ERAMET S.A.

ERA.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERA.PA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XVALO.MC has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.PA is priced at €51.45, while XVALO.MC trades at €8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 102.90, whereas XVALO.MC's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, ERA.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XVALO.MC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.PA is more volatile compared to XVALO.MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.PA.

ERA.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERA.PA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMG.AS has a market cap of 613.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.PA is priced at €51.45, while AMG.AS trades at €19.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 102.90, whereas AMG.AS's P/E ratio is -57.61. In terms of profitability, ERA.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMG.AS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.PA is less volatile compared to AMG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.PA.

ERA.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERA.PA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KMR.IR has a market cap of 402.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.PA is priced at €51.45, while KMR.IR trades at €4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 102.90, whereas KMR.IR's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, ERA.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KMR.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.PA is less volatile compared to KMR.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.PA.

ERA.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERA.PA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RX.PA has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.PA is priced at €51.45, while RX.PA trades at €1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 102.90, whereas RX.PA's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, ERA.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RX.PA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.PA is less volatile compared to RX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.PA.

ERA.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERA.PA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MLZAM.PA has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.PA is priced at €51.45, while MLZAM.PA trades at €1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 102.90, whereas MLZAM.PA's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, ERA.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLZAM.PA's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.PA is less volatile compared to MLZAM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.PA.

ERA.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERA.PA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NYR.BR has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.PA is priced at €51.45, while NYR.BR trades at €0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 102.90, whereas NYR.BR's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, ERA.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NYR.BR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.PA is less volatile compared to NYR.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.PA.

ERA.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERA.PA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORQ1.IR has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.PA is priced at €51.45, while ORQ1.IR trades at €0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 102.90, whereas ORQ1.IR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERA.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORQ1.IR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.PA is less volatile compared to ORQ1.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.PA.

ERA.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERA.PA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MLSUM.PA has a market cap of 102K. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.PA is priced at €51.45, while MLSUM.PA trades at €0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 102.90, whereas MLSUM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERA.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLSUM.PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.PA is more volatile compared to MLSUM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.PA.

ERA.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERA.PA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8GW.IR has a market cap of 52.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.PA is priced at €51.45, while 8GW.IR trades at €0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 102.90, whereas 8GW.IR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ERA.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 8GW.IR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.PA is less volatile compared to 8GW.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.PA.