Enova Systems, Inc.
Enova Systems, Inc. ENVS Peers
See (ENVS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENVS | $0.00 | N/A | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.1B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +0.57% |
| DNZOF | $14.39 | -10.88% | 40.5B | 14.25 | $1.01 | +3.39% |
| DNZOY | $13.36 | -0.16% | 37.6B | 13.23 | $1.01 | +0.93% |
| BRDCY | $21.39 | -1.11% | 29B | 15.28 | $1.40 | +2.07% |
| BRDCF | $42.40 | N/A | 28.7B | 15.25 | $2.78 | +3.11% |
| MGDDY | $19.10 | +0.21% | 27B | 8.55 | $2.23 | +3.95% |
| MGDDF | $37.78 | N/A | 26.7B | 3.38 | $11.17 | +4.12% |
| CTTAF | $87.83 | -2.30% | 17.6B | 13.27 | $6.62 | +2.94% |
| CTTAY | $8.70 | +0.93% | 17.4B | 13.18 | $0.66 | +2.89% |
Stock Comparison
ENVS vs FYGGY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and FYGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs DNZOF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while DNZOF trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs DNZOY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while DNZOY trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs BRDCY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while BRDCY trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs BRDCF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while BRDCF trades at $42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs MGDDY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while MGDDY trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs MGDDF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while MGDDF trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs CTTAF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while CTTAF trades at $87.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs CTTAY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while CTTAY trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs KNRRY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while KNRRY trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs SMTOY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while SMTOY trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs KNBHF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while KNBHF trades at $95.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs PTAIY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while PTAIY trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs PTAIF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs HLLGY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs HLKHF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs ASEKY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while ASEKY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs ASEKF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and ASEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs NGKSY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NGKSY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and NGKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs PLLIF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while PLLIF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs NGKSF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs SFFLY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while SFFLY trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs YORUF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and YORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs FESTF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs YORUY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while YORUY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs BRBOY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs KOTMY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while KOTMY trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs SCFLF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs KOTMF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs MNTHY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while MNTHY trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and MNTHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs BRBOF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while BRBOF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs STAEY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs SMTUF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and SMTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs LIMAF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while LIMAF trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs STAEF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while STAEF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and STAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs VLEEY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while VLEEY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs TDBOF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and TDBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs NHKGF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs VLEEF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while VLEEF trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs VTSCF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and VTSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs MNTHF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs NPSKF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs NPSKY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NPSKY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs TGOSY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs ARBFF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs JELCF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while JELCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs JEHLY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and JEHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs MBUMY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while MBUMY trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs MBUMF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs GMPUF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and GMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs UNIEF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs NTXVF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs GUDDY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs FURCF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while FURCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs PASTF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs NIFCY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and NIFCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs NKRKY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NKRKY trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -25.73. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and NKRKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs NKRKF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -23.98. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs TIANF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs GUDHF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 867.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs SFHLF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 848M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while SFHLF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs ATNNF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs ABDDF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and ABDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs FAURY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 689.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and FAURY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs FCVFF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and FCVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs NMAKF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 475.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NMAKF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -16.27. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs MRETF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 430.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while MRETF trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs TCISF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and TCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs SAEOF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and SAEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs VTSCY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and VTSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs PWRHF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs ELLRY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while ELLRY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and ELLRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs EGKLF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs NPSGF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs NPSGY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs IOCJY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and IOCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs XNGIF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and XNGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs AKBIF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs EXCOF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while EXCOF trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs AMGRF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs HWAFF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and HWAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs WLMTF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs KGAUF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs SCTH Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while SCTH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and SCTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs CAOHF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and CAOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs LEAT Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while LEAT trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -174.80. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs STSGF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and STSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs NWFAF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and NWFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs VOAXF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and VOAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs CREVF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and CREVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs CCEGF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs CMMCF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs ATHHF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while ATHHF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs UFMG Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and UFMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs AFFL Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs OPTI Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs AMTY Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENVS.
ENVS vs NFGRF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and NFGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ENVS vs SPKTF Comparison
ENVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENVS stands at 0. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENVS is priced at $0.00, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENVS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, ENVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENVS and SPKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).