Enad Global 7 AB (publ)
Enad Global 7 AB (publ) (ENADF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ENADF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENADF | $1.42 | +21.37% | 125.8M | -6.45 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| NETTF | $24.03 | +2.74% | 74.1B | 15.39 | $1.52 | +2.59% |
| NTDOF | $55.22 | -1.92% | 64.6B | 27.06 | $2.05 | +1.53% |
| NTDOY | $13.75 | -1.86% | 64.1B | 27.00 | $0.51 | +1.01% |
| NEXOF | $25.50 | +0.00% | 20.1B | 31.88 | $0.80 | +1.16% |
| KONMY | $59.95 | -0.96% | 16.6B | 29.82 | $2.05 | +0.91% |
| NEXOY | $20.06 | -2.62% | 15.9B | 26.79 | $0.75 | +1.15% |
| BLBLF | $31.00 | +38.52% | 10.7B | 98.38 | $0.26 | N/A |
| CCOEF | $21.00 | +4.74% | 8.8B | 22.34 | $0.94 | +1.34% |
| CCOEY | $10.02 | -1.28% | 8.4B | 21.36 | $0.47 | +1.41% |
Stock Comparison
ENADF vs NETTF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while NETTF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and NETTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NETTF's competition here
ENADF vs NTDOF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while NTDOF trades at $55.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check NTDOF's competition here
ENADF vs NTDOY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while NTDOY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check NTDOY's competition here
ENADF vs NEXOF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while NEXOF trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and NEXOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEXOF's competition here
ENADF vs KONMY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while KONMY trades at $59.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check KONMY's competition here
ENADF vs NEXOY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while NEXOY trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check NEXOY's competition here
ENADF vs BLBLF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while BLBLF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is 98.38. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and BLBLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLBLF's competition here
ENADF vs CCOEF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while CCOEF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and CCOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCOEF's competition here
ENADF vs CCOEY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while CCOEY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check CCOEY's competition here
ENADF vs OTGLF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while OTGLF trades at $69.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 43.59. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and OTGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTGLF's competition here
ENADF vs OTGLY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while OTGLY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 42.26. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check OTGLY's competition here
ENADF vs SQNNY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SQNNY trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SQNNY's competition here
ENADF vs SQNXF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SQNXF trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and SQNXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SQNXF's competition here
ENADF vs KSFTF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while KSFTF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and KSFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSFTF's competition here
ENADF vs SGAMF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SGAMF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 33.46. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and SGAMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGAMF's competition here
ENADF vs SGAMY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SGAMY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check SGAMY's competition here
ENADF vs KYYWF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and KYYWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KYYWF's competition here
ENADF vs DNACF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while DNACF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to DNACF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and DNACF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNACF's competition here
ENADF vs MIXIF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while MIXIF trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and MIXIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIXIF's competition here
ENADF vs KYYWY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check KYYWY's competition here
ENADF vs PRXXF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while PRXXF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 104.54. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and PRXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRXXF's competition here
ENADF vs XDNCF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check XDNCF's competition here
ENADF vs THQQF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while THQQF trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to THQQF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and THQQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THQQF's competition here
ENADF vs GUNGF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while GUNGF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and GUNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUNGF's competition here
ENADF vs RVTTY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and RVTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RVTTY's competition here
ENADF vs UBSFF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 642.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while UBSFF trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check UBSFF's competition here
ENADF vs UBSFY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 625.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while UBSFY trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check UBSFY's competition here
ENADF vs GREZF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 542.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while GREZF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 79.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and GREZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GREZF's competition here
ENADF vs IGGGF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 488.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while IGGGF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and IGGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGGGF's competition here
ENADF vs BOYAF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while BOYAF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and BOYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOYAF's competition here
ENADF vs SCFR Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 292.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SCFR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and SCFR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCFR's competition here
ENADF vs FRRDF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while FRRDF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and FRRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRRDF's competition here
ENADF vs STLFF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while STLFF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and STLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STLFF's competition here
ENADF vs RMDEF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while RMDEF trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and RMDEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMDEF's competition here
ENADF vs AKAFF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and AKAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKAFF's competition here
ENADF vs GBNW Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, GBNW has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while GBNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and GBNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBNW's competition here
ENADF vs GENTF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while GENTF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and GENTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GENTF's competition here
ENADF vs PONGF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while PONGF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -7.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and PONGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PONGF's competition here
ENADF vs VSQTF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while VSQTF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is 43.54. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check VSQTF's competition here
ENADF vs POPRF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check POPRF's competition here
ENADF vs FGRTF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while FGRTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and FGRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FGRTF's competition here
ENADF vs GAMGF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check GAMGF's competition here
ENADF vs IDGAF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while IDGAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and IDGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDGAF's competition here
ENADF vs EAGRF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while EAGRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and EAGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EAGRF's competition here
ENADF vs SMPBF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and SMPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMPBF's competition here
ENADF vs SCTGF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and SCTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTGF's competition here
ENADF vs ZUKI Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while ZUKI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and ZUKI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZUKI's competition here
ENADF vs WIGAF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and WIGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WIGAF's competition here
ENADF vs NVNT Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +5.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and NVNT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVNT's competition here
ENADF vs YDRMF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and YDRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YDRMF's competition here
ENADF vs APETF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while APETF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to APETF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and APETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APETF's competition here
ENADF vs GGAMF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while GGAMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and GGAMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GGAMF's competition here
ENADF vs SRVTF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SRVTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and SRVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRVTF's competition here
ENADF vs PRYNF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and PRYNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRYNF's competition here
ENADF vs SWMIF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and SWMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWMIF's competition here
ENADF vs BCDMF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 730.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and BCDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCDMF's competition here
ENADF vs IMGX Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and IMGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMGX's competition here
ENADF vs FRZT Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 623K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and FRZT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRZT's competition here
ENADF vs ATIG Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 593K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to ATIG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and ATIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATIG's competition here
ENADF vs GMETF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 570.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to GMETF's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and GMETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMETF's competition here
ENADF vs TAPM Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 408.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while TAPM trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check TAPM's competition here
ENADF vs IENT Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 405.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while IENT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and IENT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IENT's competition here
ENADF vs KSMRF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 235.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and KSMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSMRF's competition here
ENADF vs EPYFF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 234.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and EPYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPYFF's competition here
ENADF vs WGRFF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 229.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and WGRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WGRFF's competition here
ENADF vs TIIDF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and TIIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIIDF's competition here
ENADF vs PLGC Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to PLGC's ROE of +19.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check PLGC's competition here
ENADF vs SPYR Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 70.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and SPYR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPYR's competition here
ENADF vs COUV Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and COUV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COUV's competition here
ENADF vs CLIS Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to CLIS's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check CLIS's competition here
ENADF vs STIE Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 34K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and STIE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STIE's competition here
ENADF vs GMGT Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 27.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and GMGT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMGT's competition here
ENADF vs BLITF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 22.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while BLITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and BLITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLITF's competition here
ENADF vs NTEK Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to NTEK's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and NTEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTEK's competition here
ENADF vs LIVC Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +15.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and LIVC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIVC's competition here
ENADF vs WINRW Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to WINRW's ROE of -53.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and WINRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WINRW's competition here
ENADF vs ADTR Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and ADTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADTR's competition here
ENADF vs ENDRF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while ENDRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check ENDRF's competition here
ENADF vs AXNVF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and AXNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXNVF's competition here
ENADF vs VRVR Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +7.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and VRVR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VRVR's competition here
ENADF vs WINR Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to WINR's ROE of -53.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and WINR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WINR's competition here
ENADF vs HTSF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and HTSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTSF's competition here
ENADF vs TERA Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to TERA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and TERA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TERA's competition here
ENADF vs BLKCF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and BLKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLKCF's competition here
ENADF vs SPLY Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and SPLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPLY's competition here
ENADF vs IPUB Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and IPUB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPUB's competition here
ENADF vs FASDF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 840. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +17.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and FASDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FASDF's competition here
ENADF vs RIVX Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +15.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF and RIVX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIVX's competition here
ENADF vs YVRLF Comparison February 2026
ENADF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENADF stands at 125.8M. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 483. Regarding current trading prices, ENADF is priced at $1.42, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENADF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENADF's ROE is -0.64%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENADF is less volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENADF.Check YVRLF's competition here