Entain Plc
Entain Plc ENT.L Peers
See (ENT.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENT.L | $790.80 | +3.51% | 5.06B | -11.14 | -$0.71 | +2.35% |
| FLTR.L | $18,605.00 | +1.00% | 32.87B | 85.34 | $2.18 | N/A |
| 0A37.L | $183.60 | +0.59% | 25.23B | 245.78 | $0.75 | +6.49% |
| 0ABA.L | $50.93 | +21.26% | 17.07B | -12.57 | -$4.05 | N/A |
| 0JWC.L | $34.73 | -0.46% | 9.45B | 11.06 | $3.14 | N/A |
| 0LK3.L | $148.62 | -1.36% | 5.55B | 19.19 | $7.75 | +5.97% |
| 0EAW.L | $188.69 | N/A | 3.14B | 160.58 | $1.18 | N/A |
| 0O80.L | $102.78 | +2.25% | 2.52B | 342.60 | $0.30 | +1.46% |
| PTEC.L | $367.00 | +1.94% | 1.13B | 22.94 | $0.16 | +1.31% |
| RNK.L | $113.00 | +6.81% | 529.33M | 16.14 | $0.07 | +1.33% |
Stock Comparison
ENT.L vs FLTR.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, FLTR.L has a market cap of 32.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while FLTR.L trades at $18,605.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas FLTR.L's P/E ratio is 85.34. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FLTR.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to FLTR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs 0A37.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, 0A37.L has a market cap of 25.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while 0A37.L trades at $183.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas 0A37.L's P/E ratio is 245.78. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to 0A37.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to 0A37.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs 0ABA.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, 0ABA.L has a market cap of 17.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while 0ABA.L trades at $50.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas 0ABA.L's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to 0ABA.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to 0ABA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs 0JWC.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, 0JWC.L has a market cap of 9.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while 0JWC.L trades at $34.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas 0JWC.L's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to 0JWC.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to 0JWC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs 0LK3.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, 0LK3.L has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while 0LK3.L trades at $148.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas 0LK3.L's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to 0LK3.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to 0LK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs 0EAW.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, 0EAW.L has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while 0EAW.L trades at $188.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas 0EAW.L's P/E ratio is 160.58. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to 0EAW.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to 0EAW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs 0O80.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, 0O80.L has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while 0O80.L trades at $102.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas 0O80.L's P/E ratio is 342.60. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to 0O80.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to 0O80.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs PTEC.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, PTEC.L has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while PTEC.L trades at $367.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas PTEC.L's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PTEC.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to PTEC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs RNK.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, RNK.L has a market cap of 529.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while RNK.L trades at $113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas RNK.L's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RNK.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is less volatile compared to RNK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs 888.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, 888.L has a market cap of 383.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while 888.L trades at $85.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas 888.L's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to 888.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to 888.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs EVOK.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, EVOK.L has a market cap of 242.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while EVOK.L trades at $54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas EVOK.L's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EVOK.L's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is less volatile compared to EVOK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs GMR.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, GMR.L has a market cap of 142.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while GMR.L trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas GMR.L's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GMR.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is less volatile compared to GMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs BOTB.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, BOTB.L has a market cap of 45.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while BOTB.L trades at $532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas BOTB.L's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BOTB.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to BOTB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs CMX.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, CMX.L has a market cap of 9.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while CMX.L trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas CMX.L's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CMX.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to CMX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs B90.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, B90.L has a market cap of 9.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while B90.L trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas B90.L's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to B90.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to B90.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs SPO.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, SPO.L has a market cap of 8.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while SPO.L trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas SPO.L's P/E ratio is -16.80. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SPO.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ENT.L has daily volatility of 4.67 and SPO.L has daily volatility of N/A.
ENT.L vs TNT.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, TNT.L has a market cap of 5.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while TNT.L trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas TNT.L's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TNT.L's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ENT.L has daily volatility of 4.67 and TNT.L has daily volatility of N/A.
ENT.L vs MIN.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, MIN.L has a market cap of 1.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while MIN.L trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas MIN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MIN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is more volatile compared to MIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.
ENT.L vs WEB.L Comparison
ENT.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENT.L stands at 5.06B. In comparison, WEB.L has a market cap of 295003.00. Regarding current trading prices, ENT.L is priced at $790.80, while WEB.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.14, whereas WEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENT.L's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WEB.L's ROE of +5.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ENT.L is less volatile compared to WEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENT.L.