Eagle Eye Solutions Group plc
Eagle Eye Solutions Group plc EYE.L Peers
See (EYE.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EYE.L | $392.00 | +2.04% | 116.58M | 16.33 | $0.24 | N/A |
| 0A7O.L | $400.46 | +0.62% | 101.62B | -7.51 | -$53.33 | N/A |
| 0A3O.L | $118.09 | +0.45% | 40.58B | 39364.67 | $0.00 | N/A |
| 0IL6.L | $283.24 | -0.12% | 16.27B | 49.91 | $5.68 | N/A |
| SGE.L | $1,243.50 | +1.06% | 12.10B | 36.57 | $0.34 | +1.64% |
| 0U3Q.L | $200.00 | +9.76% | 5.19B | 92.21 | $2.17 | +0.95% |
| 0QOA.L | $74.54 | -5.84% | 4.25B | 30.90 | $2.41 | +1.76% |
| 0DWV.L | $177.80 | -4.92% | 3.48B | 113.18 | $1.57 | +0.36% |
| 0OA4.L | $191.40 | -0.83% | 3.07B | 1069.27 | $0.18 | +0.15% |
| 0M2A.L | $13.20 | -0.23% | 1.43B | N/A | N/A | +1.83% |
Stock Comparison
EYE.L vs 0A7O.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0A7O.L has a market cap of 101.62B. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0A7O.L trades at $400.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0A7O.L's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0A7O.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0A7O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0A3O.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0A3O.L has a market cap of 40.58B. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0A3O.L trades at $118.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0A3O.L's P/E ratio is 39364.67. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0A3O.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0A3O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0IL6.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0IL6.L has a market cap of 16.27B. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0IL6.L trades at $283.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0IL6.L's P/E ratio is 49.91. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0IL6.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0IL6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs SGE.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, SGE.L has a market cap of 12.10B. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while SGE.L trades at $1,243.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas SGE.L's P/E ratio is 36.57. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SGE.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to SGE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0U3Q.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0U3Q.L has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0U3Q.L trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0U3Q.L's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0U3Q.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0U3Q.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0QOA.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0QOA.L has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0QOA.L trades at $74.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0QOA.L's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0QOA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to 0QOA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0DWV.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0DWV.L has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0DWV.L trades at $177.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0DWV.L's P/E ratio is 113.18. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0DWV.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0DWV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0OA4.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0OA4.L has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0OA4.L trades at $191.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0OA4.L's P/E ratio is 1069.27. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0OA4.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0OA4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0M2A.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0M2A.L has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0M2A.L trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0M2A.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0M2A.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0M2A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs TRST.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, TRST.L has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while TRST.L trades at $252.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas TRST.L's P/E ratio is 252.60. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRST.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to TRST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs KNOS.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, KNOS.L has a market cap of 997.17M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while KNOS.L trades at $813.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas KNOS.L's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KNOS.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to KNOS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0RS2.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0RS2.L has a market cap of 937.12M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0RS2.L trades at $55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0RS2.L's P/E ratio is 40.83. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0RS2.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0RS2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0GM9.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0GM9.L has a market cap of 880.02M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0GM9.L trades at $153.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0GM9.L's P/E ratio is -47.53. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0GM9.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0GM9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs LTG.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, LTG.L has a market cap of 791.52M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while LTG.L trades at $99.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas LTG.L's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LTG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to LTG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs GBG.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, GBG.L has a market cap of 729.64M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while GBG.L trades at $290.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas GBG.L's P/E ratio is 96.83. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GBG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to GBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ALFA.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ALFA.L has a market cap of 721.35M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ALFA.L trades at $243.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ALFA.L's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALFA.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to ALFA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ATG.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ATG.L has a market cap of 601.25M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ATG.L trades at $496.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ATG.L's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to ATG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs CER.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, CER.L has a market cap of 541.25M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while CER.L trades at $1,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas CER.L's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CER.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to CER.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs DEV.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, DEV.L has a market cap of 508.63M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while DEV.L trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas DEV.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DEV.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to DEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs NCC.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, NCC.L has a market cap of 482.55M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while NCC.L trades at $157.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas NCC.L's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NCC.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to NCC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs PBEE.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, PBEE.L has a market cap of 385.95M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while PBEE.L trades at $163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas PBEE.L's P/E ratio is -163.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PBEE.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to PBEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0L8Z.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0L8Z.L has a market cap of 371.36M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0L8Z.L trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0L8Z.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0L8Z.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0L8Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs IQG.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, IQG.L has a market cap of 331.32M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while IQG.L trades at $478.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas IQG.L's P/E ratio is -239.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IQG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to IQG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs BIG.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, BIG.L has a market cap of 293.89M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while BIG.L trades at $102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas BIG.L's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BIG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to BIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs DOTD.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, DOTD.L has a market cap of 276.16M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while DOTD.L trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas DOTD.L's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOTD.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to DOTD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs IDOX.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, IDOX.L has a market cap of 257.18M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while IDOX.L trades at $56.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas IDOX.L's P/E ratio is 56.40. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IDOX.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to IDOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ACSO.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ACSO.L has a market cap of 200.45M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ACSO.L trades at $497.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ACSO.L's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ACSO.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to ACSO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs NET.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, NET.L has a market cap of 188.66M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while NET.L trades at $113.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas NET.L's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NET.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to NET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs APTD.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, APTD.L has a market cap of 161.47M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while APTD.L trades at $290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas APTD.L's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APTD.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to APTD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0AAW.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0AAW.L has a market cap of 158.80M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0AAW.L trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0AAW.L's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0AAW.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0AAW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0N6K.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0N6K.L has a market cap of 145.17M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0N6K.L trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0N6K.L's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0N6K.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to 0N6K.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs GHT.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, GHT.L has a market cap of 135.73M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while GHT.L trades at $161.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas GHT.L's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GHT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to GHT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs TRCS.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, TRCS.L has a market cap of 127.17M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while TRCS.L trades at $420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas TRCS.L's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRCS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to TRCS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ELCO.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ELCO.L has a market cap of 126.02M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ELCO.L trades at $151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ELCO.L's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELCO.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to ELCO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs SAAS.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, SAAS.L has a market cap of 124.64M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while SAAS.L trades at $107.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas SAAS.L's P/E ratio is -53.75. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAAS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to SAAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs SPE.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, SPE.L has a market cap of 106.56M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while SPE.L trades at $990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas SPE.L's P/E ratio is -165.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPE.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to SPE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs SPSY.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, SPSY.L has a market cap of 103.21M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while SPSY.L trades at $214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas SPSY.L's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPSY.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to SPSY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs IGP.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, IGP.L has a market cap of 103.18M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while IGP.L trades at $176.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas IGP.L's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IGP.L's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to IGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs SPSC.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, SPSC.L has a market cap of 95.76M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while SPSC.L trades at $250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas SPSC.L's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPSC.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to SPSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs TRB.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, TRB.L has a market cap of 87.63M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while TRB.L trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas TRB.L's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRB.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to TRB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs AOM.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, AOM.L has a market cap of 84.57M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while AOM.L trades at $118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas AOM.L's P/E ratio is 59.25. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to AOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs RM.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, RM.L has a market cap of 84.09M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while RM.L trades at $101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas RM.L's P/E ratio is -20.20. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RM.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to RM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0QK1.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0QK1.L has a market cap of 83.58M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0QK1.L trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0QK1.L's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0QK1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0QK1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ACC.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ACC.L has a market cap of 77.90M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ACC.L trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ACC.L's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ACC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to ACC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs OMG.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, OMG.L has a market cap of 77.23M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while OMG.L trades at $62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas OMG.L's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OMG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to OMG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs WAND.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, WAND.L has a market cap of 75.72M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while WAND.L trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas WAND.L's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WAND.L's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EYE.L has daily volatility of 2.84 and WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A.
EYE.L vs CLBS.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, CLBS.L has a market cap of 73.53M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while CLBS.L trades at $185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas CLBS.L's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLBS.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to CLBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs D4T4.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, D4T4.L has a market cap of 70.56M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while D4T4.L trades at $177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas D4T4.L's P/E ratio is 35.40. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to D4T4.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to D4T4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs SPA.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, SPA.L has a market cap of 60.10M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while SPA.L trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas SPA.L's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to SPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs PULS.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, PULS.L has a market cap of 52.36M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while PULS.L trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas PULS.L's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PULS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to PULS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs CRTA.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, CRTA.L has a market cap of 44.47M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while CRTA.L trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas CRTA.L's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRTA.L's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to CRTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs SKL.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, SKL.L has a market cap of 32.21M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while SKL.L trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas SKL.L's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SKL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to SKL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs SMRT.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, SMRT.L has a market cap of 25.56M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while SMRT.L trades at $88.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas SMRT.L's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SMRT.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to SMRT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs GETB.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, GETB.L has a market cap of 24.08M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while GETB.L trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas GETB.L's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GETB.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to GETB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs CHSS.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, CHSS.L has a market cap of 23.24M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while CHSS.L trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas CHSS.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHSS.L's ROE of -4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to CHSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ESYS.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ESYS.L has a market cap of 21.04M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ESYS.L trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ESYS.L's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESYS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to ESYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs TEK.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, TEK.L has a market cap of 16.81M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while TEK.L trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas TEK.L's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TEK.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to TEK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ITIM.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ITIM.L has a market cap of 15.63M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ITIM.L trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ITIM.L's P/E ratio is 49.75. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ITIM.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to ITIM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ALT.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ALT.L has a market cap of 15.31M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ALT.L trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ALT.L's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to ALT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs CRDL.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, CRDL.L has a market cap of 15.18M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while CRDL.L trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas CRDL.L's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRDL.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to CRDL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0A8G.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0A8G.L has a market cap of 14.99M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0A8G.L trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0A8G.L's P/E ratio is -50.49. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0A8G.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0A8G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs CKT.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, CKT.L has a market cap of 14.58M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while CKT.L trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas CKT.L's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CKT.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to CKT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs BIRD.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, BIRD.L has a market cap of 14.52M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while BIRD.L trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas BIRD.L's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BIRD.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to BIRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs PEN.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, PEN.L has a market cap of 13.19M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while PEN.L trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas PEN.L's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PEN.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to PEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ARC.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ARC.L has a market cap of 11.17M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ARC.L trades at $83.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ARC.L's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARC.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to ARC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ING.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ING.L has a market cap of 10.01M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ING.L trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ING.L's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ING.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to ING.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ZOO.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ZOO.L has a market cap of 8.85M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ZOO.L trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ZOO.L's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZOO.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to ZOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs S247.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, S247.L has a market cap of 8.80M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while S247.L trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas S247.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to S247.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to S247.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs TERN.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, TERN.L has a market cap of 7.81M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while TERN.L trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas TERN.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TERN.L's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to TERN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 4GBL.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 4GBL.L has a market cap of 6.59M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 4GBL.L trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 4GBL.L's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 4GBL.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L and 4GBL.L have similar daily volatility (2.84).
EYE.L vs EXR.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, EXR.L has a market cap of 5.64M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while EXR.L trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas EXR.L's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EXR.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to EXR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs MBT.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, MBT.L has a market cap of 4.83M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while MBT.L trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas MBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MBT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to MBT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs 0O8X.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, 0O8X.L has a market cap of 3.71M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while 0O8X.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas 0O8X.L's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0O8X.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to 0O8X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs TIDE.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, TIDE.L has a market cap of 3.19M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while TIDE.L trades at $48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas TIDE.L's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TIDE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to TIDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs RTOP.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, RTOP.L has a market cap of 2.70M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while RTOP.L trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas RTOP.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RTOP.L's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to RTOP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs RDT.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, RDT.L has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while RDT.L trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas RDT.L's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RDT.L's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to RDT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs AIQ.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, AIQ.L has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while AIQ.L trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas AIQ.L's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AIQ.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to AIQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs OBC.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, OBC.L has a market cap of 2.22M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while OBC.L trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas OBC.L's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OBC.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EYE.L has daily volatility of 2.84 and OBC.L has daily volatility of N/A.
EYE.L vs ACRM.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ACRM.L has a market cap of 2.18M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ACRM.L trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ACRM.L's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ACRM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to ACRM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs MBO.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, MBO.L has a market cap of 2.02M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while MBO.L trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas MBO.L's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MBO.L's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to MBO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs SYME.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, SYME.L has a market cap of 2.01M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while SYME.L trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas SYME.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SYME.L's ROE of +6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to SYME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs DSG.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, DSG.L has a market cap of 1.79M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while DSG.L trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas DSG.L's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DSG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to DSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs SORT.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, SORT.L has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while SORT.L trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas SORT.L's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SORT.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to SORT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs LOOP.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, LOOP.L has a market cap of 1.43M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while LOOP.L trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas LOOP.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LOOP.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to LOOP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs ENET.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, ENET.L has a market cap of 1.23M. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while ENET.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas ENET.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ENET.L's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to ENET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs PTRO.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, PTRO.L has a market cap of 954336.00. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while PTRO.L trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas PTRO.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PTRO.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EYE.L has daily volatility of 2.84 and PTRO.L has daily volatility of N/A.
EYE.L vs INX.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, INX.L has a market cap of 665361.00. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while INX.L trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas INX.L's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INX.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is less volatile compared to INX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.
EYE.L vs LSAI.L Comparison
EYE.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EYE.L stands at 116.58M. In comparison, LSAI.L has a market cap of 9108.00. Regarding current trading prices, EYE.L is priced at $392.00, while LSAI.L trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EYE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.33, whereas LSAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EYE.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LSAI.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EYE.L is more volatile compared to LSAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EYE.L.