Eros Media World Plc

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 485.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NFLX trades at $1,140.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 53.94. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 190.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while DIS trades at $105.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 55.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while UMGNF trades at $30.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 55.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while UNVGY trades at $15.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 31.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LYV trades at $136.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 46.28. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 30.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while FWONA trades at $87.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is -672.23. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 30.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while FWONK trades at $95.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is -794.50. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to FWONK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 27.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while FWONB trades at $80.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is -619.23. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to FWONB's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 22.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while WBD trades at $9.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 21.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while FOXA trades at $50.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 21.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while FOX trades at $46.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while VIAC trades at $29.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 17.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BOIVF trades at $6.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 105.92. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 16.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NWS trades at $32.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 16.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NWSA trades at $28.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while WMG trades at $27.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to WMG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 13.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TKO trades at $159.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 7992.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 12.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CEVMY trades at $31.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 10.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CEVMF trades at $110.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CEVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to VIVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while EDR trades at $29.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 8.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ROKU trades at $60.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -83.47. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 8.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while PARA trades at $11.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.39B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while PARAP trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while WWE trades at $100.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while PARAA trades at $22.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SIRI trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TKCOF trades at $43.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to TKCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 6.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LLYVK trades at $75.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is -227.52. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 6.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LLYVA trades at $74.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is -217.74. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NXST trades at $164.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MSGS trades at $191.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 913.24. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TOEAF trades at $21.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to TOEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CNK trades at $31.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while VIVHY trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -15.16. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MCOIF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BATRK trades at $40.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -81.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BATRA trades at $43.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -86.98. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MANU trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -13.37. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MCHOY trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while APE trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to APE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CYFWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MHSDF trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LION trades at $7.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LGF-A's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BOWL trades at $11.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BOWL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MSGE trades at $36.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MSGE's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NANHF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to NANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CYFWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NENTY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to NENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while IMAX trades at $26.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 56.57. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ATVDY trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ATVDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while JVTSF trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -320.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AMC trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SPHR trades at $32.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AIOSF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SBGI trades at $15.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SBGI's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 809.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HUYA trades at $3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -120.67. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 685.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while PLAY trades at $19.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CIEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 525.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MCS trades at $16.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -67.76. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 469.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RSVR trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 445.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CPXGF trades at $7.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 413.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BORUF trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BORUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 305.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while IMXCF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 284.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AMCX trades at $6.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 275.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while WLDBF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +30.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LIVX trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 258.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while IQ trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CLQDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CLQDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 192.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AFCJF trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 188.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CLTFF trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 162.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NENTF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 131.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while GAIA trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -23.91. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 129.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AENT trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 112.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while APTTF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to APTTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 107.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while DTTVY trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while GNUS trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to GNUS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 101.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while GOAI trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to GOAI's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to GOAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while STEAF trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 75.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RSVRW trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ANGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 69.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LVO trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 62.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AGAE trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CIDM trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 46.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RDI trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RDI's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 44.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CNVS trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 44.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RDIB trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RDIB's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 38.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ANGH trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ANGH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 37.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while THBRF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ZUMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 34.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ANGHW's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LGMH trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 29.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TOON trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 28.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NIPG trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 28.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while APHP trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to APHP's ROE of +55.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 24.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while OAMCF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to OAMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 20.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ADD trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 18.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while QYOUF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 17.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ICABY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MMV trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ASGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 13.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while KUKE trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to KUKE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 12.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while DLPN trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to DLPN's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 12.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HWAL trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BBOP trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BBOP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CSCW trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 10.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MVNC trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 9.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AENTW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 9.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CPOP trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 7.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LTES trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LTES's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 6.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BREA trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BREA's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 6.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HHSE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AMFL trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HOFV trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ICABF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ICABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 3.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ENTEF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ENTEF's ROE of -7.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CSSE trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CAPV trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 2.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while STGZ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while ITVI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to ITVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BZFDW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BZFDW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 2.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HQGE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BLMZ trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while EEGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HDUP trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BSEG trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BLIAQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to BLIAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NETWF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while STCXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to STCXF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to STCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 978710.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SEGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925286.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AFOM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to AFOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 843035.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while UMGP trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 738565.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while VNUE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AMNNF has a market cap of 736064.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AMNNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AMNNF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AMNNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 668740.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while GULDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 631516.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RLTR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499820.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CCLX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 496891.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while WRIT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463682.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TAMG trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to TAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 460484.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BOTY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389826.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while WEBB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to WEBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 360200.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while VGTL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313681.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while IMTV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260304.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CEXE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CEXE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 258474.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TRMNF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258051.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, BRSE has a market cap of 255530.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while BRSE trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas BRSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to BRSE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to BRSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244876.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RIVU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to RIVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222700.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MIKP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MIKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148773.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MLFB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MLFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112921.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SNMN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 109089.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RWMI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 81392.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SAPX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to SAPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63000.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while URBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to URBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to URBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58008.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SVSN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SVSN's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to SVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57053.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while GBHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to GBHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 56812.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while PLFX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47158.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AMRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AMRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37523.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HOMU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to HOMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33260.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while XSPT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to XSPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, GTOR has a market cap of 24129.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while GTOR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas GTOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to GTOR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to GTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 23278.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SAKL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to SAKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AMXX has a market cap of 22718.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AMXX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AMXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AMXX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to AMXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AVPI has a market cap of 21490.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AVPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AVPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AVPI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AVPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 20766.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, IFLM has a market cap of 19494.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while IFLM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas IFLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to IFLM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to IFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, NLMP has a market cap of 18998.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while NLMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas NLMP's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to NLMP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to NLMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SONG has a market cap of 16004.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SONG trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SONG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SONG's ROE of -9.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to SONG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, FMYR has a market cap of 14391.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while FMYR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas FMYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to FMYR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to FMYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SNWR has a market cap of 14002.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SNWR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SNWR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SNWR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to SNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HYWI has a market cap of 12675.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HYWI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HYWI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HYWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to HYWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AGAEW has a market cap of 8299.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AGAEW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AGAEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AGAEW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to AGAEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AFTM has a market cap of 7045.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AFTM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AFTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AFTM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to AFTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MVES has a market cap of 5827.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MVES trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MVES's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MVES's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to MVES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TCHC has a market cap of 4463.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TCHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TCHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to TCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HYWS has a market cap of 4362.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HYWS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HYWS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HYWS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to HYWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, FERL has a market cap of 3390.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while FERL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas FERL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to FERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to FERL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, EVLI has a market cap of 3073.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while EVLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas EVLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to EVLI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to EVLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TCEC has a market cap of 3001.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TCEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TCEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TCEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to TCEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, EMWPF has a market cap of 1895.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while EMWPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas EMWPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to EMWPF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to EMWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TIXC has a market cap of 1734.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TIXC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TIXC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TIXC's ROE of +40.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to TIXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SLCH has a market cap of 1550.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SLCH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SLCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SLCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to SLCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, VIDA has a market cap of 1225.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while VIDA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas VIDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to VIDA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to VIDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, EWKS has a market cap of 656.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while EWKS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas EWKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to EWKS's ROE of -14.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to EWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, UOMO has a market cap of 239.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while UOMO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas UOMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to UOMO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to UOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MOCI has a market cap of 122.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MOCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MOCI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MOCI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MOCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, KLOC has a market cap of 11.00. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while KLOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas KLOC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to KLOC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to KLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, LVOPP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while LVOPP trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESGC has daily volatility of 21.92 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, DISCK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while DISCK trades at $24.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RTRK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RTRK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RTRK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to RTRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, AESE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while AESE trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, SWMD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while SWMD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas SWMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to SWMD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to SWMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RDBX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RDBX trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, VIACP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while VIACP trades at $52.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, VIACA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while VIACA trades at $32.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, EMWP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while EMWP trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, KWWMF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while KWWMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas KWWMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to KWWMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to KWWMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RDBXW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, RCCB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while RCCB trades at $180.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas RCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to RCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to RCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, MSGN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while MSGN trades at $14.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, DISCB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while DISCB trades at $24.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, HMTV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while HMTV trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.

ESGC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESGC stands at N/A. In comparison, TGSEF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ESGC is priced at $3.03, while TGSEF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.19, whereas TGSEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESGC's ROE is N/A, compared to TGSEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESGC is more volatile compared to TGSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESGC.