eMudhra Limited

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TATAELXSI.BO has a market cap of 285.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while TATAELXSI.BO trades at ₹4,497.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TATAELXSI.BO's P/E ratio is 49.08. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TATAELXSI.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to TATAELXSI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check TATAELXSI.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TATAELXSI.NS has a market cap of 285.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while TATAELXSI.NS trades at ₹4,498.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TATAELXSI.NS's P/E ratio is 49.16. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TATAELXSI.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to TATAELXSI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check TATAELXSI.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KFINTECH.NS has a market cap of 172.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while KFINTECH.NS trades at ₹1,001.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas KFINTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 49.91. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KFINTECH.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to KFINTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check KFINTECH.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KFINTECH.BO has a market cap of 172.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while KFINTECH.BO trades at ₹1,000.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas KFINTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 49.69. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KFINTECH.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to KFINTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check KFINTECH.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, BLACKBUCK.NS has a market cap of 108.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while BLACKBUCK.NS trades at ₹602.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas BLACKBUCK.NS's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLACKBUCK.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to BLACKBUCK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check BLACKBUCK.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, INTELLECT.NS has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while INTELLECT.NS trades at ₹697.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas INTELLECT.NS's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTELLECT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to INTELLECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check INTELLECT.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, INTELLECT.BO has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while INTELLECT.BO trades at ₹698.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas INTELLECT.BO's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTELLECT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to INTELLECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check INTELLECT.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, BBOX.NS has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while BBOX.NS trades at ₹518.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas BBOX.NS's P/E ratio is 43.81. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBOX.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to BBOX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check BBOX.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, BBOX.BO has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while BBOX.BO trades at ₹519.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas BBOX.BO's P/E ratio is 43.57. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBOX.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to BBOX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check BBOX.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, NEWGEN.BO has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while NEWGEN.BO trades at ₹514.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas NEWGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEWGEN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to NEWGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check NEWGEN.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, NEWGEN.NS has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while NEWGEN.NS trades at ₹513.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas NEWGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEWGEN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to NEWGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check NEWGEN.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, RATEGAIN.NS has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while RATEGAIN.NS trades at ₹513.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas RATEGAIN.NS's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RATEGAIN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to RATEGAIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check RATEGAIN.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, RATEGAIN.BO has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while RATEGAIN.BO trades at ₹511.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas RATEGAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RATEGAIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to RATEGAIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check RATEGAIN.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TANLA.BO has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while TANLA.BO trades at ₹446.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TANLA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TANLA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to TANLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check TANLA.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TANLA.NS has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while TANLA.NS trades at ₹446.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TANLA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TANLA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to TANLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check TANLA.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MAPMYINDIA.BO has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while MAPMYINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,074.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas MAPMYINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 43.54. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAPMYINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to MAPMYINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check MAPMYINDIA.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MAPMYINDIA.NS has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while MAPMYINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,075.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas MAPMYINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 43.51. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAPMYINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to MAPMYINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check MAPMYINDIA.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, EMUDHRA.NS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while EMUDHRA.NS trades at ₹443.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas EMUDHRA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMUDHRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to EMUDHRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check EMUDHRA.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, NPST.NS has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while NPST.NS trades at ₹1,130.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas NPST.NS's P/E ratio is 64.21. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPST.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to NPST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check NPST.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, NUCLEUS.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while NUCLEUS.BO trades at ₹791.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas NUCLEUS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NUCLEUS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to NUCLEUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check NUCLEUS.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, NUCLEUS.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while NUCLEUS.NS trades at ₹793.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas NUCLEUS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NUCLEUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to NUCLEUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check NUCLEUS.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, INFOBEAN.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while INFOBEAN.BO trades at ₹829.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas INFOBEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INFOBEAN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to INFOBEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check INFOBEAN.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, INFOBEAN.NS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while INFOBEAN.NS trades at ₹828.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas INFOBEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INFOBEAN.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to INFOBEAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check INFOBEAN.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KERNEX.BO has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while KERNEX.BO trades at ₹1,103.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas KERNEX.BO's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KERNEX.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to KERNEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check KERNEX.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KERNEX.NS has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while KERNEX.NS trades at ₹1,103.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas KERNEX.NS's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KERNEX.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to KERNEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check KERNEX.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, RAMCOSYS.NS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while RAMCOSYS.NS trades at ₹463.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas RAMCOSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 76.76. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAMCOSYS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to RAMCOSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check RAMCOSYS.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, RAMCOSYS.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while RAMCOSYS.BO trades at ₹462.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas RAMCOSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 75.90. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAMCOSYS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to RAMCOSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check RAMCOSYS.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MEGASOFT.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while MEGASOFT.NS trades at ₹188.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas MEGASOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEGASOFT.NS's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to MEGASOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check MEGASOFT.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, GENESYS.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while GENESYS.NS trades at ₹306.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas GENESYS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GENESYS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to GENESYS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check GENESYS.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, GENESYS.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while GENESYS.BO trades at ₹307.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas GENESYS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GENESYS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to GENESYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check GENESYS.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, UNIECOM.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while UNIECOM.NS trades at ₹107.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas UNIECOM.NS's P/E ratio is 59.19. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNIECOM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to UNIECOM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check UNIECOM.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, IZMO.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while IZMO.NS trades at ₹806.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas IZMO.NS's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IZMO.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to IZMO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check IZMO.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, IZMO.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while IZMO.BO trades at ₹807.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas IZMO.BO's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IZMO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to IZMO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check IZMO.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KELLTONTEC.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while KELLTONTEC.BO trades at ₹19.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas KELLTONTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KELLTONTEC.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to KELLTONTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check KELLTONTEC.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KELLTONTEC.NS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while KELLTONTEC.NS trades at ₹19.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas KELLTONTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KELLTONTEC.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to KELLTONTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check KELLTONTEC.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, QUICKHEAL.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while QUICKHEAL.BO trades at ₹174.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas QUICKHEAL.BO's P/E ratio is 163.16. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QUICKHEAL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to QUICKHEAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check QUICKHEAL.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, QUICKHEAL.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while QUICKHEAL.NS trades at ₹174.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas QUICKHEAL.NS's P/E ratio is 162.89. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to QUICKHEAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check QUICKHEAL.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, INNOVANA.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while INNOVANA.NS trades at ₹423.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas INNOVANA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INNOVANA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to INNOVANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check INNOVANA.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KSOLVES.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while KSOLVES.NS trades at ₹304.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas KSOLVES.NS's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KSOLVES.NS's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to KSOLVES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check KSOLVES.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KSOLVES.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while KSOLVES.BO trades at ₹303.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas KSOLVES.BO's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KSOLVES.BO's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to KSOLVES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check KSOLVES.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VEEFIN.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while VEEFIN.BO trades at ₹259.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas VEEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VEEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to VEEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check VEEFIN.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SUBEXLTD.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while SUBEXLTD.NS trades at ₹9.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SUBEXLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 469.50. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUBEXLTD.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to SUBEXLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check SUBEXLTD.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, IRIS.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while IRIS.NS trades at ₹250.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas IRIS.NS's P/E ratio is 59.75. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IRIS.NS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to IRIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check IRIS.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ABMKNO.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while ABMKNO.BO trades at ₹249.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas ABMKNO.BO's P/E ratio is 41.94. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABMKNO.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to ABMKNO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check ABMKNO.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SOFTTECH.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while SOFTTECH.NS trades at ₹284.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SOFTTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 295.84. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOFTTECH.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to SOFTTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check SOFTTECH.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SOFTTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while SOFTTECH.BO trades at ₹280.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SOFTTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 295.00. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOFTTECH.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to SOFTTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check SOFTTECH.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, XTGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while XTGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas XTGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XTGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to XTGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check XTGLOBAL.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TRACXN.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while TRACXN.BO trades at ₹32.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TRACXN.BO's P/E ratio is -26.76. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRACXN.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to TRACXN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check TRACXN.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TRACXN.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while TRACXN.NS trades at ₹32.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TRACXN.NS's P/E ratio is -26.76. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRACXN.NS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to TRACXN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check TRACXN.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TREJHARA.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while TREJHARA.BO trades at ₹198.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TREJHARA.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TREJHARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to TREJHARA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check TREJHARA.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TREJHARA.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while TREJHARA.NS trades at ₹196.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TREJHARA.NS's P/E ratio is 73.78. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TREJHARA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to TREJHARA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check TREJHARA.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, DANLAW.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while DANLAW.BO trades at ₹598.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas DANLAW.BO's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DANLAW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to DANLAW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check DANLAW.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AVANCE.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while AVANCE.BO trades at ₹1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas AVANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 114.00. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AVANCE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to AVANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check AVANCE.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VIAANINDUS.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while VIAANINDUS.BO trades at ₹1,940.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas VIAANINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is -250.65. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIAANINDUS.BO's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to VIAANINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check VIAANINDUS.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VIRINCHI.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while VIRINCHI.BO trades at ₹19.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas VIRINCHI.BO's P/E ratio is -12.12. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIRINCHI.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to VIRINCHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check VIRINCHI.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VIRINCHI.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while VIRINCHI.NS trades at ₹19.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas VIRINCHI.NS's P/E ratio is -12.03. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIRINCHI.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to VIRINCHI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check VIRINCHI.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, 7SEASL.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while 7SEASL.BO trades at ₹73.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas 7SEASL.BO's P/E ratio is 81.85. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7SEASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to 7SEASL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check 7SEASL.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CNIRESLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while CNIRESLTD.BO trades at ₹10.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas CNIRESLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -23.89. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNIRESLTD.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to CNIRESLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check CNIRESLTD.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CURAA.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while CURAA.NS trades at ₹89.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas CURAA.NS's P/E ratio is -386.96. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURAA.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to CURAA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check CURAA.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ORCHASP.NS has a market cap of 840.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while ORCHASP.NS trades at ₹2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas ORCHASP.NS's P/E ratio is -65.75. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORCHASP.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to ORCHASP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check ORCHASP.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CALSOFT.NS has a market cap of 820.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while CALSOFT.NS trades at ₹13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas CALSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 134.10. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CALSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to CALSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check CALSOFT.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CALSOFT.BO has a market cap of 818.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while CALSOFT.BO trades at ₹13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas CALSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 133.80. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CALSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to CALSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check CALSOFT.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ODYSSEY.BO has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while ODYSSEY.BO trades at ₹51.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas ODYSSEY.BO's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ODYSSEY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to ODYSSEY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check ODYSSEY.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AMRAPLIN.BO has a market cap of 742.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while AMRAPLIN.BO trades at ₹14.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas AMRAPLIN.BO's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMRAPLIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to AMRAPLIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check AMRAPLIN.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SECURKLOUD.NS has a market cap of 723M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while SECURKLOUD.NS trades at ₹21.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SECURKLOUD.NS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SECURKLOUD.NS's ROE of -8.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to SECURKLOUD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check SECURKLOUD.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SECURKLOUD.BO has a market cap of 715M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while SECURKLOUD.BO trades at ₹22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SECURKLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SECURKLOUD.BO's ROE of -8.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to SECURKLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check SECURKLOUD.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SGLRES.BO has a market cap of 696.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while SGLRES.BO trades at ₹2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SGLRES.BO's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGLRES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to SGLRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check SGLRES.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VIRTUALS.BO has a market cap of 691.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while VIRTUALS.BO trades at ₹20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas VIRTUALS.BO's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIRTUALS.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to VIRTUALS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check VIRTUALS.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CRANESSOFT.BO has a market cap of 671.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while CRANESSOFT.BO trades at ₹4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas CRANESSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to CRANESSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check CRANESSOFT.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SOFCOM.BO has a market cap of 666.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while SOFCOM.BO trades at ₹29.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SOFCOM.BO's P/E ratio is 41.07. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOFCOM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to SOFCOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check SOFCOM.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AEONXDIGI.BO has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while AEONXDIGI.BO trades at ₹130.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas AEONXDIGI.BO's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEONXDIGI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to AEONXDIGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check AEONXDIGI.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SAGARSOFT.BO has a market cap of 556.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while SAGARSOFT.BO trades at ₹89.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SAGARSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 241.67. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAGARSOFT.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to SAGARSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check SAGARSOFT.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TELECANOR.BO has a market cap of 508.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while TELECANOR.BO trades at ₹42.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TELECANOR.BO's P/E ratio is -130.82. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TELECANOR.BO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to TELECANOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check TELECANOR.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, NETLINK.BO has a market cap of 468.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while NETLINK.BO trades at ₹187.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas NETLINK.BO's P/E ratio is 463.00. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NETLINK.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to NETLINK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check NETLINK.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, RAMINFO.BO has a market cap of 440M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while RAMINFO.BO trades at ₹54.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas RAMINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAMINFO.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to RAMINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check RAMINFO.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, JUPITERIN.BO has a market cap of 438.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while JUPITERIN.BO trades at ₹42.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas JUPITERIN.BO's P/E ratio is -24.58. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JUPITERIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to JUPITERIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check JUPITERIN.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SAWABUSI.BO has a market cap of 377.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while SAWABUSI.BO trades at ₹0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SAWABUSI.BO's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAWABUSI.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to SAWABUSI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check SAWABUSI.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, WESTLEIRES.BO has a market cap of 319.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while WESTLEIRES.BO trades at ₹109.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas WESTLEIRES.BO's P/E ratio is -307.65. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WESTLEIRES.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to WESTLEIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check WESTLEIRES.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TELESYS.BO has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while TELESYS.BO trades at ₹13.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TELESYS.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TELESYS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to TELESYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check TELESYS.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KASHYAP.BO has a market cap of 253.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while KASHYAP.BO trades at ₹5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas KASHYAP.BO's P/E ratio is -133.00. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KASHYAP.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to KASHYAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check KASHYAP.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ERPSOFT.BO has a market cap of 234M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while ERPSOFT.BO trades at ₹62.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas ERPSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 65.67. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ERPSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to ERPSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check ERPSOFT.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AHASOLAR.BO has a market cap of 228.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while AHASOLAR.BO trades at ₹74.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas AHASOLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHASOLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to AHASOLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check AHASOLAR.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CONTCHM.BO has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while CONTCHM.BO trades at ₹74.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas CONTCHM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CONTCHM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to CONTCHM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check CONTCHM.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, COSYN.BO has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while COSYN.BO trades at ₹22.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas COSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 93.48. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COSYN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to COSYN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check COSYN.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, OTCO.BO has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while OTCO.BO trades at ₹8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas OTCO.BO's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OTCO.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to OTCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check OTCO.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, IFINSER.BO has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while IFINSER.BO trades at ₹15.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas IFINSER.BO's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IFINSER.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to IFINSER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check IFINSER.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MELSTAR.NS has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while MELSTAR.NS trades at ₹4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas MELSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MELSTAR.NS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to MELSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check MELSTAR.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MAHAVEER.BO has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while MAHAVEER.BO trades at ₹9.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas MAHAVEER.BO's P/E ratio is -95.56. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAHAVEER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to MAHAVEER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check MAHAVEER.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, BGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while BGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas BGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGLOBAL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to BGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check BGLOBAL.NS's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VIRGOGLOB.BO has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while VIRGOGLOB.BO trades at ₹3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas VIRGOGLOB.BO's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIRGOGLOB.BO's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to VIRGOGLOB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check VIRGOGLOB.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, INTEGHIT.BO has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while INTEGHIT.BO trades at ₹3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas INTEGHIT.BO's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTEGHIT.BO's ROE of -6.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to INTEGHIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check INTEGHIT.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MELSTAR.BO has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while MELSTAR.BO trades at ₹4.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas MELSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MELSTAR.BO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is less volatile compared to MELSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check MELSTAR.BO's competition here

EMUDHRA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMUDHRA.BO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AGCNET.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMUDHRA.BO is priced at ₹443.60, while AGCNET.NS trades at ₹906.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMUDHRA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas AGCNET.NS's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, EMUDHRA.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGCNET.NS's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EMUDHRA.BO is more volatile compared to AGCNET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMUDHRA.BO.Check AGCNET.NS's competition here