Ferro-Alloy Resources Limited
Ferro-Alloy Resources Limited (FAR.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FAR.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAR.L | £7.00 | +3.70% | 34.4M | -3.37 | -£0.02 | N/A |
| BHP.L | £1,927.50 | +1.05% | 98.1B | 11.37 | £1.70 | +4.80% |
| 0R2J.L | £172.30 | -0.12% | 87.1B | 73.57 | £2.34 | +1.12% |
| 0L5V.L | £343.28 | +2.22% | 86.2B | 50.20 | £6.89 | +0.87% |
| RIO.L | £4,480.00 | -0.27% | 76.3B | 9.45 | £4.75 | +6.91% |
| 0IFA.L | £262.96 | +0.90% | 74.6B | 68.46 | £3.84 | +0.96% |
| 0L8B.L | £92.67 | +1.21% | 74.5B | 20.97 | £4.42 | +2.86% |
| 0HBH.L | £282.28 | +0.34% | 63.2B | 28.28 | £10.04 | +2.49% |
| GLEN.L | £299.80 | -0.18% | 35.5B | -29.90 | -£0.10 | +2.91% |
| 0Z4C.L | £231.20 | -2.78% | 32.8B | 35.01 | £6.60 | +1.89% |
Stock Comparison
FAR.L vs BHP.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while BHP.L trades at £1,927.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check BHP.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0R2J.L trades at £172.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 73.57. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R2J.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0L5V.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0L5V.L trades at £343.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0L5V.L's competition here
FAR.L vs RIO.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while RIO.L trades at £4,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check RIO.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0IFA.L trades at £262.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 68.46. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0IFA.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 74.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0L8B.L trades at £92.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0L8B.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0HBH.L trades at £282.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HBH.L's competition here
FAR.L vs GLEN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while GLEN.L trades at £299.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check GLEN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0Z4C.L trades at £231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0Z4C.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0K9L.L trades at £138.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0K9L.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0NHS.L trades at £58.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0NHS.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0KEI.L trades at £105.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0KEI.L's competition here
FAR.L vs AAL.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while AAL.L trades at £2,073.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check AAL.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0EDD.L trades at £50.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0EDD.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0HQU.L trades at £91.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HQU.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0UGS.L trades at £34.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -82.23. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0UGS.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R07.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0R07.L trades at £37.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R07.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0K3B.L trades at £35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0K3B.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0LJ9.L trades at £54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0LJ9.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0KXS.L trades at £156.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0KXS.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0LVK.L trades at £76.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0LVK.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0HC7.L trades at £69.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HC7.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0HCB.L trades at £29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HCB.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0IF3.L trades at £60.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0IF3.L's competition here
FAR.L vs S32.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while S32.L trades at £142.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -35.85. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check S32.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0QYN.L trades at £4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QYN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0U6C.L trades at £27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0U6C.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0R0U.L trades at £9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -85.94. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R0U.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0AHJ.L trades at £13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -23.13. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0AHJ.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0VBE.L trades at £28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -184.70. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VBE.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0HUR.L trades at £48.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HUR.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0I0H.L trades at £9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0I0H.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0IK3.L trades at £37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0IK3.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0VGM.L trades at £12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 61.85. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VGM.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0R0A.L trades at £5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 196.67. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R0A.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0L45.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0L45.L trades at £61.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0L45.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0VL5.L trades at £40.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VL5.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0VGE.L trades at £16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VGE.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0TWH.L trades at £10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FAR.L has daily volatility of 4.91 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check 0TWH.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0QYM.L trades at £9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QYM.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0VOA.L trades at £16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VOA.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0VHI.L trades at £16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VHI.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0KW8.L trades at £21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0KW8.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0R2C.L trades at £7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 68.77. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R2C.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0HWG.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0HWG.L trades at £12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0HWG.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0NZN.L trades at £835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0NZN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0QZ2.L trades at £5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QZ2.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R11.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0R11.L trades at £2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R11.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ADT1.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while ADT1.L trades at £293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ADT1.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 698.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0G5B.L trades at £124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0G5B.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 615.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0VIK.L trades at £3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -11.61. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VIK.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 531M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0O6D.L trades at £14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0O6D.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 492.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0JZT.L trades at £10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -74.71. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0JZT.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0KD1.L trades at £3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -36.20. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0KD1.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R20.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0R20.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R20.L's competition here
FAR.L vs SOLG.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 386.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while SOLG.L trades at £12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check SOLG.L's competition here
FAR.L vs GFM.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 352.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while GFM.L trades at £190.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check GFM.L's competition here
FAR.L vs KMR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 292.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while KMR.L trades at £332.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check KMR.L's competition here
FAR.L vs SVML.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while SVML.L trades at £37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check SVML.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 219M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0UYN.L trades at £1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0UYN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs PRE.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 199.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while PRE.L trades at £69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -33.40. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check PRE.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0P07.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 191.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0P07.L trades at £0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0P07.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0RRC.L trades at £5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0RRC.L's competition here
FAR.L vs CAPD.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 182.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while CAPD.L trades at £92.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check CAPD.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ECOR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 167.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while ECOR.L trades at £68.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -22.40. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ECOR.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0V46.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0V46.L trades at £0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0V46.L's competition here
FAR.L vs BSE.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while BSE.L trades at £12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check BSE.L's competition here
FAR.L vs TRR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while TRR.L trades at £48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check TRR.L's competition here
FAR.L vs MKA.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while MKA.L trades at £36.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -36.20. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check MKA.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0VNO.L trades at £0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0VNO.L's competition here
FAR.L vs KP2.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while KP2.L trades at £2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check KP2.L's competition here
FAR.L vs JLP.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while JLP.L trades at £3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check JLP.L's competition here
FAR.L vs CUSN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 94M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while CUSN.L trades at £7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check CUSN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs RBW.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while RBW.L trades at £13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check RBW.L's competition here
FAR.L vs SAV.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while SAV.L trades at £3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check SAV.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0QVG.L trades at £6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QVG.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0UIK.L trades at £0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0UIK.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0IYS.L trades at £0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0IYS.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0QQR.L trades at £14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QQR.L's competition here
FAR.L vs KOD.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while KOD.L trades at £0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check KOD.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0R0D.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0R0D.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ALL.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while ALL.L trades at £7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ALL.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ATM.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while ATM.L trades at £3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ATM.L's competition here
FAR.L vs AFRK.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while AFRK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check AFRK.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0ICI.L trades at £6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0ICI.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0UYO.L trades at £0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0UYO.L's competition here
FAR.L vs HE1.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while HE1.L trades at £0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check HE1.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0QPH.L trades at £1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0QPH.L's competition here
FAR.L vs KAV.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while KAV.L trades at £1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check KAV.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ARS.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while ARS.L trades at £0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ARS.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 0UVX.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 0UVX.L has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 0UVX.L trades at £1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 0UVX.L's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 0UVX.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 0UVX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 0UVX.L's competition here
FAR.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while ZNWD.L trades at £5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check ZNWD.L's competition here
FAR.L vs NMT.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while NMT.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check NMT.L's competition here
FAR.L vs 1SN.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while 1SN.L trades at £5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check 1SN.L's competition here
FAR.L vs PREM.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, PREM.L has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while PREM.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas PREM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to PREM.L's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to PREM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check PREM.L's competition here
FAR.L vs CRCL.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, CRCL.L has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while CRCL.L trades at £0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas CRCL.L's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to CRCL.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to CRCL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check CRCL.L's competition here
FAR.L vs GSP.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while GSP.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check GSP.L's competition here
FAR.L vs MET1.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, MET1.L has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while MET1.L trades at £4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas MET1.L's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to MET1.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to MET1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check MET1.L's competition here
FAR.L vs EMH.L Comparison August 2025
FAR.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAR.L stands at 34.4M. In comparison, EMH.L has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAR.L is priced at £7.00, while EMH.L trades at £8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas EMH.L's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, FAR.L's ROE is -1.12%, compared to EMH.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAR.L is less volatile compared to EMH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAR.L.Check EMH.L's competition here