Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF EQGB.L Peers
See (EQGB.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQGB.L | £41,512.50 | -0.34% | 974.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UC65.L | £59.21 | -0.40% | 5.1T | N/A | N/A | +1.69% |
| UB02.L | £4,354.00 | -0.49% | 3.7T | N/A | N/A | +1.83% |
| IUSA.L | £4,401.50 | -0.40% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +1.09% |
| SSAC.L | £6,996.00 | -0.61% | 1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,311.00 | -1.03% | 836.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESC.L | £7,802.00 | -1.50% | 775.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,736.50 | -1.49% | 774.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.76% |
| MEUD.L | £22,140.00 | -1.09% | 765.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IITU.L | £2,533.00 | -0.78% | 732.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EQGB.L vs UC65.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while UC65.L trades at £59.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to UC65.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs UB02.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while UB02.L trades at £4,354.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IUSA.L trades at £4,401.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while SSAC.L trades at £6,996.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 836.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while SMEA.L trades at £7,311.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XESC.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 775.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XESC.L trades at £7,802.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XESX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 774.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XESX.L trades at £4,736.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 765.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while MEUD.L trades at £22,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IITU.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 732.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IITU.L trades at £2,533.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 689.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while UB0D.L trades at £2,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs JT13.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 669.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while JT13.L trades at £594.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 628.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CNAL.L trades at £11,123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 562.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while JPSR.L trades at £1,965.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 541.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IWRD.L trades at £6,137.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 524.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XDAX.L trades at £18,742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 512.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while PHGP.L trades at £23,477.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 499.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while GLDA.L trades at £9,998.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 476.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XMMS.L trades at £4,682.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 457B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while MXWS.L trades at £9,055.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 432.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XMUS.L trades at £13,159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs UC44.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 419.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while UC44.L trades at £12,649.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 414.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XMEU.L trades at £8,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CS51.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 407B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CS51.L trades at £17,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs EUE.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 364.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while EUE.L trades at £4,628.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 360.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IEEM.L trades at £3,418.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs UB32.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 343.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while UB32.L trades at £8,760.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CACX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 336.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CACX.L trades at £6,579.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 304.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while GBSS.L trades at £23,116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 301.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XSX6.L trades at £11,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 298B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while SEMA.L trades at £3,233.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 287.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 279.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while SGBX.L trades at £24,128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 269B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IWFV.L trades at £3,608.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 247.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while ISPY.L trades at £2,311.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 233B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CEA1.L trades at £14,744.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 221.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while RBTX.L trades at £1,061.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 220.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 220.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while JRDE.L trades at £3,673.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs JERE.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 220.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while JERE.L trades at £3,909.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs SUES.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 217.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while SUES.L trades at £600.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 207.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while PHSP.L trades at £2,439.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 198.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IUQF.L trades at £1,101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 193.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while HMEF.L trades at £875.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 192.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IWFM.L trades at £6,486.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 182B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XDEV.L trades at £3,723.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while SOYU.L trades at £306.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 171.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while SPGP.L trades at £1,837.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 169.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CEUR.L trades at £30,915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 163.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while UIFS.L trades at £1,078.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 163.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XXSC.L trades at £5,472.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,376.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while GBSP.L trades at £1,764.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 149.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while PRIR.L trades at £1,478.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IEFV.L trades at £863.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CU1.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 139B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CU1.L trades at £45,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 135.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while ISP6.L trades at £6,405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs WATL.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while WATL.L trades at £5,774.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs GILS.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while GILS.L trades at £10,185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 131.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IPRP.L trades at £2,617.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 129.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XZEU.L trades at £2,805.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CUS1.L trades at £37,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 126.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XCX6.L trades at £1,320.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs UC79.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 121.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while UC79.L trades at £1,125.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs INFL.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while INFL.L trades at £9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 118.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while SP5G.L trades at £203.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 63.47. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while 0GWB.IL trades at £471.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CSPX.L trades at £641.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CG1.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CG1.L trades at £35,495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CB5.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CB5.L trades at £3,830.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IJPN.L trades at £1,384.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XRSG.L trades at £22,887.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IGSG.L trades at £5,876.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 108.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while PRIC.L trades at £1,617.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while JRDM.L trades at £2,331.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while SPEX.L trades at £4,411.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs SPES.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while SPES.L trades at £4,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XDEM.L trades at £5,459.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs H50E.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while H50E.L trades at £4,812.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while RIEG.L trades at £1,437.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IWDA.L trades at £114.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IEUX.L trades at £3,991.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IMV.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IMV.L trades at £5,753.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while DAXX.L trades at £18,282.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CSCA.L trades at £17,253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while MTIX.L trades at £14,210.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,388.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs UB45.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while UB45.L trades at £6,088.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XDN0.L trades at £4,293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IUKD.L trades at £831.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while WQDS.L trades at £547.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs COMM.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while COMM.L trades at £549.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while EQDS.L trades at £544.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CRPX.L trades at £12,995.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XLKQ.L trades at £52,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while CSP1.L trades at £47,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while IGUS.L trades at £13,733.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while XDEB.L trades at £3,588.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs GLDW.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, GLDW.L has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while GLDW.L trades at £25,057.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to GLDW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L vs INAA.L Comparison
EQGB.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQGB.L stands at 974.4B. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, EQGB.L is priced at £41,512.50, while INAA.L trades at £8,209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQGB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQGB.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQGB.L is less volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQGB.L.