Energy Income Fund
Energy Income Fund ENI-UN.TO Peers
See (ENI-UN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENI-UN.TO | $1.53 | N/A | 4.30M | 15.30 | $0.10 | +7.84% |
| BNC.TO | $28.31 | +0.32% | 8.56B | 13.94 | $2.03 | +9.03% |
| EIT-UN.TO | $15.59 | +0.65% | 2.83B | 21.07 | $0.74 | +8.09% |
| NUBF.TO | $21.20 | +0.52% | 2.45B | 14.61 | $1.45 | +4.23% |
| NREA.TO | $24.37 | +1.08% | 1.36B | 21.31 | $1.14 | +1.91% |
| PFIA.TO | $10.07 | -0.20% | 1.31B | N/A | N/A | +3.75% |
| AD-UN.TO | $18.66 | +0.48% | 847.48M | 4.63 | $4.03 | +7.26% |
| MKB.TO | $19.26 | -0.05% | 813.72M | N/A | N/A | +3.65% |
| FIE.TO | $8.45 | +0.36% | 801.06M | 13.45 | $0.63 | +5.67% |
| HDIF.TO | $8.30 | +0.85% | 411.39M | 19.64 | $0.42 | +10.63% |
Stock Comparison
ENI-UN.TO vs BNC.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 8.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while BNC.TO trades at $28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs EIT-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, EIT-UN.TO has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while EIT-UN.TO trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas EIT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EIT-UN.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to EIT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs NUBF.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, NUBF.TO has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while NUBF.TO trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas NUBF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NUBF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to NUBF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs NREA.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while NREA.TO trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to NREA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs PFIA.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, PFIA.TO has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while PFIA.TO trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas PFIA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PFIA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PFIA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs AD-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, AD-UN.TO has a market cap of 847.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while AD-UN.TO trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas AD-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AD-UN.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to AD-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs MKB.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, MKB.TO has a market cap of 813.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while MKB.TO trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas MKB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MKB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MKB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs FIE.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, FIE.TO has a market cap of 801.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while FIE.TO trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas FIE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FIE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FIE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs HDIF.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, HDIF.TO has a market cap of 411.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while HDIF.TO trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas HDIF.TO's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HDIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HDIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs XTR.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, XTR.TO has a market cap of 351.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while XTR.TO trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas XTR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XTR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XTR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs CIC.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, CIC.TO has a market cap of 245.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while CIC.TO trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas CIC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs VCIP.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, VCIP.TO has a market cap of 226.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while VCIP.TO trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas VCIP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VCIP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to VCIP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs IFRF.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, IFRF.TO has a market cap of 197.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while IFRF.TO trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas IFRF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IFRF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to IFRF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs CCOR.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, CCOR.TO has a market cap of 170.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while CCOR.TO trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas CCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CCOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs PBY-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, PBY-UN.TO has a market cap of 142.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while PBY-UN.TO trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas PBY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PBY-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PBY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs ZMI.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, ZMI.TO has a market cap of 126.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while ZMI.TO trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas ZMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZMI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to ZMI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs MGB.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, MGB.TO has a market cap of 116.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while MGB.TO trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas MGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs HUBL.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, HUBL.TO has a market cap of 114.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while HUBL.TO trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas HUBL.TO's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HUBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HUBL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs FAP.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, FAP.TO has a market cap of 108.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while FAP.TO trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas FAP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FAP.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FAP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs MID-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, MID-UN.TO has a market cap of 101.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while MID-UN.TO trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas MID-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MID-UN.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MID-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs PLDI.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, PLDI.TO has a market cap of 98.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while PLDI.TO trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas PLDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PLDI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs BMAX.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, BMAX.TO has a market cap of 92.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while BMAX.TO trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas BMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs PIC-A.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, PIC-A.TO has a market cap of 87.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while PIC-A.TO trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas PIC-A.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PIC-A.TO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PIC-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs TLF.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, TLF.TO has a market cap of 83.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while TLF.TO trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas TLF.TO's P/E ratio is 35.72. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to TLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs BGI-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, BGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 81.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while BGI-UN.TO trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas BGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BGI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs XINC.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, XINC.TO has a market cap of 74.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while XINC.TO trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas XINC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XINC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XINC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs FFI-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, FFI-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while FFI-UN.TO trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas FFI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FFI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FFI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs HTAE.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, HTAE.TO has a market cap of 71.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while HTAE.TO trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas HTAE.TO's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HTAE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HTAE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs RBN-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, RBN-UN.TO has a market cap of 59.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while RBN-UN.TO trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas RBN-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RBN-UN.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to RBN-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs XSC.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, XSC.TO has a market cap of 59.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while XSC.TO trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas XSC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XSC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs HGR.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, HGR.TO has a market cap of 56.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while HGR.TO trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas HGR.TO's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs HHLE.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, HHLE.TO has a market cap of 56.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while HHLE.TO trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas HHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HHLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HHLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs XSI.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, XSI.TO has a market cap of 44.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while XSI.TO trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas XSI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XSI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XSI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs SKG-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, SKG-UN.TO has a market cap of 36.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while SKG-UN.TO trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas SKG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to SKG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs FCGI.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, FCGI.TO has a market cap of 31.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while FCGI.TO trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas FCGI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FCGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FCGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs RIFI.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, RIFI.TO has a market cap of 27.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while RIFI.TO trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas RIFI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RIFI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to RIFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs INC-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, INC-UN.TO has a market cap of 26.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while INC-UN.TO trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas INC-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INC-UN.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to INC-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs EARN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, EARN.TO has a market cap of 25.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while EARN.TO trades at $48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas EARN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EARN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to EARN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs PIN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, PIN.TO has a market cap of 16.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while PIN.TO trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas PIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs PHR.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, PHR.TO has a market cap of 15.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while PHR.TO trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas PHR.TO's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PHR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PHR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs ETP.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, ETP.TO has a market cap of 13.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while ETP.TO trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas ETP.TO's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ETP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to ETP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs ZWQT.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, ZWQT.TO has a market cap of 11.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while ZWQT.TO trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas ZWQT.TO's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZWQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to ZWQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs REIT.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, REIT.TO has a market cap of 9.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while REIT.TO trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas REIT.TO's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to REIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to REIT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs BSO-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, BSO-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while BSO-UN.TO trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas BSO-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSO-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BSO-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs FGX.NE Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, FGX.NE has a market cap of 8.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while FGX.NE trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas FGX.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FGX.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FGX.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs CIQ-UN.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, CIQ-UN.TO has a market cap of 7.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while CIQ-UN.TO trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas CIQ-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CIQ-UN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CIQ-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs TPAY.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, TPAY.TO has a market cap of 7.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while TPAY.TO trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas TPAY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TPAY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to TPAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs FCMI.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, FCMI.TO has a market cap of 6.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while FCMI.TO trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas FCMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FCMI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FCMI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs CES.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, CES.TO has a market cap of 4.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while CES.TO trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas CES.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CES.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CES.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs HID.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, HID.TO has a market cap of 4.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while HID.TO trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas HID.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HID.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HID.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.
ENI-UN.TO vs HBFE.TO Comparison
ENI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENI-UN.TO stands at 4.30M. In comparison, HBFE.TO has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ENI-UN.TO is priced at $1.53, while HBFE.TO trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.30, whereas HBFE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, ENI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HBFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HBFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENI-UN.TO.