Bottomline Technologies, Inc.
Bottomline Technologies, Inc. EPAY Peers
See (EPAY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAY | $56.99 | N/A | N/A | -113.53 | -$0.50 | N/A |
| MSFT | $449.26 | +2.40% | 3.34T | 34.67 | $12.96 | +0.71% |
| ORCL | $157.24 | +4.59% | 440.94B | 36.91 | $4.26 | +1.08% |
| PLTR | $118.46 | +0.99% | 279.55B | 515.04 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $395.94 | +3.30% | 168.75B | 26.17 | $15.13 | N/A |
| PANW | $193.50 | +3.51% | 128.12B | 109.32 | $1.77 | N/A |
| CRWD | $429.44 | +4.60% | 106.96B | -5368.00 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| SNPS | $505.59 | +4.70% | 78.17B | 60.84 | $8.31 | N/A |
| FTNT | $102.04 | +4.74% | 78.10B | 45.15 | $2.26 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.52B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EPAY vs MSFT Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.34T. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while MSFT trades at $449.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs ORCL Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 440.94B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while ORCL trades at $157.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs PLTR Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 279.55B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while PLTR trades at $118.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 515.04. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs ADBE Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 168.75B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while ADBE trades at $395.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs PANW Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 128.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while PANW trades at $193.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 109.32. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CRWD Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 106.96B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CRWD trades at $429.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -5368.00. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs SNPS Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 78.17B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while SNPS trades at $505.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 60.84. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs FTNT Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 78.10B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while FTNT trades at $102.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 45.15. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs VMW Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.52B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs SQ Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.73B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs HOOD Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 50.68B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while HOOD trades at $57.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs NET Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 49.47B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while NET trades at $142.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -619.31. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs ZS Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 37.36B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while ZS trades at $241.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2683.11. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs XYZ Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 33.84B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while XYZ trades at $55.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs NETE Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.82B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CRWV Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 27.22B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CRWV trades at $58.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -25.21. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRWV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs GDDY Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 26.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while GDDY trades at $186.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs SPLK Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.44B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs VRSN Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.25B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while VRSN trades at $279.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.14. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs IOT Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 25.76B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while IOT trades at $45.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -161.61. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs TOST Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.78B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while TOST trades at $42.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 1429.50. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CPAY Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 24.57B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CPAY trades at $349.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CHKP Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.54B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CHKP trades at $217.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs FLT Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.79B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs OKTA Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 20.59B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while OKTA trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 2069.50. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs NTNX Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 20.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while NTNX trades at $76.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -295.58. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CYBR Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 18.18B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CYBR trades at $367.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -172.61. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs GEN Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.91B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while GEN trades at $29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs AFRM Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 17.34B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while AFRM trades at $53.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -86.68. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs FFIV Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.10B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while FFIV trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs KSPI Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.81B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while KSPI trades at $83.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs MDB Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.56B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while MDB trades at $191.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -110.76. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs RBRK Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 14.92B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while RBRK trades at $78.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -10.51. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs NLOK Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs AKAM Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.51B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while AKAM trades at $78.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs SAIL Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.04B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while SAIL trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs DOX Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.35B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while DOX trades at $92.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs WIX Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 10.00B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while WIX trades at $179.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 76.15. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs KVYO Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.90B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while KVYO trades at $35.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -211.06. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs ALTR Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs PLAN Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs DBX Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.43B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while DBX trades at $29.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CFLT Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 7.60B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CFLT trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -23.03. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs PATH Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while PATH trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -100.65. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs HCP Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs JCOM Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs INFA Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while INFA trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 646.33. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs SQSP Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs S Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while S trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas S's P/E ratio is -21.86. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs NEWR Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs FOUR Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while FOUR trades at $90.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CCCS Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CCCS trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 909.00. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs SPSC Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while SPSC trades at $151.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 70.97. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs VRNS Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while VRNS trades at $45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -56.59. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs ACIW Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.11B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while ACIW trades at $48.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs RELY Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.99B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while RELY trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -128.89. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs QLYS Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while QLYS trades at $136.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs NVEI Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs EEFT Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.81B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while EEFT trades at $111.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CLBT Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CLBT trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs BOX Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while BOX trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs WEX Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.63B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while WEX trades at $135.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs TENB Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while TENB trades at $33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -88.11. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs ODD Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while ODD trades at $70.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 40.28. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs ESMT Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs AVPT Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while AVPT trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -118.06. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs STNE Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while STNE trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs PAGS Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while PAGS trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs SWI Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs EVOP Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CORZZ Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CORZZ trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CORZ Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CORZ trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs DOCN Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while DOCN trades at $31.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs DLO Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while DLO trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs PAYO Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while PAYO trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs APPN Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while APPN trades at $32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -25.61. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APPN's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs EVTC Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while EVTC trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs BB Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while BB trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -388.50. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs TDC Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while TDC trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs MQ Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while MQ trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 93.00. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs FIVN Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while FIVN trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -467.50. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs EVCM Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while EVCM trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -51.68. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs GETVV Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs AVDX Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while AVDX trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 243.00. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs FORG Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs RAMP Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while RAMP trades at $29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -732.00. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CSGS Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CSGS trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs GSKY Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs GET Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs RPD Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while RPD trades at $26.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 66.85. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RPD's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs NTCT Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while NTCT trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs STER Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs ZUO Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs AVPTW Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while AVPTW trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs SUMO Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs GB Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while GB trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs CORZW Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while CORZW trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs TUYA Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while TUYA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 257.50. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.
EPAY vs PAYA Comparison
EPAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAY stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAY is priced at $56.99, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAY currently has a P/E ratio of -113.53, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, EPAY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAY is less volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAY.