Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.50% Series due April 1, 2066
Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ENO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENO | $21.92 | +0.57% | 184.9M | N/A | N/A | +6.27% |
| NEE | $71.85 | -0.17% | 148B | 25.05 | $2.87 | +3.02% |
| SOJE | $17.90 | +1.42% | 105.9B | N/A | N/A | +3.04% |
| SOJD | $20.46 | +0.94% | 105.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.04% |
| SO | $95.35 | +0.37% | 104.9B | 22.88 | $4.17 | +3.04% |
| SOJC | $22.10 | +0.41% | 104.8B | 26.26 | $0.84 | +3.04% |
| DUK | $119.93 | +0.15% | 93.2B | 19.92 | $6.02 | +3.48% |
| DUK-PA | $24.72 | +0.00% | 92.8B | 5.19 | $4.76 | +3.48% |
| DUKB | $23.91 | +0.04% | 92.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.48% |
| NEE-PR | $41.46 | +0.07% | 85.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.02% |
Stock Comparison
ENO vs NEE Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while NEE trades at $71.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check NEE's competition here
ENO vs SOJE Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while SOJE trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check SOJE's competition here
ENO vs SOJD Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while SOJD trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check SOJD's competition here
ENO vs SO Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while SO trades at $95.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check SO's competition here
ENO vs SOJC Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 104.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while SOJC trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check SOJC's competition here
ENO vs DUK Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DUK trades at $119.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DUK's competition here
ENO vs DUK-PA Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DUK-PA trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DUK-PA's competition here
ENO vs DUKB Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DUKB trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DUKB's competition here
ENO vs NEE-PR Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while NEE-PR trades at $41.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check NEE-PR's competition here
ENO vs NGG Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while NGG trades at $72.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check NGG's competition here
ENO vs AEP Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while AEP trades at $109.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check AEP's competition here
ENO vs SREA Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while SREA trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check SREA's competition here
ENO vs D Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, D has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while D trades at $58.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to D's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check D's competition here
ENO vs NEE-PN Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while NEE-PN trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check NEE-PN's competition here
ENO vs EXC Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while EXC trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check EXC's competition here
ENO vs PEG Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PEG trades at $87.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PEG's competition here
ENO vs XEL Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while XEL trades at $72.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check XEL's competition here
ENO vs EXCVV Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check EXCVV's competition here
ENO vs ELC Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while ELC trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check ELC's competition here
ENO vs ETR Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while ETR trades at $88.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check ETR's competition here
ENO vs ED Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while ED trades at $102.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check ED's competition here
ENO vs WEC Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while WEC trades at $109.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check WEC's competition here
ENO vs PCG Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PCG trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PCG's competition here
ENO vs DTE Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DTE trades at $139.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DTE's competition here
ENO vs DTB Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DTB trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DTB's competition here
ENO vs DTW Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DTW trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DTW's competition here
ENO vs DTG Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DTG trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DTG's competition here
ENO vs AEE Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while AEE trades at $100.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check AEE's competition here
ENO vs PPL Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PPL trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PPL's competition here
ENO vs FTS Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while FTS trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check FTS's competition here
ENO vs ES Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while ES trades at $66.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check ES's competition here
ENO vs FE Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while FE trades at $41.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check FE's competition here
ENO vs DTY Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DTY's competition here
ENO vs CMSD Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while CMSD trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check CMSD's competition here
ENO vs CMSC Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while CMSC trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check CMSC's competition here
ENO vs CMSA Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while CMSA trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check CMSA's competition here
ENO vs CMS Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while CMS trades at $72.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check CMS's competition here
ENO vs EIX Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while EIX trades at $52.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check EIX's competition here
ENO vs AQNB Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while AQNB trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check AQNB's competition here
ENO vs KEP Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while KEP trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check KEP's competition here
ENO vs LNT Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while LNT trades at $64.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check LNT's competition here
ENO vs EBR-B Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while EBR-B trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check EBR-B's competition here
ENO vs EVRG Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while EVRG trades at $69.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check EVRG's competition here
ENO vs EBR Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while EBR trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check EBR's competition here
ENO vs AGR Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check AGR's competition here
ENO vs OKLO Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while OKLO trades at $75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -160.61. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check OKLO's competition here
ENO vs PNW Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PNW trades at $90.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PNW's competition here
ENO vs OGE Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while OGE trades at $44.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check OGE's competition here
ENO vs IDA Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while IDA trades at $123.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check IDA's competition here
ENO vs CMS-PB Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while CMS-PB trades at $77.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check CMS-PB's competition here
ENO vs TXNM Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while TXNM trades at $57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check TXNM's competition here
ENO vs PCG-PA Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PCG-PA trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PCG-PA's competition here
ENO vs CMS-PC Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while CMS-PC trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check CMS-PC's competition here
ENO vs PCG-PB Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PCG-PB trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PCG-PB's competition here
ENO vs PCG-PC Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PCG-PC trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PCG-PC's competition here
ENO vs PCG-PD Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PCG-PD trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PCG-PD's competition here
ENO vs PCG-PE Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PCG-PE trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PCG-PE's competition here
ENO vs POR Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while POR trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check POR's competition here
ENO vs ENIC Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while ENIC trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check ENIC's competition here
ENO vs DTJ Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DTJ's competition here
ENO vs PCG-PG Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PCG-PG trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PCG-PG's competition here
ENO vs PNM Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PNM's competition here
ENO vs CEPU Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while CEPU trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check CEPU's competition here
ENO vs EDN Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while EDN trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check EDN's competition here
ENO vs ETI-P Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while ETI-P trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check ETI-P's competition here
ENO vs EAI Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 968.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while EAI trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check EAI's competition here
ENO vs GNE Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 533.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while GNE trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check GNE's competition here
ENO vs SPKE Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check SPKE's competition here
ENO vs SPKEP Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check SPKEP's competition here
ENO vs GNE-PA Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check GNE-PA's competition here
ENO vs GPJA Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 198.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while GPJA trades at $21.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check GPJA's competition here
ENO vs EMP Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while EMP trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check EMP's competition here
ENO vs ENJ Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 175.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while ENJ trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check ENJ's competition here
ENO vs VIASP Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while VIASP trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check VIASP's competition here
ENO vs VIA Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while VIA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check VIA's competition here
ENO vs DTP Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DTP trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DTP's competition here
ENO vs NEE-PP Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check NEE-PP's competition here
ENO vs CNP-PB Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, CNP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check CNP-PB's competition here
ENO vs AEPPZ Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check AEPPZ's competition here
ENO vs ALP-PQ Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check ALP-PQ's competition here
ENO vs DCUE Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while DCUE trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check DCUE's competition here
ENO vs PCGU Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while PCGU trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check PCGU's competition here
ENO vs IPLDP Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check IPLDP's competition here
ENO vs NEE-PQ Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check NEE-PQ's competition here
ENO vs ENIA Comparison July 2025
ENO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENO stands at 184.9M. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENO is priced at $21.92, while ENIA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, ENO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENO is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENO.Check ENIA's competition here