Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 (EMP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EMP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMP | $20.70 | -0.16% | 179.3M | 1.56 | $13.24 | +4.45% |
| NEE | $71.34 | -0.71% | 146.9B | 24.85 | $2.87 | +3.03% |
| SOJD | $20.48 | +0.10% | 105B | N/A | N/A | +3.08% |
| SOJC | $22.12 | +0.09% | 104.9B | 26.33 | $0.84 | +3.08% |
| SOJE | $17.85 | -0.31% | 104.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.08% |
| SO | $94.30 | -1.10% | 103.7B | 22.62 | $4.17 | +3.08% |
| DUK-PA | $24.73 | +0.06% | 93.5B | 5.20 | $4.76 | +3.55% |
| DUKB | $23.88 | -0.13% | 93.1B | N/A | N/A | +3.55% |
| DUK | $117.60 | -1.95% | 91.4B | 19.51 | $6.03 | +3.55% |
| NEE-PR | $41.24 | -0.53% | 84.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.03% |
Stock Comparison
EMP vs NEE Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while NEE trades at $71.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check NEE's competition here
EMP vs SOJD Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 105B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while SOJD trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check SOJD's competition here
EMP vs SOJC Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while SOJC trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check SOJC's competition here
EMP vs SOJE Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while SOJE trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check SOJE's competition here
EMP vs SO Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 103.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while SO trades at $94.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check SO's competition here
EMP vs DUK-PA Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DUK-PA trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DUK-PA's competition here
EMP vs DUKB Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DUKB trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DUKB's competition here
EMP vs DUK Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DUK trades at $117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DUK's competition here
EMP vs NEE-PR Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while NEE-PR trades at $41.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check NEE-PR's competition here
EMP vs NGG Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while NGG trades at $70.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check NGG's competition here
EMP vs AEP Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while AEP trades at $107.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check AEP's competition here
EMP vs SREA Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while SREA trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check SREA's competition here
EMP vs D Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, D has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while D trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas D's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to D's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check D's competition here
EMP vs NEE-PN Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while NEE-PN trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check NEE-PN's competition here
EMP vs EXC Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while EXC trades at $43.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check EXC's competition here
EMP vs PEG Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PEG trades at $86.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PEG's competition here
EMP vs EXCVV Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check EXCVV's competition here
EMP vs XEL Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while XEL trades at $71.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check XEL's competition here
EMP vs ELC Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while ELC trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check ELC's competition here
EMP vs ETR Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while ETR trades at $86.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check ETR's competition here
EMP vs ED Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while ED trades at $100.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check ED's competition here
EMP vs WEC Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while WEC trades at $107.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check WEC's competition here
EMP vs PCG Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PCG trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PCG's competition here
EMP vs DTG Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DTG trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DTG's competition here
EMP vs DTW Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DTW trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DTW's competition here
EMP vs DTB Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DTB trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DTB's competition here
EMP vs DTE Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DTE trades at $137.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DTE's competition here
EMP vs AEE Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while AEE trades at $98.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check AEE's competition here
EMP vs PPL Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PPL trades at $35.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PPL's competition here
EMP vs FTS Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while FTS trades at $48.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check FTS's competition here
EMP vs ES Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while ES trades at $65.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check ES's competition here
EMP vs FE Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while FE trades at $41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check FE's competition here
EMP vs DTY Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DTY's competition here
EMP vs CMSA Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while CMSA trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check CMSA's competition here
EMP vs CMSD Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while CMSD trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check CMSD's competition here
EMP vs CMSC Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while CMSC trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check CMSC's competition here
EMP vs CMS Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while CMS trades at $71.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check CMS's competition here
EMP vs EIX Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while EIX trades at $52.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check EIX's competition here
EMP vs AQNB Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while AQNB trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check AQNB's competition here
EMP vs KEP Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while KEP trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check KEP's competition here
EMP vs LNT Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while LNT trades at $63.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check LNT's competition here
EMP vs EBR-B Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while EBR-B trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check EBR-B's competition here
EMP vs EVRG Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while EVRG trades at $68.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check EVRG's competition here
EMP vs EBR Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while EBR trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check EBR's competition here
EMP vs AGR Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check AGR's competition here
EMP vs OKLO Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while OKLO trades at $75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -160.70. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check OKLO's competition here
EMP vs PNW Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PNW trades at $88.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PNW's competition here
EMP vs OGE Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while OGE trades at $44.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check OGE's competition here
EMP vs IDA Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while IDA trades at $120.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check IDA's competition here
EMP vs CMS-PB Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while CMS-PB trades at $76.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check CMS-PB's competition here
EMP vs TXNM Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while TXNM trades at $56.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check TXNM's competition here
EMP vs PCG-PA Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PCG-PA trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PCG-PA's competition here
EMP vs CMS-PC Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while CMS-PC trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check CMS-PC's competition here
EMP vs PCG-PB Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PCG-PB trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PCG-PB's competition here
EMP vs PCG-PC Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PCG-PC trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PCG-PC's competition here
EMP vs PCG-PE Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PCG-PE trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PCG-PE's competition here
EMP vs PCG-PD Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PCG-PD trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PCG-PD's competition here
EMP vs DTJ Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DTJ's competition here
EMP vs POR Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while POR trades at $40.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check POR's competition here
EMP vs PCG-PG Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PCG-PG trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PCG-PG's competition here
EMP vs ENIC Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while ENIC trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check ENIC's competition here
EMP vs PNM Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PNM's competition here
EMP vs CEPU Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while CEPU trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 43.57. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check CEPU's competition here
EMP vs EDN Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while EDN trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check EDN's competition here
EMP vs ETI-P Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while ETI-P trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check ETI-P's competition here
EMP vs EAI Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 966.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while EAI trades at $20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check EAI's competition here
EMP vs GNE Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 540.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while GNE trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check GNE's competition here
EMP vs SPKE Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check SPKE's competition here
EMP vs SPKEP Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check SPKEP's competition here
EMP vs GNE-PA Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check GNE-PA's competition here
EMP vs GPJA Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 200.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while GPJA trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check GPJA's competition here
EMP vs ENO Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 184.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while ENO trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check ENO's competition here
EMP vs ENJ Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while ENJ trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check ENJ's competition here
EMP vs VIASP Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while VIASP trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check VIASP's competition here
EMP vs VIA Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while VIA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check VIA's competition here
EMP vs IPLDP Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check IPLDP's competition here
EMP vs PCGU Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while PCGU trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check PCGU's competition here
EMP vs ALP-PQ Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check ALP-PQ's competition here
EMP vs AEPPZ Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check AEPPZ's competition here
EMP vs CNP-PB Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, CNP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check CNP-PB's competition here
EMP vs NEE-PP Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check NEE-PP's competition here
EMP vs DTP Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DTP trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DTP's competition here
EMP vs NEE-PQ Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check NEE-PQ's competition here
EMP vs DCUE Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while DCUE trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check DCUE's competition here
EMP vs ENIA Comparison July 2025
EMP plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMP stands at 179.3M. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMP is priced at $20.70, while ENIA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, EMP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMP is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMP.Check ENIA's competition here