Arca Continental, S.A.B. de C.V.
Arca Continental, S.A.B. de C.V. EMBVF Peers
See (EMBVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMBVF | $10.39 | -0.24% | 18B | 15.18 | $0.70 | +2.92% |
| NNFSF | $5.03 | +0.00% | 54.4B | 32.27 | $0.15 | +4.33% |
| CCHGY | $54.40 | +1.28% | 19.6B | 20.47 | $2.64 | +2.08% |
| CCHBF | $52.65 | -1.20% | 13.3B | 13.77 | $2.65 | +6.19% |
| BTVCY | $29.51 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 23.99 | $1.23 | +2.03% |
| YKLTF | $17.79 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 18.04 | $1.05 | +1.19% |
| YKLTY | $8.84 | +0.23% | 5.3B | 16.73 | $0.51 | +1.52% |
| COCSF | $9.18 | -2.24% | 4.6B | 15.04 | $0.61 | +3.60% |
| BTVCF | $16.40 | +15.09% | 4.1B | 26.89 | $0.61 | +2.26% |
| UNPSF | $0.89 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 14.77 | $0.06 | +6.71% |
Stock Comparison
EMBVF vs NNFSF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while NNFSF trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to NNFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs CCHGY Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while CCHGY trades at $54.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs CCHBF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while CCHBF trades at $52.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs BTVCY Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to BTVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs YKLTF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while YKLTF trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs YKLTY Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while YKLTY trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs COCSF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while COCSF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs BTVCF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs UNPSF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to UNPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs ITONF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while ITONF trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs CCOJY Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while CCOJY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 101.43. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs CCOJF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 69.05. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to CCOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs ITOEF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to ITOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs OSOPF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to OSOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs FQVTF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while FQVTF trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 42.86. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs LSDAF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while LSDAF trades at $157.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs YNAJF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 807.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while YNAJF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs BAGFF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 778.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to BAGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs NJMVF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 698M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to NJMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs HAATF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while HAATF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs UPCHY Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while UPCHY trades at $116.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs CHFHY Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs PDPG Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while PDPG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to PDPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs JSDA Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while JSDA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs MOJO Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while MOJO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs HIRU Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while HIRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs KRTL Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while KRTL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs RVBR Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while RVBR trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs FLWBF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while FLWBF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs APRU Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while APRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs DRNK Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while DRNK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs PLVFF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to PLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs RMHB Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while RMHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs PURT Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while PURT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs AQPW Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while AQPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs INKW Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while INKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs ALKM Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 864.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while ALKM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to ALKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs NBVG Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 768.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while NBVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBVG's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs FBEC Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 585.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while FBEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to FBEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs HSEEF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 414.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while HSEEF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of +5.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs MCHA Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 409.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while MCHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCHA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to MCHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs TBEV Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 397.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while TBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to TBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs VGID Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while VGID trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to VGID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs NTEI Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 272K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while NTEI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to NTEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs ASII Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 265.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while ASII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs FMBV Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 226.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while FMBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FMBV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs STZU Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 206.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while STZU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs FHBC Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while FHBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to FHBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs HFBG Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 197K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while HFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs DNAX Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while DNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to DNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs GHMP Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while GHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GHMP's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to GHMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs DNDT Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 142K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while DNDT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs MLHC Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while MLHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs EQLB Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 71.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while EQLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs KRED Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 22.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while KRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to KRED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs FGFT Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while FGFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to FGFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs BGEM Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 15.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while BGEM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs BVNNF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +6.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to BVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs PPBV Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while PPBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPBV's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs HKBV Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while HKBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HKBV's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs KGKG Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while KGKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs SWRI Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while SWRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to SWRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs AQUI Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 594. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while AQUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AQUI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs BBDA Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while BBDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBDA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to BBDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs ABVG Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while ABVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to ABVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs CLCL Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, CLCL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while CLCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs GGGRF Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, GGGRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is more volatile compared to GGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.
EMBVF vs RMIL Comparison
EMBVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMBVF stands at 18B. In comparison, RMIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMBVF is priced at $10.39, while RMIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMBVF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, EMBVF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMBVF is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMBVF.