Evertz Technologies Limited

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, CSCO.NE has a market cap of 374.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while CSCO.NE trades at CA$33.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas CSCO.NE's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CSCO.NE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to CSCO.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, MAXR.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while MAXR.TO trades at CA$70.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas MAXR.TO's P/E ratio is -25.65. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAXR.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to MAXR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, TSAT.TO has a market cap of 509.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while TSAT.TO trades at CA$34.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas TSAT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSAT.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to TSAT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, VCM.TO has a market cap of 228.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while VCM.TO trades at CA$9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas VCM.TO's P/E ratio is 62.67. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VCM.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to VCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, QTRH.TO has a market cap of 163.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while QTRH.TO trades at CA$1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas QTRH.TO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QTRH.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to QTRH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, BYL.TO has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while BYL.TO trades at CA$0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas BYL.TO's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BYL.TO's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to BYL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, VTI.CN has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while VTI.CN trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas VTI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VTI.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to VTI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, NUR.CN has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while NUR.CN trades at CA$0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas NUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NUR.CN's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to NUR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, MMAX.CN has a market cap of 92K. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while MMAX.CN trades at CA$0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas MMAX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MMAX.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to MMAX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, SW.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while SW.TO trades at CA$40.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas SW.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SW.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to SW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, AJX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while AJX.TO trades at CA$0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas AJX.TO's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AJX.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to AJX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, EXF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while EXF.TO trades at CA$7.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas EXF.TO's P/E ratio is -55.75. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXF.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to EXF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 942.6M. In comparison, RDL.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at CA$12.47, while RDL.TO trades at CA$0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas RDL.TO's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RDL.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to RDL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.