E Split Corp.

ENS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS.TO stands at 315.32M. In comparison, HBF.TO has a market cap of 400.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS.TO is priced at $14.17, while HBF.TO trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas HBF.TO's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, ENS.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS.TO is more volatile compared to HBF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.TO.

ENS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS.TO stands at 315.32M. In comparison, URB-A.CN has a market cap of 235.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS.TO is priced at $14.17, while URB-A.CN trades at $5.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas URB-A.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to URB-A.CN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS.TO is more volatile compared to URB-A.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.TO.

ENS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS.TO stands at 315.32M. In comparison, FIG.TO has a market cap of 157.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS.TO is priced at $14.17, while FIG.TO trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas FIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS.TO is more volatile compared to FIG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.TO.

ENS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS.TO stands at 315.32M. In comparison, HPF.TO has a market cap of 32.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS.TO is priced at $14.17, while HPF.TO trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas HPF.TO's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, ENS.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HPF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS.TO is more volatile compared to HPF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.TO.