iShares V PLC - iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF
iShares V PLC - iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF (EMCA.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EMCA.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMCA.L | £6.48 | +0.02% | 2.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CE31.L | £10,027.50 | +0.79% | 192.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MTXX.L | £4,300.25 | +0.81% | 156.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CE01.L | £13,263.50 | +0.86% | 79B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IB01.L | £116.80 | +0.03% | 23.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IBTU.L | £5.01 | +0.02% | 23.6B | N/A | N/A | +6.54% |
| EHYB.L | £3,450.50 | +0.49% | 21.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.08% |
| AT1D.L | £1,447.90 | -0.43% | 15.8B | N/A | N/A | +6.21% |
| IEAH.L | £5.06 | +0.03% | 14.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.28% |
| 0GGH.L | £4.89 | +0.34% | 13.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EMCA.L vs CE31.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CE31.L has a market cap of 192.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while CE31.L trades at £10,027.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE31.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE31.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to CE31.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check CE31.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs MTXX.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MTXX.L has a market cap of 156.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while MTXX.L trades at £4,300.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to MTXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check MTXX.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs CE01.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CE01.L has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while CE01.L trades at £13,263.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to CE01.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check CE01.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IB01.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IB01.L has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IB01.L trades at £116.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IB01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IB01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to IB01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IB01.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IBTU.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IBTU.L has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IBTU.L trades at £5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to IBTU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IBTU.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs EHYB.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EHYB.L has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while EHYB.L trades at £3,450.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to EHYB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check EHYB.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs AT1D.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AT1D.L has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while AT1D.L trades at £1,447.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1D.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to AT1D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check AT1D.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IEAH.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IEAH.L has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IEAH.L trades at £5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEAH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEAH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to IEAH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IEAH.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs 0GGH.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, 0GGH.L has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while 0GGH.L trades at £4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GGH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GGH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to 0GGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check 0GGH.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IBTA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IBTA.L has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IBTA.L trades at £5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to IBTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IBTA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IBTG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IBTG.L has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IBTG.L trades at £4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IBTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IBTG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IDBT.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IDBT.L has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IDBT.L trades at £129.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDBT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to IDBT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IDBT.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs AGGG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGGG.L has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while AGGG.L trades at £4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to AGGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check AGGG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs UB82.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UB82.L has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while UB82.L trades at £2,878.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB82.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB82.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to UB82.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check UB82.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs GBP5.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GBP5.L has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while GBP5.L trades at £961.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBP5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBP5.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to GBP5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check GBP5.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IBTS.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IBTS.L has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IBTS.L trades at £97.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IBTS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IBTS.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs CBU7.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CBU7.L has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while CBU7.L trades at £140.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBU7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBU7.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to CBU7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check CBU7.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs LQDA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LQDA.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while LQDA.L trades at £6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to LQDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check LQDA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IGBE.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IGBE.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IGBE.L trades at £3,318.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGBE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IGBE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IGBE.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs LQGH.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LQGH.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while LQGH.L trades at £4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQGH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQGH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to LQGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check LQGH.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs LQEE.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LQEE.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while LQEE.L trades at £3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQEE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQEE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to LQEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check LQEE.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs LQDE.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LQDE.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while LQDE.L trades at £102.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to LQDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check LQDE.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs HYGU.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HYGU.L has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while HYGU.L trades at £7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYGU.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to HYGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check HYGU.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IEML.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IEML.L has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IEML.L trades at £45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEML.L's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEML.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IEML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IEML.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SDIG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SDIG.L has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SDIG.L trades at £100.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to SDIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SDIG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SDIA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SDIA.L has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SDIA.L trades at £6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to SDIA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SDIA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IDTM.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IDTM.L has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IDTM.L trades at £174.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IDTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IDTM.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IGTM.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IGTM.L has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IGTM.L trades at £4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IGTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IGTM.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SHYG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHYG.L has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SHYG.L trades at £82.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHYG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHYG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to SHYG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SHYG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IEMB.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IEMB.L has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IEMB.L trades at £90.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IEMB.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs GILI.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GILI.L has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while GILI.L trades at £13,285.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to GILI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check GILI.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs CU71.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CU71.L has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while CU71.L trades at £10,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU71.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU71.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to CU71.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check CU71.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs LQDS.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LQDS.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while LQDS.L trades at £7,746.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to LQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check LQDS.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs GLBL.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GLBL.L has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while GLBL.L trades at £19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBL.L's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLBL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to GLBL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check GLBL.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IDTL.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IDTL.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IDTL.L trades at £3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IDTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IDTL.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs DTLA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DTLA.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while DTLA.L trades at £4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to DTLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check DTLA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IHYU.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IHYU.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IHYU.L trades at £95.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYU.L's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IHYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IHYU.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IHYA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IHYA.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IHYA.L trades at £7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYA.L's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to IHYA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IHYA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IHHG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IHHG.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IHHG.L trades at £4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHHG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHHG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IHHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IHHG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IUAG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IUAG.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IUAG.L trades at £94.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IUAG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IUAG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IUAA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IUAA.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IUAA.L trades at £5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IUAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IUAA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SUOE.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUOE.L has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SUOE.L trades at £4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to SUOE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SUOE.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SUOG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUOG.L has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SUOG.L trades at £4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to SUOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SUOG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IBTM.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IBTM.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IBTM.L trades at £131.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IBTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IBTM.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SEGA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SEGA.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SEGA.L trades at £96.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEGA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to SEGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SEGA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SEMB.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SEMB.L has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SEMB.L trades at £6,810.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to SEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SEMB.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IE15.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IE15.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IE15.L trades at £107.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to IE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IE15.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs FLOA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FLOA.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while FLOA.L trades at £6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLOA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to FLOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check FLOA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VDCP.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VDCP.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VDCP.L trades at £47.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VDCP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VDCP.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VDPA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VDPA.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VDPA.L trades at £59.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VDPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VDPA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs GLAU.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GLAU.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while GLAU.L trades at £30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to GLAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check GLAU.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VECA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VECA.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VECA.L trades at £45.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to VECA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VECA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs GLAG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GLAG.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while GLAG.L trades at £26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to GLAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check GLAG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs GLAD.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GLAD.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while GLAD.L trades at £31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to GLAD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check GLAD.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VECP.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VECP.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VECP.L trades at £42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VECP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VECP.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs EMGA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EMGA.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while EMGA.L trades at £5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMGA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to EMGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check EMGA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IBTL.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IBTL.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IBTL.L trades at £245.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IBTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IBTL.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SUAG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUAG.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SUAG.L trades at £70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to SUAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SUAG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs CORP.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CORP.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while CORP.L trades at £91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to CORP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check CORP.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs CRHG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CRHG.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while CRHG.L trades at £4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRHG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRHG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to CRHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check CRHG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs CRPA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CRPA.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while CRPA.L trades at £5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to CRPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check CRPA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SE15.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SE15.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SE15.L trades at £93.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to SE15.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SE15.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs XBLC.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XBLC.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while XBLC.L trades at £161.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBLC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBLC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to XBLC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check XBLC.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VAGP.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VAGP.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VAGP.L trades at £22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VAGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VAGP.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VAGS.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VAGS.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VAGS.L trades at £25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VAGS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VAGS.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs XT0D.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XT0D.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while XT0D.L trades at £61.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to XT0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check XT0D.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs BBIL.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BBIL.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while BBIL.L trades at £116.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to BBIL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check BBIL.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs AEGG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AEGG.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while AEGG.L trades at £4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L and AEGG.L have similar daily volatility (0.62).Check AEGG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs ERNE.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ERNE.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while ERNE.L trades at £101.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to ERNE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check ERNE.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs GOVG.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GOVG.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while GOVG.L trades at £4,444.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to GOVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check GOVG.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs FLO5.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FLO5.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while FLO5.L trades at £382.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLO5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLO5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to FLO5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check FLO5.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VETA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VETA.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VETA.L trades at £20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VETA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VETA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SEML.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SEML.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SEML.L trades at £33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEML.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEML.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to SEML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SEML.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VETY.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VETY.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VETY.L trades at £19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VETY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VETY.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VCPA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VCPA.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VCPA.L trades at £44.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to VCPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VCPA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VGPA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VGPA.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VGPA.L trades at £48.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGPA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VGPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VGPA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs CRPS.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CRPS.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while CRPS.L trades at £68.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to CRPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check CRPS.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs EMSA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EMSA.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while EMSA.L trades at £5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to EMSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check EMSA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs EMES.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EMES.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while EMES.L trades at £4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMES.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to EMES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check EMES.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs ERN1.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ERN1.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while ERN1.L trades at £88.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERN1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERN1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to ERN1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check ERN1.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs XGLE.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XGLE.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while XGLE.L trades at £221.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGLE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGLE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to XGLE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check XGLE.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IGLA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IGLA.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IGLA.L trades at £4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IGLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IGLA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IGLH.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IGLH.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IGLH.L trades at £4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLH.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IGLH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IGLH.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs IGLO.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IGLO.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while IGLO.L trades at £90.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to IGLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check IGLO.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs XT01.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XT01.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while XT01.L trades at £46.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to XT01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check XT01.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VDTA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VDTA.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VDTA.L trades at £26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VDTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VDTA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VDTY.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VDTY.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VDTY.L trades at £21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VDTY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VDTY.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VDCA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VDCA.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VDCA.L trades at £59.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VDCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VDCA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VDUC.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VDUC.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VDUC.L trades at £49.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDUC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDUC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to VDUC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VDUC.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs XGGB.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XGGB.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while XGGB.L trades at £252.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to XGGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check XGGB.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs XGSI.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XGSI.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while XGSI.L trades at £13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to XGSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check XGSI.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs EMCR.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EMCR.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while EMCR.L trades at £90.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMCR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to EMCR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check EMCR.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs HYLD.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HYLD.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while HYLD.L trades at £91.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLD.L's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to HYLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check HYLD.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs HYLA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HYLA.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while HYLA.L trades at £6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLA.L's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to HYLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check HYLA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs ERND.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ERND.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while ERND.L trades at £100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to ERND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check ERND.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs ERNA.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ERNA.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while ERNA.L trades at £6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is more volatile compared to ERNA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check ERNA.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs SGLO.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SGLO.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while SGLO.L trades at £68.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to SGLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check SGLO.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VDTS.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VDTS.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VDTS.L trades at £21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VDTS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VDTS.L's competition here
EMCA.L vs VUTY.L Comparison August 2025
EMCA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMCA.L stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VUTY.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMCA.L is priced at £6.48, while VUTY.L trades at £16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMCA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUTY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMCA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUTY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMCA.L is less volatile compared to VUTY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMCA.L.Check VUTY.L's competition here