Eutelsat Communications S.A.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, CIS.BR has a market cap of 228.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while CIS.BR trades at $53.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas CIS.BR's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CIS.BR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to CIS.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, NOKIA.PA has a market cap of 23.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while NOKIA.PA trades at $4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas NOKIA.PA's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NOKIA.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to NOKIA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, TWEKA.AS has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while TWEKA.AS trades at $36.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas TWEKA.AS's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TWEKA.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to TWEKA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, EVS.BR has a market cap of 512.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while EVS.BR trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas EVS.BR's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to EVS.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to EVS.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, PARRO.PA has a market cap of 219.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while PARRO.PA trades at $7.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas PARRO.PA's P/E ratio is -11.02. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PARRO.PA's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to PARRO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALLEC.PA has a market cap of 186.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while ALLEC.PA trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas ALLEC.PA's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALLEC.PA's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to ALLEC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, EKI.PA has a market cap of 91.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while EKI.PA trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas EKI.PA's P/E ratio is -13.06. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to EKI.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to EKI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, AKOM.PA has a market cap of 51.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while AKOM.PA trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas AKOM.PA's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AKOM.PA's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to AKOM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ATEME.PA has a market cap of 46.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while ATEME.PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas ATEME.PA's P/E ratio is -14.36. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ATEME.PA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to ATEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALNTG.PA has a market cap of 33.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while ALNTG.PA trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas ALNTG.PA's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALNTG.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to ALNTG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALBPK.PA has a market cap of 20.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while ALBPK.PA trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas ALBPK.PA's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALBPK.PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to ALBPK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALHF.PA has a market cap of 15.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while ALHF.PA trades at $5.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas ALHF.PA's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALHF.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to ALHF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, OPTI.BR has a market cap of 12.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while OPTI.BR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas OPTI.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OPTI.BR's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to OPTI.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALTXC.PA has a market cap of 10.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while ALTXC.PA trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas ALTXC.PA's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALTXC.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to ALTXC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALNN6.PA has a market cap of 9.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while ALNN6.PA trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas ALNN6.PA's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALNN6.PA's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to ALNN6.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, AVT.PA has a market cap of 3.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while AVT.PA trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas AVT.PA's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AVT.PA's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to AVT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALARF.PA has a market cap of 2.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while ALARF.PA trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas ALARF.PA's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALARF.PA's ROE of -3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to ALARF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, HF.PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while HF.PA trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas HF.PA's P/E ratio is -48.97. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HF.PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to HF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, VDLO.PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while VDLO.PA trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas VDLO.PA's P/E ratio is -28.89. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VDLO.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to VDLO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.

ETL.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ETL.PA stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALAVY.PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ETL.PA is priced at $4.50, while ALAVY.PA trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ETL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.20, whereas ALAVY.PA's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, ETL.PA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALAVY.PA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ETL.PA is more volatile compared to ALAVY.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETL.PA.