Emergence Global Enterprises Inc.
Emergence Global Enterprises Inc. ELOAF Peers
See (ELOAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELOAF | $0.01 | N/A | 22.7B | 0.80 | $0.01 | N/A |
| NSRGY | $105.72 | -1.48% | 274B | 20.73 | $5.10 | +3.17% |
| NSRGF | $105.62 | -1.48% | 271.5B | 20.75 | $5.09 | +3.44% |
| GPDNF | $85.78 | -0.95% | 55.3B | 24.93 | $3.44 | +2.82% |
| DANOY | $16.99 | -0.70% | 54.7B | 23.93 | $0.71 | +2.74% |
| TUFBY | $11.53 | +35.65% | 47.3B | 16.47 | $0.70 | +3.39% |
| AJINY | $24.60 | +0.53% | 24.5B | 102.50 | $0.24 | +1.09% |
| ASBFF | $29.04 | N/A | 20.9B | 12.10 | $2.40 | +2.91% |
| AJINF | $20.72 | -50.07% | 20.6B | 86.33 | $0.24 | +1.32% |
| ASBFY | $28.27 | -1.50% | 20.4B | 11.78 | $2.40 | +2.99% |
Stock Comparison
ELOAF vs NSRGY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 274B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while NSRGY trades at $105.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs NSRGF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 271.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while NSRGF trades at $105.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs GPDNF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while GPDNF trades at $85.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to GPDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs DANOY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while DANOY trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TUFBY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TUFBY trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TUFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs AJINY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while AJINY trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 102.50. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs ASBFF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while ASBFF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to ASBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs AJINF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while AJINF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 86.33. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to AJINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs ASBFY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while ASBFY trades at $28.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs KRYAY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while KRYAY trades at $108.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs KRYAF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while KRYAF trades at $102.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to KRYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs JBSAY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while JBSAY trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs GRBMF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while GRBMF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to GRBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs BMBOY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while BMBOY trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to BMBOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs JDEPF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while JDEPF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to JDEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs WHGLY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while WHGLY trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs ORKLY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while ORKLY trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs WHGRF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while WHGRF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs ORKLF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while ORKLF trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to ORKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs KIKOY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while KIKOY trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to KIKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs CIADF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while CIADF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to CIADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TYCMY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TYCMY trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs KIKOF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while KIKOF trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to KIKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TCYMF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TCYMF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TCYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs CIADY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while CIADY trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 570.00. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TTAZF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TTAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs PIFFY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while PIFFY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs SAPIF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while SAPIF trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -72.04. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to SAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs WWNTF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while WWNTF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to WWNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs CFEIY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while CFEIY trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to CFEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs GCHOY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while GCHOY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs MEJHY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while MEJHY trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to MEJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs GPAGF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while GPAGF trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to GPAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs SDPNF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TSUKY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TSUKY trades at $69.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs ARHUF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while ARHUF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to ARHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs DLLFF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to DLLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs NFPDF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while NFPDF trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to NFPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs CHFLF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while CHFLF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to CHFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TSUKF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TSUKF trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs MEJHF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs EMLZF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while EMLZF trades at $990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs SMPFF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to SMPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs ARZTY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while ARZTY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs IOIOF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to IOIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs PIFMY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while PIFMY trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to PIFMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs PIFMF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while PIFMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to PIFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs NSLYF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while NSLYF trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 44.95. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to NSLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs MRRTY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while MRRTY trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs NIPMY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while NIPMY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to NIPMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs ACOPF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while ACOPF trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to ACOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs UVRBF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while UVRBF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to UVRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs CRWKF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TATYY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TATYY trades at $30.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 48.34. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TATYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs UVRBY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while UVRBY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to UVRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs NSFMF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to NSFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TATYF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TATYF trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TATYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs GLAPY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while GLAPY trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to GLAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs GLAPF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while GLAPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to GLAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs NCHEY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs YMZBY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while YMZBY trades at $152.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs FPAFY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while FPAFY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs FPAFF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while FPAFF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to FPAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs CBCFF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while CBCFF trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to CBCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs EBRPY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to EBRPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs EBRPF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while EBRPF trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to EBRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs SUEZF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while SUEZF trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to SUEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs CLBEY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while CLBEY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to CLBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs SUEZY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while SUEZY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is -20.48. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to SUEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs PRBZF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while PRBZF trades at $57.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to PRBZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs PRRFY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while PRRFY trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to PRRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs LYSFF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while LYSFF trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to LYSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs LYSFY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while LYSFY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to LYSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs ARZTF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs NHFOF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while NHFOF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to NHFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs MLFNF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while MLFNF trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to MLFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs FTROF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while FTROF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs PFODF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while PFODF trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TBLMF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TBLMF trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs SGLJF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs GRPBF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to GRPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs HOFJF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while HOFJF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to HOFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TBLMY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TBLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs FSRCY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while FSRCY trades at $109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs AVSFY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while AVSFY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to AVSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs YNNHF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while YNNHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to YNNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs TUFUF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while TUFUF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs FNEVF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to FNEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs HLFGY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs VTSYF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, VTSYF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while VTSYF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas VTSYF's P/E ratio is 128.00. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to VTSYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to VTSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs NISUY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while NISUY trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to NISUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs FNEVY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while FNEVY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to FNEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs AKEJF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while AKEJF trades at $35.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs JWLLF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while JWLLF trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to JWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs GBFBF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to GBFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs GNCGY Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while GNCGY trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to GNCGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs HLTFF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HLTFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while HLTFF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas HLTFF's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HLTFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to HLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs BKKVF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BKKVF has a market cap of 995.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while BKKVF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas BKKVF's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BKKVF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to BKKVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.
ELOAF vs GNCGF Comparison
ELOAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELOAF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GNCGF has a market cap of 981M. Regarding current trading prices, ELOAF is priced at $0.01, while GNCGF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.80, whereas GNCGF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ELOAF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GNCGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELOAF is more volatile compared to GNCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELOAF.