tmc Content Group AG
tmc Content Group AG (ERO1.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ERO1.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERO1.DE | €0.04 | +0.00% | 1.7M | -1.21 | -€0.04 | N/A |
| NFC.DE | €80.71 | +2.28% | 339.2B | 36.68 | €2.19 | N/A |
| WDP.DE | €84.36 | -2.18% | 151.1B | 14.55 | €5.86 | +1.25% |
| WDP.F | €83.98 | -2.62% | 150.6B | 14.48 | €5.87 | +1.25% |
| R35.F | €83.78 | +4.24% | 12.5B | 166.57 | €0.51 | N/A |
| MGG.DE | €36.95 | +12.38% | 11.4B | 13.78 | €2.72 | N/A |
| EVD.DE | €63.15 | +0.08% | 6.1B | 21.15 | €2.99 | +2.62% |
| VVU.DE | €1.68 | -2.67% | 1.7B | 84.60 | €0.02 | +2.36% |
| BVB.DE | €2.97 | +0.17% | 327.8M | 18.56 | €0.16 | +2.02% |
| EDL.DE | €5.60 | -0.88% | 111.7M | 8.75 | €0.60 | +5.71% |
Stock Comparison
ERO1.DE vs NFC.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, NFC.DE has a market cap of 339.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while NFC.DE trades at €80.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas NFC.DE's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NFC.DE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to NFC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check NFC.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs WDP.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, WDP.DE has a market cap of 151.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while WDP.DE trades at €84.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas WDP.DE's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WDP.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to WDP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check WDP.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs WDP.F Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, WDP.F has a market cap of 150.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while WDP.F trades at €83.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas WDP.F's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WDP.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to WDP.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check WDP.F's competition here
ERO1.DE vs R35.F Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, R35.F has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while R35.F trades at €83.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas R35.F's P/E ratio is 166.57. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to R35.F's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to R35.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check R35.F's competition here
ERO1.DE vs MGG.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, MGG.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while MGG.DE trades at €36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas MGG.DE's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MGG.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to MGG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check MGG.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs EVD.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, EVD.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while EVD.DE trades at €63.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas EVD.DE's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EVD.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to EVD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check EVD.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs VVU.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, VVU.DE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while VVU.DE trades at €1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas VVU.DE's P/E ratio is 84.60. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VVU.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to VVU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check VVU.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs BVB.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, BVB.DE has a market cap of 327.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while BVB.DE trades at €2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas BVB.DE's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BVB.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to BVB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check BVB.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs EDL.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, EDL.DE has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while EDL.DE trades at €5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas EDL.DE's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EDL.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to EDL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check EDL.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs LOUD.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, LOUD.DE has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while LOUD.DE trades at €3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas LOUD.DE's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LOUD.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to LOUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check LOUD.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs HLG.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, HLG.DE has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while HLG.DE trades at €1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas HLG.DE's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HLG.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to HLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check HLG.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs PAL.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, PAL.DE has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while PAL.DE trades at €0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas PAL.DE's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PAL.DE's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to PAL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check PAL.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs CLIQ.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CLIQ.DE has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while CLIQ.DE trades at €2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas CLIQ.DE's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CLIQ.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to CLIQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check CLIQ.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs SPM.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, SPM.DE has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while SPM.DE trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas SPM.DE's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SPM.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to SPM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check SPM.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs ITN.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, ITN.DE has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while ITN.DE trades at €0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas ITN.DE's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ITN.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to ITN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check ITN.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs IQ50.F Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, IQ50.F has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while IQ50.F trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas IQ50.F's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IQ50.F's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to IQ50.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check IQ50.F's competition here
ERO1.DE vs WIG1.DE Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, WIG1.DE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while WIG1.DE trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas WIG1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WIG1.DE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to WIG1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check WIG1.DE's competition here
ERO1.DE vs WIG1.F Comparison March 2026
ERO1.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO1.DE stands at 1.7M. In comparison, WIG1.F has a market cap of 88.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ERO1.DE is priced at €0.04, while WIG1.F trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas WIG1.F's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ERO1.DE's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WIG1.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO1.DE is more volatile compared to WIG1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO1.DE.Check WIG1.F's competition here