Evertz Technologies Limited

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, CSCO.NE has a market cap of 325.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while CSCO.NE trades at $29.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas CSCO.NE's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CSCO.NE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to CSCO.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, MAXR.TO has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while MAXR.TO trades at $70.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas MAXR.TO's P/E ratio is -25.65. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAXR.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to MAXR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, TSAT.TO has a market cap of 309.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while TSAT.TO trades at $22.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas TSAT.TO's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSAT.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to TSAT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, VCM.TO has a market cap of 252.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while VCM.TO trades at $10.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas VCM.TO's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VCM.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to VCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, QTRH.TO has a market cap of 166.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while QTRH.TO trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas QTRH.TO's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QTRH.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to QTRH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, BYL.TO has a market cap of 38.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while BYL.TO trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas BYL.TO's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BYL.TO's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to BYL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, VTI.CN has a market cap of 6.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while VTI.CN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas VTI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VTI.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to VTI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, NUR.CN has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while NUR.CN trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas NUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NUR.CN's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is less volatile compared to NUR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, MMAX.CN has a market cap of 249164.00. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while MMAX.CN trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas MMAX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MMAX.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to MMAX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, SW.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while SW.TO trades at $40.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas SW.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SW.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to SW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, AJX.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while AJX.TO trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas AJX.TO's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AJX.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to AJX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, RDL.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while RDL.TO trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas RDL.TO's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RDL.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to RDL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.

ET.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET.TO stands at 833.38M. In comparison, EXF.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET.TO is priced at $10.98, while EXF.TO trades at $7.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.08, whereas EXF.TO's P/E ratio is -55.75. In terms of profitability, ET.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXF.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ET.TO is more volatile compared to EXF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.TO.