VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets Aggregate Bond ETF

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VBTIX has a market cap of 359.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VBTIX trades at $9.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VBTIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VBTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VBTIX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VBTLX has a market cap of 359.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VBTLX trades at $9.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBTLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VBTLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VBTLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VBTLX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VBMFX has a market cap of 359.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VBMFX trades at $9.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBMFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VBMFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VBMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VBMFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BND has a market cap of 359.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BND trades at $73.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BND's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VBMPX has a market cap of 359.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VBMPX trades at $9.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBMPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VBMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VBMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VBMPX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VTBNX has a market cap of 317B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VTBNX trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTBNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VTBNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VTBNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VTBNX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BNDX has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BNDX trades at $49.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BNDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BNDX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VTABX has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VTABX trades at $19.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTABX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VTABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VTABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VTABX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VTIFX has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VTIFX trades at $29.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VTIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VTIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VTIFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BFAFX has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BFAFX trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFAFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BFAFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, FXNAX has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while FXNAX trades at $10.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to FXNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to FXNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check FXNAX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VBIRX has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VBIRX trades at $10.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VBIRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VBIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VBIRX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VCIT has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VCIT trades at $82.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VCIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VCIT's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VICSX has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VICSX trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VICSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VICSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VICSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VICSX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BAGIX has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BAGIX trades at $9.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BAGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BAGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BAGIX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BAGSX has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BAGSX trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAGSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BAGSX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, JCBZX has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while JCBZX trades at $10.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCBZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to JCBZX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to JCBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check JCBZX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, WOBDX has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while WOBDX trades at $10.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOBDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to WOBDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to WOBDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check WOBDX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, SGOV has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while SGOV trades at $100.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to SGOV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to SGOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check SGOV's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, TLT has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while TLT trades at $86.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLT's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to TLT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is less volatile compared to TLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check TLT's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BIV has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BIV trades at $76.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BIV's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VBILX has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VBILX trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBILX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VBILX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VBILX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VBILX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VCSH has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VCSH trades at $79.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VCSH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VCSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VCSH's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VSCSX has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VSCSX trades at $21.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VSCSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VSCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VSCSX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VTEAX has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VTEAX trades at $19.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTEAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VTEAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VTEAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VTEAX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, FTBFX has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while FTBFX trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to FTBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to FTBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check FTBFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BCOSX has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BCOSX trades at $10.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCOSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BCOSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BCOSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BCOSX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BCOIX has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BCOIX trades at $10.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCOIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BCOIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BCOIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BCOIX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, IEF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while IEF trades at $94.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEF's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to IEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to IEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check IEF's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, IUSB has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while IUSB trades at $45.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSB's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to IUSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check IUSB's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, MWTRX has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while MWTRX trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to MWTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to MWTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check MWTRX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, MWTSX has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while MWTSX trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to MWTSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to MWTSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check MWTSX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, MWTIX has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while MWTIX trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to MWTIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to MWTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check MWTIX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, LQD has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while LQD trades at $108.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQD's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to LQD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to LQD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check LQD's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, DLTNX has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while DLTNX trades at $8.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to DLTNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to DLTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check DLTNX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, DBLTX has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while DBLTX trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBLTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to DBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to DBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check DBLTX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, GIBIX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while GIBIX trades at $23.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to GIBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to GIBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check GIBIX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, GIBAX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while GIBAX trades at $23.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to GIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to GIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check GIBAX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, GIBCX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while GIBCX trades at $23.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to GIBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to GIBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check GIBCX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, GIBRX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while GIBRX trades at $23.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to GIBRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to GIBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check GIBRX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, GIBLX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while GIBLX trades at $23.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to GIBLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to GIBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check GIBLX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, PTRQX has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while PTRQX trades at $11.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRQX's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to PTRQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to PTRQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check PTRQX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, PDBZX has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while PDBZX trades at $11.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDBZX's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to PDBZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to PDBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check PDBZX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, IBFFX has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while IBFFX trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to IBFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to IBFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check IBFFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, JHNBX has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while JHNBX trades at $13.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHNBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to JHNBX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to JHNBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check JHNBX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, JBFRX has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while JBFRX trades at $13.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to JBFRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to JBFRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check JBFRX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, JHBIX has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while JHBIX trades at $13.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to JHBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to JHBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check JHBIX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, USHY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while USHY trades at $37.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USHY's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to USHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to USHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check USHY's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, AFTFX has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while AFTFX trades at $12.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFTFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to AFTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to AFTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check AFTFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, NHMCX has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while NHMCX trades at $18.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to NHMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to NHMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check NHMCX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, IGSB has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while IGSB trades at $52.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to IGSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to IGSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check IGSB's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, LBNVX has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while LBNVX trades at $7.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBNVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to LBNVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to LBNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check LBNVX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, SHV has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while SHV trades at $110.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to SHV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to SHV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check SHV's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, ANBEX has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while ANBEX trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANBEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to ANBEX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to ANBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check ANBEX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, FBND has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while FBND trades at $45.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBND's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to FBND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to FBND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check FBND's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, HYG has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while HYG trades at $80.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYG's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to HYG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to HYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check HYG's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, PFORX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while PFORX trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to PFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to PFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check PFORX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, PFOAX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while PFOAX trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFOAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to PFOAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to PFOAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check PFOAX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, PFBPX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while PFBPX trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFBPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to PFBPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to PFBPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check PFBPX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, FTRBX has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while FTRBX trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to FTRBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to FTRBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check FTRBX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VCORX has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VCORX trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VCORX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VCORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VCORX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VCOBX has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VCOBX trades at $17.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCOBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VCOBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VCOBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VCOBX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VUBFX has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VUBFX trades at $10.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VUBFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VUBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VUBFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, USIG has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while USIG trades at $51.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to USIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to USIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check USIG's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BFIFX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BFIFX trades at $9.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BFIFX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BFIFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, LUBAX has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while LUBAX trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to LUBAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to LUBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check LUBAX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, NHMFX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while NHMFX trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMFX's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to NHMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to NHMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check NHMFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, NHCCX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while NHCCX trades at $13.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHCCX's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to NHCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to NHCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check NHCCX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, NHMAX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while NHMAX trades at $13.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMAX's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to NHMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to NHMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check NHMAX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, NHMRX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while NHMRX trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMRX's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to NHMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to NHMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check NHMRX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VBLTX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VBLTX trades at $15.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBLTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VBLTX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, TLH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while TLH trades at $99.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to TLH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is less volatile compared to TLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check TLH's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BIMSX has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BIMSX trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIMSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BIMSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BIMSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BIMSX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BSBSX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BSBSX trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BSBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BSBSX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BSBIX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BSBIX trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BSBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BSBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BSBIX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VCLT has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VCLT trades at $75.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VCLT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is less volatile compared to VCLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VCLT's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, VLTCX has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while VLTCX trades at $20.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLTCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to VLTCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to VLTCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check VLTCX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, FBNDX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while FBNDX trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBNDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to FBNDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to FBNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check FBNDX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, FIKQX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while FIKQX trades at $7.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIKQX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to FIKQX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to FIKQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check FIKQX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, FIPDX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while FIPDX trades at $9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIPDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to FIPDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to FIPDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check FIPDX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, RCWAX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while RCWAX trades at $16.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCWAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to RCWAX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to RCWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check RCWAX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, WBFFX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while WBFFX trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to WBFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to WBFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check WBFFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, SPIB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while SPIB trades at $33.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to SPIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to SPIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check SPIB's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, SUB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while SUB trades at $106.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to SUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to SUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check SUB's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, WIPIX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while WIPIX trades at $11.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIPIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to WIPIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to WIPIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check WIPIX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, STYAX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while STYAX trades at $11.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to STYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to STYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check STYAX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, IIBAX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while IIBAX trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to IIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to IIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check IIBAX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, IICIX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while IICIX trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IICIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to IICIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to IICIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check IICIX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, IIBZX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while IIBZX trades at $8.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIBZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to IIBZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to IIBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check IIBZX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, PTIAX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while PTIAX trades at $19.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to PTIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to PTIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check PTIAX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, BUBSX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while BUBSX trades at $10.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to BUBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to BUBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check BUBSX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, TRBFX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while TRBFX trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to TRBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to TRBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check TRBFX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, SCHI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while SCHI trades at $22.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to SCHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check SCHI's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, FLOT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while FLOT trades at $51.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to FLOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to FLOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check FLOT's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, FUTBX has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while FUTBX trades at $8.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUTBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to FUTBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to FUTBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check FUTBX's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, SPAB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while SPAB trades at $25.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to SPAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to SPAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check SPAB's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, SPHY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while SPHY trades at $23.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHY's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to SPHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to SPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check SPHY's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, JNK has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while JNK trades at $97.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNK's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to JNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to JNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check JNK's competition here

EMAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMAG stands at 15.8M. In comparison, SCHZ has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAG is priced at $20.38, while SCHZ trades at $23.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMAG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAG's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAG is more volatile compared to SCHZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAG.Check SCHZ's competition here