Molecule Holdings Inc.
Molecule Holdings Inc. (ERV2.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ERV2.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERV2.F | €0.00 | N/A | 329.9K | -0.02 | -€0.03 | N/A |
| MRK.DE | €110.20 | +2.61% | 46.8B | 17.93 | €6.00 | +2.04% |
| ZOE.DE | €101.52 | +0.77% | 44.6B | 19.36 | €5.22 | +1.73% |
| 2M7C.F | €1.47 | +0.68% | 3.5B | 18.13 | €0.08 | +2.29% |
| DMP.DE | €46.45 | +5.81% | 2.3B | 19.67 | €2.15 | +2.13% |
| EVT.DE | €4.46 | +4.45% | 762.4M | -4.77 | -€0.90 | N/A |
| 2HQ0.DE | €5.30 | +1.53% | 632.6M | -0.27 | -€20.48 | N/A |
| PSG.DE | €29.00 | +0.00% | 333.9M | 17.26 | €1.68 | +0.17% |
| 21P.F | €2.92 | +7.55% | 163.5M | -3.05 | -€0.93 | N/A |
| HAEK.DE | €21.40 | -1.83% | 111.5M | 11.57 | €1.85 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ERV2.F vs MRK.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, MRK.DE has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while MRK.DE trades at €110.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MRK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MRK.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to MRK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check MRK.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs ZOE.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, ZOE.DE has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while ZOE.DE trades at €101.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZOE.DE's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ZOE.DE's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to ZOE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check ZOE.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs 2M7C.F Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, 2M7C.F has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while 2M7C.F trades at €1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas 2M7C.F's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to 2M7C.F's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to 2M7C.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check 2M7C.F's competition here
ERV2.F vs DMP.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, DMP.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while DMP.DE trades at €46.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DMP.DE's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to DMP.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to DMP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check DMP.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs EVT.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, EVT.DE has a market cap of 762.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while EVT.DE trades at €4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EVT.DE's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to EVT.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to EVT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check EVT.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs 2HQ0.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, 2HQ0.DE has a market cap of 632.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while 2HQ0.DE trades at €5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas 2HQ0.DE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to 2HQ0.DE's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to 2HQ0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check 2HQ0.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs PSG.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, PSG.DE has a market cap of 333.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while PSG.DE trades at €29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PSG.DE's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to PSG.DE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to PSG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check PSG.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs 21P.F Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, 21P.F has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while 21P.F trades at €2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas 21P.F's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to 21P.F's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to 21P.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check 21P.F's competition here
ERV2.F vs HAEK.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, HAEK.DE has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while HAEK.DE trades at €21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HAEK.DE's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to HAEK.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to HAEK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check HAEK.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs APPH.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, APPH.DE has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while APPH.DE trades at €11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas APPH.DE's P/E ratio is 137.50. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to APPH.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F and APPH.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APPH.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs 93M1.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, 93M1.DE has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while 93M1.DE trades at €19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas 93M1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to 93M1.DE's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to 93M1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check 93M1.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs 2HQ.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, 2HQ.DE has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while 2HQ.DE trades at €0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas 2HQ.DE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to 2HQ.DE's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to 2HQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check 2HQ.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs B8F.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, B8F.DE has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while B8F.DE trades at €6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas B8F.DE's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to B8F.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to B8F.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check B8F.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs 21P1.F Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, 21P1.F has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while 21P1.F trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas 21P1.F's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to 21P1.F's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to 21P1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check 21P1.F's competition here
ERV2.F vs HOB0.F Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, HOB0.F has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while HOB0.F trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HOB0.F's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to HOB0.F's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F and HOB0.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOB0.F's competition here
ERV2.F vs B8FK.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, B8FK.DE has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while B8FK.DE trades at €2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas B8FK.DE's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to B8FK.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to B8FK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check B8FK.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs SBX.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, SBX.DE has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while SBX.DE trades at €2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SBX.DE's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SBX.DE's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to SBX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check SBX.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs Z6A.F Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, Z6A.F has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while Z6A.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas Z6A.F's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to Z6A.F's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to Z6A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check Z6A.F's competition here
ERV2.F vs PA8.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, PA8.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while PA8.DE trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PA8.DE's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to PA8.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to PA8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check PA8.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs 2NU.F Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, 2NU.F has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while 2NU.F trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas 2NU.F's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to 2NU.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to 2NU.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check 2NU.F's competition here
ERV2.F vs PA8.F Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, PA8.F has a market cap of 261.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while PA8.F trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PA8.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to PA8.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F and PA8.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PA8.F's competition here
ERV2.F vs BIO1.F Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, BIO1.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while BIO1.F trades at €36.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BIO1.F's P/E ratio is -22.85. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BIO1.F's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F and BIO1.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIO1.F's competition here
ERV2.F vs 4XT.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, 4XT.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while 4XT.DE trades at €0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas 4XT.DE's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to 4XT.DE's ROE of -7.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F and 4XT.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 4XT.DE's competition here
ERV2.F vs MCD.DE Comparison April 2026
ERV2.F plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERV2.F stands at 329.9K. In comparison, MCD.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ERV2.F is priced at €0.00, while MCD.DE trades at €0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERV2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MCD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ERV2.F's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MCD.DE's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ERV2.F is less volatile compared to MCD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERV2.F.Check MCD.DE's competition here