First Acceptance Corporation
First Acceptance Corporation (FACO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FACO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACO | $4.57 | +5.06% | 167.7M | 5.71 | $0.80 | N/A |
| MDBPF | $2.78 | +0.00% | 7.7B | 23.17 | $0.12 | +4.55% |
| PSKRF | $47.40 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 14.54 | $3.26 | +2.97% |
| LCSHF | $7.45 | -10.35% | 1.8B | 6.37 | $1.17 | +19.84% |
| TRRSF | $30.36 | -1.24% | 1.4B | 14.67 | $2.07 | N/A |
| ACMT | $26.00 | +0.00% | 33.7M | 50.00 | $0.52 | N/A |
| PPHI | $7.50 | -6.25% | 27.1M | -10.71 | -$0.70 | N/A |
| ACMTA | $22.00 | +0.00% | 17M | 30.14 | $0.73 | N/A |
| PMIR | $0.24 | -4.00% | 497.9K | -0.05 | -$4.50 | N/A |
| MMMM | $0.00 | +0.00% | 21.7K | N/A | -$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FACO vs MDBPF Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, MDBPF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while MDBPF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas MDBPF's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDBPF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is less volatile compared to MDBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check MDBPF's competition here
FACO vs PSKRF Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, PSKRF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while PSKRF trades at $47.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas PSKRF's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSKRF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is less volatile compared to PSKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check PSKRF's competition here
FACO vs LCSHF Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, LCSHF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while LCSHF trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas LCSHF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LCSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is less volatile compared to LCSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check LCSHF's competition here
FACO vs TRRSF Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, TRRSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while TRRSF trades at $30.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas TRRSF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is more volatile compared to TRRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check TRRSF's competition here
FACO vs ACMT Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, ACMT has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while ACMT trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ACMT's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is more volatile compared to ACMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check ACMT's competition here
FACO vs PPHI Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, PPHI has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while PPHI trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas PPHI's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is more volatile compared to PPHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check PPHI's competition here
FACO vs ACMTA Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, ACMTA has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while ACMTA trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ACMTA's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACMTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is less volatile compared to ACMTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check ACMTA's competition here
FACO vs PMIR Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, PMIR has a market cap of 497.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while PMIR trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas PMIR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PMIR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is less volatile compared to PMIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check PMIR's competition here
FACO vs MMMM Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, MMMM has a market cap of 21.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while MMMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas MMMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MMMM's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is more volatile compared to MMMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check MMMM's competition here
FACO vs FPLF Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, FPLF has a market cap of 17K. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while FPLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas FPLF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FPLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is more volatile compared to FPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check FPLF's competition here
FACO vs RQIHF Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, RQIHF has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while RQIHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas RQIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RQIHF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is less volatile compared to RQIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check RQIHF's competition here
FACO vs TGIC Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, TGIC has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while TGIC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas TGIC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TGIC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is less volatile compared to TGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check TGIC's competition here
FACO vs ATHLV Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, ATHLV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while ATHLV trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ATHLV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATHLV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is more volatile compared to ATHLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check ATHLV's competition here
FACO vs SYCRF Comparison April 2026
FACO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACO stands at 167.7M. In comparison, SYCRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FACO is priced at $4.57, while SYCRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas SYCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYCRF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FACO is more volatile compared to SYCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACO.Check SYCRF's competition here