £24,072.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 271B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IWFV.L trades at £3,635.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 251B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while ISPY.L trades at £2,346.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 232.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CEA1.L trades at £14,862.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 222B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while RBTX.L trades at £1,077.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 221.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,238.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs JERE.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 219.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while JERE.L trades at £3,895.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 219.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while JRDE.L trades at £3,655.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs SUES.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 217.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while SUES.L trades at £606.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 213.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while PHSP.L trades at £2,507.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 198.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IUQF.L trades at £1,103.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 194.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while HMEF.L trades at £882.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 193.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IWFM.L trades at £6,539.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 184.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while SOYU.L trades at £317.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 182.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XDEV.L trades at £3,739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 169.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while SPGP.L trades at £1,814.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 169.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CEUR.L trades at £30,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while UIFS.L trades at £1,092.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 164B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XXSC.L trades at £5,495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 156.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,390.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 150.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while PRIR.L trades at £1,491.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while GBSP.L trades at £1,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CU1.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CU1.L trades at £45,887.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 139.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IEFV.L trades at £863.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while ISP6.L trades at £6,469.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IPRP.L trades at £2,705.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs WATL.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while WATL.L trades at £5,801.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs GILS.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while GILS.L trades at £10,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 128.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XZEU.L trades at £2,795.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CUS1.L trades at £38,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XCX6.L trades at £1,321.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs UC79.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while UC79.L trades at £1,134.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs INFL.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while INFL.L trades at £9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while SP5G.L trades at £203.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 63.44. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CSPX.L trades at £640.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CG1.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CG1.L trades at £35,482.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 114.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while 0GWB.IL trades at £469.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CB5.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CB5.L trades at £3,880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XRSG.L trades at £23,194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IJPN.L trades at £1,398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 109.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IGSG.L trades at £5,905.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 109B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while PRIC.L trades at £1,629.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 108.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while JRDM.L trades at £2,348.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while SPEX.L trades at £4,440.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs SPES.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while SPES.L trades at £4,179.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XDEM.L trades at £5,503.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs H50E.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while H50E.L trades at £4,824.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IWDA.L trades at £114.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while RIEG.L trades at £1,432.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IEUX.L trades at £3,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IMV.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IMV.L trades at £5,729.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while DAXX.L trades at £18,270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CSCA.L trades at £17,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while MTIX.L trades at £14,359.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,415.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs UB45.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while UB45.L trades at £6,135.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IUKD.L trades at £835.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XDN0.L trades at £4,242.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs COMM.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while COMM.L trades at £564.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while WQDS.L trades at £548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while EQDS.L trades at £541.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XLKQ.L trades at £52,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CRPX.L trades at £13,099.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while CSP1.L trades at £47,552.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while IGUS.L trades at £13,702.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while XDEB.L trades at £3,580.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.
FASA.L vs INAA.L Comparison
FASA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASA.L stands at 4.6B. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASA.L is priced at £5,838.00, while INAA.L trades at £8,276.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASA.L is less volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASA.L.