Enad Global 7 AB (publ)
Enad Global 7 AB (publ) (ENADF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ENADF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENADF | $1.46 | +0.00% | 129.4M | -4.56 | -$0.32 | N/A |
| NTDOF | $85.43 | -1.79% | 101.8B | 53.98 | $1.62 | +0.92% |
| NTDOY | $21.46 | -0.51% | 99.7B | 52.22 | $0.41 | +1.22% |
| NETTF | $25.00 | -10.99% | 79.5B | 17.86 | $1.40 | +2.21% |
| KONMY | $70.75 | +1.45% | 19.2B | 37.83 | $1.87 | +0.49% |
| NEXOF | $18.40 | +0.00% | 14.9B | 18.04 | $1.02 | +1.05% |
| NEXOY | $18.15 | +2.31% | 14.7B | 17.62 | $1.03 | +0.50% |
| CCOEY | $14.30 | -0.83% | 12.1B | 37.17 | $0.39 | +0.87% |
| CCOEF | $28.83 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 36.96 | $0.78 | +0.94% |
| BLBLF | $22.38 | +0.00% | 9.2B | -111.90 | -$0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ENADF vs NTDOF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while NTDOF trades at $85.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 53.98. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check NTDOF's competition here
ENADF vs NTDOY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 99.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while NTDOY trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 52.22. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check NTDOY's competition here
ENADF vs NETTF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while NETTF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check NETTF's competition here
ENADF vs KONMY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while KONMY trades at $70.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check KONMY's competition here
ENADF vs NEXOF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while NEXOF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check NEXOF's competition here
ENADF vs NEXOY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while NEXOY trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check NEXOY's competition here
ENADF vs CCOEY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while CCOEY trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check CCOEY's competition here
ENADF vs CCOEF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while CCOEF trades at $28.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to CCOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check CCOEF's competition here
ENADF vs BLBLF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while BLBLF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is -111.90. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check BLBLF's competition here
ENADF vs SQNXF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SQNXF trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 52.32. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and SQNXF have similar daily volatility (6.36).Check SQNXF's competition here
ENADF vs SQNNY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SQNNY trades at $31.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 46.12. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SQNNY's competition here
ENADF vs KSFTF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while KSFTF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check KSFTF's competition here
ENADF vs OTGLF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while OTGLF trades at $70.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 55.65. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check OTGLF's competition here
ENADF vs OTGLY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while OTGLY trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 54.23. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check OTGLY's competition here
ENADF vs SGAMY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SGAMY trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SGAMY's competition here
ENADF vs BCDMF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check BCDMF's competition here
ENADF vs SGAMF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SGAMF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SGAMF's competition here
ENADF vs KYYWF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check KYYWF's competition here
ENADF vs THQQF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while THQQF trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to THQQF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check THQQF's competition here
ENADF vs DNACF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while DNACF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DNACF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check DNACF's competition here
ENADF vs PRXXF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while PRXXF trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check PRXXF's competition here
ENADF vs KYYWY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check KYYWY's competition here
ENADF vs UBSFF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while UBSFF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check UBSFF's competition here
ENADF vs MIXIF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while MIXIF trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check MIXIF's competition here
ENADF vs UBSFY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while UBSFY trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check UBSFY's competition here
ENADF vs XDNCF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check XDNCF's competition here
ENADF vs GUNGF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while GUNGF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check GUNGF's competition here
ENADF vs GREZF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while GREZF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check GREZF's competition here
ENADF vs RVTTY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check RVTTY's competition here
ENADF vs IGGGF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 616.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while IGGGF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check IGGGF's competition here
ENADF vs BOYAF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 604.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while BOYAF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check BOYAF's competition here
ENADF vs TSVNF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check TSVNF's competition here
ENADF vs STLFF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 282.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while STLFF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check STLFF's competition here
ENADF vs SCFR Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SCFR trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SCFR's competition here
ENADF vs RMDEF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 276.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while RMDEF trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -225.22. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check RMDEF's competition here
ENADF vs AKAFF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check AKAFF's competition here
ENADF vs FRRDF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 159.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while FRRDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check FRRDF's competition here
ENADF vs GENTF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while GENTF trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check GENTF's competition here
ENADF vs PONGF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 87M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while PONGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check PONGF's competition here
ENADF vs POPRF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check POPRF's competition here
ENADF vs EAGRF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while EAGRF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check EAGRF's competition here
ENADF vs VSQTF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while VSQTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check VSQTF's competition here
ENADF vs FGRTF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while FGRTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check FGRTF's competition here
ENADF vs GAMGF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of +15.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check GAMGF's competition here
ENADF vs IDGAF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while IDGAF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check IDGAF's competition here
ENADF vs SMPBF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SMPBF's competition here
ENADF vs SRVTF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SRVTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SRVTF's competition here
ENADF vs SCTGF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SCTGF's competition here
ENADF vs WIGAF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check WIGAF's competition here
ENADF vs ENDRF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while ENDRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check ENDRF's competition here
ENADF vs NVNT Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +62.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check NVNT's competition here
ENADF vs YDRMF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check YDRMF's competition here
ENADF vs BLITF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while BLITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check BLITF's competition here
ENADF vs GGAMF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while GGAMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check GGAMF's competition here
ENADF vs ZUKI Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while ZUKI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check ZUKI's competition here
ENADF vs PRYNF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check PRYNF's competition here
ENADF vs FRZT Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while FRZT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check FRZT's competition here
ENADF vs APETF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while APETF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to APETF's ROE of +4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check APETF's competition here
ENADF vs TAPM Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while TAPM trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check TAPM's competition here
ENADF vs GMETF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 926.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GMETF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check GMETF's competition here
ENADF vs SWMIF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SWMIF's competition here
ENADF vs EPYFF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 720.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check EPYFF's competition here
ENADF vs KSMRF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 684.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check KSMRF's competition here
ENADF vs IMGX Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check IMGX's competition here
ENADF vs WGRFF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 446.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check WGRFF's competition here
ENADF vs ATIG Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 296.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ATIG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check ATIG's competition here
ENADF vs IENT Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 150.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while IENT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check IENT's competition here
ENADF vs TIIDF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check TIIDF's competition here
ENADF vs PLGC Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PLGC's ROE of +19.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check PLGC's competition here
ENADF vs COUV Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 67.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check COUV's competition here
ENADF vs CLIS Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check CLIS's competition here
ENADF vs NTEK Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTEK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check NTEK's competition here
ENADF vs STIE Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 17K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check STIE's competition here
ENADF vs LIVC Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +15.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check LIVC's competition here
ENADF vs WINRW Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WINRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check WINRW's competition here
ENADF vs GMGT Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check GMGT's competition here
ENADF vs ADTR Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check ADTR's competition here
ENADF vs FASDF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 4.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +16.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check FASDF's competition here
ENADF vs VRVR Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check VRVR's competition here
ENADF vs SPYR Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SPYR's competition here
ENADF vs AXNVF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check AXNVF's competition here
ENADF vs YVRLF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check YVRLF's competition here
ENADF vs WINR Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WINR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check WINR's competition here
ENADF vs HTSF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check HTSF's competition here
ENADF vs TERA Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TERA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check TERA's competition here
ENADF vs BLKCF Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to BLKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check BLKCF's competition here
ENADF vs SPLY Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SPLY's competition here
ENADF vs IPUB Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check IPUB's competition here
ENADF vs RIVX Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check RIVX's competition here
ENADF vs GBNW Comparison July 2025
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 129.4M. In comparison, GBNW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.46, while GBNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.56, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to GBNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check GBNW's competition here