BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE ENAM.PA Peers
See (ENAM.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENAM.PA | €23.82 | +0.40% | 176.8M | 26.21 | €0.91 | N/A |
| JPSR.AS | €23.07 | -0.15% | 814.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.07% |
| IWDA.AS | €99.60 | +0.36% | 91.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €99.06 | +0.30% | 54.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.85% |
| VWRL.AS | €127.64 | +0.39% | 32.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.01% |
| SP5H.PA | €299.00 | +0.47% | 18.2B | 26.52 | €11.27 | +1.25% |
| SP5C.PA | €374.42 | +0.27% | 18.2B | 25.80 | €14.51 | N/A |
| IUSA.AS | €51.91 | +0.33% | 15.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.10% |
| ISFA.AS | €10.14 | N/A | 14.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.49% |
| AMUN.PA | €67.45 | +0.82% | 13.7B | 10.59 | €6.37 | +6.30% |
Stock Comparison
ENAM.PA vs JPSR.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, JPSR.AS has a market cap of 814.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while JPSR.AS trades at €23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas JPSR.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to JPSR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while IWDA.AS trades at €99.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs VUSA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while VUSA.AS trades at €99.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs VWRL.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while VWRL.AS trades at €127.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs SP5H.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while SP5H.PA trades at €299.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs SP5C.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while SP5C.PA trades at €374.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs IUSA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while IUSA.AS trades at €51.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ISFA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ISFA.AS trades at €10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs AMUN.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while AMUN.PA trades at €67.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs HAL.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while HAL.AS trades at €121.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs PSH.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs WLDH.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while WLDH.PA trades at €215.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs WLD.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while WLD.PA trades at €339.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs CSH2.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while CSH2.PA trades at €106.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs MEUD.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while MEUD.PA trades at €261.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs IMEU.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while IMEU.AS trades at €34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs GBLB.BR Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while GBLB.BR trades at €72.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 301.25. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs SOF.BR Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while SOF.BR trades at €256.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs I500.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while I500.AS trades at €9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs I50D.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while I50D.AS trades at €6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs GOLD.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while GOLD.PA trades at €116.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs LCWD.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs IWRD.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while IWRD.AS trades at €72.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs CC4.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while CC4.PA trades at €224.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ECRP.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs VHYL.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while VHYL.AS trades at €64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs 500.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while 500.PA trades at €103.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs AEME.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while AEME.PA trades at €69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs CW8.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while CW8.PA trades at €544.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs PHAU.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while PHAU.AS trades at €273.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs IJPA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while IJPA.AS trades at €52.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs UST.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while UST.PA trades at €76.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs VEUR.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while VEUR.AS trades at €43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs S500H.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while S500H.PA trades at €84.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs S500.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while S500.PA trades at €147.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs KBCA.BR Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while KBCA.BR trades at €57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs REINA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while REINA.AS trades at €23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs EUEA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while EUEA.AS trades at €54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs USA.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while USA.PA trades at €487.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs IEMM.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while IEMM.AS trades at €40.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs USAC.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while USAC.PA trades at €528.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs 500X.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while 500X.AS trades at €36.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs RF.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while RF.PA trades at €59.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -69.42. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs C50U.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while C50U.PA trades at €161.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ICHN.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ICHD.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ICHD.AS trades at €4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs CACC.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while CACC.PA trades at €38.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs CAC.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while CAC.PA trades at €77.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA and CAC.PA have similar daily volatility (1.17).
ENAM.PA vs WSRI.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs AUEM.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while AUEM.PA trades at €6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs MSE.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while MSE.PA trades at €59.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA and MSE.PA have similar daily volatility (1.17).
ENAM.PA vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ALLFG.AS trades at €6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -21.54. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs MF.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while MF.PA trades at €85.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -29.16. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs C50.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while C50.PA trades at €139.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs CD5.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while CD5.PA trades at €86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ROLA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ROLA.AS trades at €62.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs BREB.BR Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while BREB.BR trades at €115.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs VERX.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while VERX.AS trades at €43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs AEEM.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while AEEM.PA trades at €5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs TKO.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while TKO.PA trades at €18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs WESE.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while WESE.PA trades at €70.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs CB3.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while CB3.PA trades at €221.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs EEUE.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while EEUE.PA trades at €17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs SEMD.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while SEMD.AS trades at €5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs EHYA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ESE.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ESE.PA trades at €26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while EUSRI.PA trades at €86.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs GEMU.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs EPAB.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while EPAB.PA trades at €35.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs TNOW.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while TNOW.PA trades at €814.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 38.34. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs EXCH.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while EXCH.AS trades at €5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs TDIV.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while TDIV.AS trades at €42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ANX.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ANX.PA trades at €216.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs USRI.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs PABW.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while PABW.PA trades at €76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ANTIN.PA trades at €10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs CMUD.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while CMUD.PA trades at €66.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs BNKE.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while BNKE.PA trades at €244.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs PEUG.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while PEUG.PA trades at €73.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ACWI.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ACWI.PA trades at €470.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs PHAG.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while PHAG.AS trades at €28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs EGOV.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while EGOV.PA trades at €49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs MUSD.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while MUSD.AS trades at €8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs GIMB.BR Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while GIMB.BR trades at €44.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs WAT.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while WAT.PA trades at €67.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs EMPA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while EMPA.AS trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs MPAB.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while MPAB.AS trades at €5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs AASI.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while AASI.PA trades at €39.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs EGRI.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, EGRI.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while EGRI.PA trades at €45.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas EGRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to EGRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs BNK.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while BNK.PA trades at €45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs CG1.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while CG1.PA trades at €420.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs INR.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, INR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while INR.PA trades at €28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas INR.PA's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to INR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs LWCR.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while LWCR.PA trades at €496.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to LWCR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs EXA1.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while EXA1.AS trades at €12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs DAX.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, DAX.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while DAX.PA trades at €216.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas DAX.PA's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to DAX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs WQDA.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while WQDA.AS trades at €9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs TFG.AS Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while TFG.AS trades at €15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is less volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ESGH.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ESGH.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ESGH.PA trades at €25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ESGH.PA's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to ESGH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.
ENAM.PA vs ESGE.PA Comparison
ENAM.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAM.PA stands at 176.8M. In comparison, ESGE.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAM.PA is priced at €23.82, while ESGE.PA trades at €35.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.21, whereas ESGE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, ENAM.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAM.PA is more volatile compared to ESGE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAM.PA.