First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF
First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF (ETP.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ETP.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP.TO | CA$18.09 | +0.44% | 15.3M | 16.12 | CA$1.12 | +4.16% |
| BNC.TO | CA$30.00 | +0.60% | 9.1B | 14.03 | CA$2.14 | +8.49% |
| EIT-UN.TO | CA$15.19 | -0.59% | 2.8B | 6.60 | CA$2.30 | +8.13% |
| NUBF.TO | CA$21.52 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 14.83 | CA$1.45 | +4.17% |
| NREA.TO | CA$24.74 | -1.47% | 1.4B | 21.23 | CA$1.18 | +1.83% |
| PFIA.TO | CA$10.18 | +0.10% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.02% |
| MKB.TO | CA$19.06 | -0.26% | 850.5M | N/A | N/A | +3.40% |
| AD-UN.TO | CA$18.68 | -1.94% | 849.5M | 6.46 | CA$2.89 | +7.25% |
| FIE.TO | CA$8.95 | -0.56% | 848M | 13.46 | CA$0.66 | +5.37% |
| HDIF.TO | CA$8.66 | -0.80% | 435.6M | 20.43 | CA$0.42 | +10.23% |
Stock Comparison
ETP.TO vs BNC.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while BNC.TO trades at CA$30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and BNC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNC.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs EIT-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, EIT-UN.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while EIT-UN.TO trades at CA$15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas EIT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EIT-UN.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to EIT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check EIT-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs NUBF.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, NUBF.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while NUBF.TO trades at CA$21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas NUBF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUBF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to NUBF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check NUBF.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs NREA.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while NREA.TO trades at CA$24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and NREA.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NREA.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs PFIA.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PFIA.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while PFIA.TO trades at CA$10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas PFIA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFIA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to PFIA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check PFIA.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs MKB.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, MKB.TO has a market cap of 850.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while MKB.TO trades at CA$19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas MKB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to MKB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check MKB.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs AD-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, AD-UN.TO has a market cap of 849.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while AD-UN.TO trades at CA$18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas AD-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AD-UN.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to AD-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check AD-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs FIE.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FIE.TO has a market cap of 848M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while FIE.TO trades at CA$8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas FIE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to FIE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check FIE.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs HDIF.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HDIF.TO has a market cap of 435.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while HDIF.TO trades at CA$8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas HDIF.TO's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to HDIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check HDIF.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs XTR.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, XTR.TO has a market cap of 355.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while XTR.TO trades at CA$11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas XTR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to XTR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check XTR.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs CIC.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CIC.TO has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while CIC.TO trades at CA$13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas CIC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to CIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check CIC.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs VCIP.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, VCIP.TO has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while VCIP.TO trades at CA$26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas VCIP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCIP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to VCIP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check VCIP.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs IFRF.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, IFRF.TO has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while IFRF.TO trades at CA$7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas IFRF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFRF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and IFRF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IFRF.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs CCOR.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CCOR.TO has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while CCOR.TO trades at CA$17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas CCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and CCOR.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCOR.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs ZMI.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ZMI.TO has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while ZMI.TO trades at CA$17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas ZMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to ZMI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check ZMI.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs PBY-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PBY-UN.TO has a market cap of 143.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while PBY-UN.TO trades at CA$15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas PBY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBY-UN.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to PBY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check PBY-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs HUBL.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HUBL.TO has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while HUBL.TO trades at CA$13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas HUBL.TO's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and HUBL.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUBL.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs PIC-A.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PIC-A.TO has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while PIC-A.TO trades at CA$7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas PIC-A.TO's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIC-A.TO's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to PIC-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check PIC-A.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs MGB.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, MGB.TO has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while MGB.TO trades at CA$16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas MGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and MGB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGB.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs BMAX.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, BMAX.TO has a market cap of 109.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while BMAX.TO trades at CA$14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas BMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to BMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check BMAX.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs PLDI.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PLDI.TO has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while PLDI.TO trades at CA$18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas PLDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and PLDI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLDI.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs FAP.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FAP.TO has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while FAP.TO trades at CA$2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas FAP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAP.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to FAP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check FAP.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs BGI-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, BGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while BGI-UN.TO trades at CA$6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas BGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to BGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check BGI-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs TLF.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, TLF.TO has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while TLF.TO trades at CA$25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas TLF.TO's P/E ratio is 36.06. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to TLF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check TLF.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs HTAE.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HTAE.TO has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while HTAE.TO trades at CA$16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas HTAE.TO's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTAE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to HTAE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check HTAE.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs XINC.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, XINC.TO has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while XINC.TO trades at CA$20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas XINC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XINC.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and XINC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XINC.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs MID-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, MID-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while MID-UN.TO trades at CA$7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas MID-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MID-UN.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and MID-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MID-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs FFI-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FFI-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while FFI-UN.TO trades at CA$12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas FFI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to FFI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check FFI-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs RBN-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, RBN-UN.TO has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while RBN-UN.TO trades at CA$8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas RBN-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBN-UN.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to RBN-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check RBN-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs HGR.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HGR.TO has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while HGR.TO trades at CA$5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas HGR.TO's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to HGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check HGR.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs XSC.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, XSC.TO has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while XSC.TO trades at CA$17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas XSC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and XSC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XSC.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs HHLE.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HHLE.TO has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while HHLE.TO trades at CA$8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas HHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to HHLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check HHLE.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs XSI.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, XSI.TO has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while XSI.TO trades at CA$17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas XSI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and XSI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XSI.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs EARN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, EARN.TO has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while EARN.TO trades at CA$49.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas EARN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EARN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and EARN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EARN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs SKG-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, SKG-UN.TO has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while SKG-UN.TO trades at CA$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas SKG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to SKG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check SKG-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs FCGI.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FCGI.TO has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while FCGI.TO trades at CA$14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas FCGI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and FCGI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCGI.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs INC-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, INC-UN.TO has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while INC-UN.TO trades at CA$8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas INC-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INC-UN.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and INC-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INC-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs RIFI.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, RIFI.TO has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while RIFI.TO trades at CA$17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas RIFI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIFI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and RIFI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIFI.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs PIN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PIN.TO has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while PIN.TO trades at CA$18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas PIN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and PIN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs PHR.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PHR.TO has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while PHR.TO trades at CA$19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas PHR.TO's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and PHR.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHR.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs ZWQT.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ZWQT.TO has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while ZWQT.TO trades at CA$17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas ZWQT.TO's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to ZWQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check ZWQT.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs FCMI.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FCMI.TO has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while FCMI.TO trades at CA$13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas FCMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCMI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and FCMI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCMI.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs FGX.NE Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FGX.NE has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while FGX.NE trades at CA$4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas FGX.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGX.NE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and FGX.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FGX.NE's competition here
ETP.TO vs BSO-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, BSO-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while BSO-UN.TO trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas BSO-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSO-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to BSO-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check BSO-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs CIQ-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CIQ-UN.TO has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while CIQ-UN.TO trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas CIQ-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIQ-UN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and CIQ-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIQ-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs TPAY.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, TPAY.TO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while TPAY.TO trades at CA$21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas TPAY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPAY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to TPAY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check TPAY.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs ENI-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ENI-UN.TO has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while ENI-UN.TO trades at CA$1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas ENI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to ENI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check ENI-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs CES.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CES.TO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while CES.TO trades at CA$24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas CES.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CES.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to CES.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check CES.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs HID.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HID.TO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while HID.TO trades at CA$21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas HID.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HID.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to HID.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check HID.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs HBFE.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HBFE.TO has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while HBFE.TO trades at CA$10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas HBFE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to HBFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check HBFE.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs REIT.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, REIT.TO has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while REIT.TO trades at CA$22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas REIT.TO's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and REIT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REIT.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs BLB-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, BLB-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while BLB-UN.TO trades at CA$7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas BLB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to BLB-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check BLB-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs HBL-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HBL-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while HBL-UN.TO trades at CA$11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas HBL-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBL-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to HBL-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check HBL-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs PGI-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while PGI-UN.TO trades at CA$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas PGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO is less volatile compared to PGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETP.TO.Check PGI-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs IGLB.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, IGLB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while IGLB.TO trades at CA$10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas IGLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and IGLB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGLB.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs PMB-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PMB-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while PMB-UN.TO trades at CA$7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas PMB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and PMB-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMB-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs BUA-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, BUA-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while BUA-UN.TO trades at CA$7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas BUA-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUA-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and BUA-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BUA-UN.TO's competition here
ETP.TO vs GDG-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
ETP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETP.TO stands at 15.3M. In comparison, GDG-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETP.TO is priced at CA$18.09, while GDG-UN.TO trades at CA$13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas GDG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETP.TO and GDG-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDG-UN.TO's competition here