Ferro-Alloy Resources Limited
Ferro-Alloy Resources Limited (FAR.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FAR.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAR.L | £8.95 | +5.92% | 45.7M | -8.95 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| BHP.L | £2,057.00 | +2.44% | 104.4B | 15.58 | £1.32 | +4.41% |
| 0R2J.L | £187.99 | +3.58% | 94.4B | 80.27 | £2.34 | +1.03% |
| 0L5V.L | £367.43 | +1.65% | 91.6B | 53.35 | £6.89 | +0.84% |
| 0IFA.L | £279.05 | -1.24% | 79.1B | 72.65 | £3.84 | +0.90% |
| 0L8B.L | £97.73 | +4.52% | 78.7B | 22.11 | £4.42 | +2.95% |
| RIO.L | £4,601.00 | +1.54% | 74.7B | 9.83 | £4.68 | +6.21% |
| 0HBH.L | £295.42 | +1.11% | 65.7B | 29.42 | £10.04 | +2.42% |
| GLEN.L | £294.30 | +0.67% | 35B | -24.52 | -£0.12 | +2.96% |
| 0K9L.L | £149.28 | +4.41% | 34.3B | 5.37 | £27.80 | +1.47% |
Stock Comparison
FAR.L vs BHP.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while BHP.L trades at £2,057.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check BHP.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0R2J.L trades at £187.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 80.27. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R2J.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0L5V.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0L5V.L trades at £367.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 53.35. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0L5V.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0IFA.L trades at £279.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 72.65. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0IFA.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0L8B.L trades at £97.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0L8B.L's competition here
FAR.L vs RIO.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while RIO.L trades at £4,601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check RIO.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0HBH.L trades at £295.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 29.42. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HBH.L's competition here
FAR.L vs GLEN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while GLEN.L trades at £294.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -24.52. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check GLEN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0K9L.L trades at £149.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0K9L.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0Z4C.L trades at £231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0Z4C.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0NHS.L trades at £58.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0NHS.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0KEI.L trades at £112.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0KEI.L's competition here
FAR.L vs AAL.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while AAL.L trades at £2,201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check AAL.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0EDD.L trades at £56.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0EDD.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0UGS.L trades at £39.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -94.58. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0UGS.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R07.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0R07.L trades at £45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 40.36. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R07.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0HQU.L trades at £86.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HQU.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0KXS.L trades at £174.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0KXS.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0LVK.L trades at £87.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0LVK.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0K3B.L trades at £33.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0K3B.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0LJ9.L trades at £54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0LJ9.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0HC7.L trades at £81.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HC7.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0HCB.L trades at £31.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HCB.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0IF3.L trades at £68.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0IF3.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0R0U.L trades at £12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -114.25. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R0U.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0U6C.L trades at £31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0U6C.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0QYN.L trades at £5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QYN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0AHJ.L trades at £16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -27.09. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0AHJ.L's competition here
FAR.L vs S32.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while S32.L trades at £138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check S32.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0VBE.L trades at £30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -198.71. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VBE.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0R0A.L trades at £7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 264.33. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R0A.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0HUR.L trades at £47.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HUR.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0I0H.L trades at £10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0I0H.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0IK3.L trades at £40.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0IK3.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0VGE.L trades at £22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VGE.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0VGM.L trades at £15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 72.96. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VGM.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0L45.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0L45.L trades at £62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0L45.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0VL5.L trades at £41.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VL5.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0QYM.L trades at £10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QYM.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0TWH.L trades at £10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FAR.L has daily volatility of 11.24 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check 0TWH.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0VOA.L trades at £17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VOA.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0R2C.L trades at £7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 78.14. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R2C.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HWG.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0HWG.L trades at £15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HWG.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0VHI.L trades at £16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VHI.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0KW8.L trades at £21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0KW8.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0NZN.L trades at £855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0NZN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0QZ2.L trades at £6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QZ2.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R11.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0R11.L trades at £2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R11.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ADT1.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while ADT1.L trades at £310.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ADT1.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 805M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0G5B.L trades at £126.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0G5B.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 736.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0VIK.L trades at £3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VIK.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R20.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 597.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0R20.L trades at £1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -38.18. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R20.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 557.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0JZT.L trades at £10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -74.64. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0JZT.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 546.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0O6D.L trades at £14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0O6D.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 435.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0KD1.L trades at £3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -36.83. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0KD1.L's competition here
FAR.L vs SOLG.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 428M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while SOLG.L trades at £14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check SOLG.L's competition here
FAR.L vs GFM.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 338.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while GFM.L trades at £184.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check GFM.L's competition here
FAR.L vs KMR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 284.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while KMR.L trades at £322.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check KMR.L's competition here
FAR.L vs PRE.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 253.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while PRE.L trades at £84.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check PRE.L's competition here
FAR.L vs SVML.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while SVML.L trades at £36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check SVML.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 232.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0UYN.L trades at £1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0UYN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0P07.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 220.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0P07.L trades at £0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -19.18. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0P07.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0RRC.L trades at £5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0RRC.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ECOR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 180.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while ECOR.L trades at £72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -24.20. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ECOR.L's competition here
FAR.L vs CAPD.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 179M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while CAPD.L trades at £91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check CAPD.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0V46.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0V46.L trades at £0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0V46.L's competition here
FAR.L vs KP2.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 155.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while KP2.L trades at £3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check KP2.L's competition here
FAR.L vs BSE.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while BSE.L trades at £12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check BSE.L's competition here
FAR.L vs TRR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while TRR.L trades at £48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check TRR.L's competition here
FAR.L vs MKA.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while MKA.L trades at £41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check MKA.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 140.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0VNO.L trades at £1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VNO.L's competition here
FAR.L vs SAV.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while SAV.L trades at £4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check SAV.L's competition here
FAR.L vs JLP.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while JLP.L trades at £3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check JLP.L's competition here
FAR.L vs RBW.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while RBW.L trades at £14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check RBW.L's competition here
FAR.L vs CUSN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while CUSN.L trades at £7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check CUSN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0QVG.L trades at £6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QVG.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0UIK.L trades at £0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0UIK.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0QQR.L trades at £14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QQR.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0R0D.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R0D.L's competition here
FAR.L vs KOD.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while KOD.L trades at £0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check KOD.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0IYS.L trades at £0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0IYS.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ALL.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while ALL.L trades at £8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ALL.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ATM.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while ATM.L trades at £3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ATM.L's competition here
FAR.L vs AFRK.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while AFRK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check AFRK.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0ICI.L trades at £6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0ICI.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0UYO.L trades at £0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0UYO.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0QPH.L trades at £1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QPH.L's competition here
FAR.L vs HE1.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while HE1.L trades at £0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check HE1.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ARS.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while ARS.L trades at £1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -6.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ARS.L's competition here
FAR.L vs KAV.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while KAV.L trades at £1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check KAV.L's competition here
FAR.L vs NMT.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while NMT.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check NMT.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 1SN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 1SN.L trades at £6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 1SN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while ZNWD.L trades at £4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ZNWD.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0UVX.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, 0UVX.L has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while 0UVX.L trades at £1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas 0UVX.L's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0UVX.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0UVX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0UVX.L's competition here
FAR.L vs MET1.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, MET1.L has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while MET1.L trades at £5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas MET1.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to MET1.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to MET1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check MET1.L's competition here
FAR.L vs PREM.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, PREM.L has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while PREM.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas PREM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to PREM.L's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to PREM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check PREM.L's competition here
FAR.L vs GSP.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while GSP.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check GSP.L's competition here
FAR.L vs CRCL.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, CRCL.L has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while CRCL.L trades at £0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas CRCL.L's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to CRCL.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to CRCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check CRCL.L's competition here
FAR.L vs RMR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 45.7M. In comparison, RMR.L has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £8.95, while RMR.L trades at £0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.95, whereas RMR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to RMR.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to RMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check RMR.L's competition here