Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc.
Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc. (ELMSQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ELMSQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELMSQ | $0.10 | +0.00% | 12.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TOYOF | $18.60 | -6.26% | 242.4B | 8.45 | $2.20 | +3.17% |
| BYDDF | $14.42 | -0.15% | 134.9B | 20.25 | $0.71 | +1.28% |
| BYDDY | $14.32 | +0.14% | 133.6B | 20.14 | $0.71 | +1.05% |
| BAMXF | $104.63 | +1.34% | 64.4B | 9.63 | $10.87 | +4.65% |
| BYMOF | $91.47 | +0.00% | 63.7B | 8.41 | $10.87 | +5.52% |
| MBGAF | $62.63 | -0.63% | 60.3B | 7.56 | $8.28 | +7.68% |
| MBGYY | $15.65 | -0.32% | 60.2B | 7.56 | $2.07 | +7.62% |
| VLKAF | $119.85 | -0.35% | 60.1B | 6.14 | $19.51 | +5.92% |
| VWAGY | $11.93 | -0.75% | 59.9B | 6.12 | $1.95 | +5.97% |
Stock Comparison
ELMSQ vs TOYOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 242.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while TOYOF trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check TOYOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BYDDF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BYDDF trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BYDDF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BYDDY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 133.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BYDDY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BYDDY's competition here
ELMSQ vs BAMXF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BAMXF trades at $104.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and BAMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAMXF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BYMOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BYMOF trades at $91.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BYMOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs MBGAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MBGAF trades at $62.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MBGAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs MBGYY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MBGYY trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MBGYY's competition here
ELMSQ vs VLKAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VLKAF trades at $119.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check VLKAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs VWAGY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VWAGY trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check VWAGY's competition here
ELMSQ vs VLKPF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VLKPF trades at $117.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and VLKPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLKPF's competition here
ELMSQ vs VWAPY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VWAPY trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check VWAPY's competition here
ELMSQ vs DRPRF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while DRPRF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check DRPRF's competition here
ELMSQ vs DRPRY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while DRPRY trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check DRPRY's competition here
ELMSQ vs MAHMF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MAHMF trades at $38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MAHMF's competition here
ELMSQ vs HNDAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while HNDAF trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check HNDAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs HYMTF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check HYMTF's competition here
ELMSQ vs TYIDY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while TYIDY trades at $110.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check TYIDY's competition here
ELMSQ vs TYIDF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while TYIDF trades at $106.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check TYIDF's competition here
ELMSQ vs GWLLF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GWLLF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check GWLLF's competition here
ELMSQ vs GELYF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GELYF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check GELYF's competition here
ELMSQ vs GELYY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GELYY trades at $50.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check GELYY's competition here
ELMSQ vs SZKMY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while SZKMY trades at $53.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check SZKMY's competition here
ELMSQ vs SZKMF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while SZKMF trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check SZKMF's competition here
ELMSQ vs HYMLF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and HYMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYMLF's competition here
ELMSQ vs EXXRF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while EXXRF trades at $104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check EXXRF's competition here
ELMSQ vs GWLLY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GWLLY trades at $23.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check GWLLY's competition here
ELMSQ vs XPNGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while XPNGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -27.03. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and XPNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XPNGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BMWYY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BMWYY's competition here
ELMSQ vs FUJHF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while FUJHF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and FUJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUJHF's competition here
ELMSQ vs FUJHY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while FUJHY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check FUJHY's competition here
ELMSQ vs POAHY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while POAHY trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check POAHY's competition here
ELMSQ vs POAHF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while POAHF trades at $43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check POAHF's competition here
ELMSQ vs YAMHY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check YAMHY's competition here
ELMSQ vs NIOIF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NIOIF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and NIOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIOIF's competition here
ELMSQ vs RNSDF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while RNSDF trades at $36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check RNSDF's competition here
ELMSQ vs RNLSY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while RNLSY trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check RNLSY's competition here
ELMSQ vs ISUZY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ISUZY trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ISUZY's competition here
ELMSQ vs GNZUF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GNZUF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check GNZUF's competition here
ELMSQ vs JCYGY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while JCYGY trades at $44.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check JCYGY's competition here
ELMSQ vs JCYCF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while JCYCF trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and JCYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCYCF's competition here
ELMSQ vs ISUZF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ISUZF trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ISUZF's competition here
ELMSQ vs NSANY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NSANY trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSANY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check NSANY's competition here
ELMSQ vs YMHAY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while YMHAY trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check YMHAY's competition here
ELMSQ vs NSANF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NSANF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check NSANF's competition here
ELMSQ vs YAMHF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while YAMHF trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and YAMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAMHF's competition here
ELMSQ vs VLVOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VLVOF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 219.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check VLVOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs DNFGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while DNFGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and DNFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNFGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs VLVCY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VLVCY trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 139.83. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check VLVCY's competition here
ELMSQ vs IVCGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while IVCGF trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and IVCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVCGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs DNFGY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while DNFGY trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 650.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check DNFGY's competition here
ELMSQ vs YADGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while YADGF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and YADGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YADGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs MZDAY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MZDAY trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MZDAY's competition here
ELMSQ vs MZDAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MZDAF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MZDAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs MMTOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MMTOF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MMTOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs SMEBF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while SMEBF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and SMEBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMEBF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BCCMY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BCCMY trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and BCCMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCCMY's competition here
ELMSQ vs BCAUF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BCAUF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BCAUF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BMCLF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BMCLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BMCLF's competition here
ELMSQ vs NFYEF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NFYEF trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check NFYEF's competition here
ELMSQ vs HINOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while HINOF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and HINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HINOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs HINOY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while HINOY trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check HINOY's competition here
ELMSQ vs AMGDF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while AMGDF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check AMGDF's competition here
ELMSQ vs FOVSY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 912.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while FOVSY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check FOVSY's competition here
ELMSQ vs ARGGY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 887.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ARGGY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ARGGY's competition here
ELMSQ vs ELMWQ Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and ELMWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMWQ's competition here
ELMSQ vs NSNHF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check NSNHF's competition here
ELMSQ vs PIAGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 836.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while PIAGF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check PIAGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs KRSOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and KRSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRSOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs FHYDF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while FHYDF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and FHYDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FHYDF's competition here
ELMSQ vs RIDEQ Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check RIDEQ's competition here
ELMSQ vs NRDE Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NRDE trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check NRDE's competition here
ELMSQ vs SEVCF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while SEVCF trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and SEVCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEVCF's competition here
ELMSQ vs LFEV Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while LFEV trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and LFEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LFEV's competition here
ELMSQ vs EVTGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check EVTGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs TUGAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while TUGAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check TUGAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs FSRNQ Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check FSRNQ's competition here
ELMSQ vs ELCR Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ELCR's competition here
ELMSQ vs GKIT Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 587.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GKIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GKIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check GKIT's competition here
ELMSQ vs ELEK Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 465.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ELEK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ELEK's competition here
ELMSQ vs RONN Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 228.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check RONN's competition here
ELMSQ vs GACR Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and GACR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GACR's competition here
ELMSQ vs CSBI Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 15.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while CSBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check CSBI's competition here
ELMSQ vs ELIO Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 14.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and ELIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELIO's competition here
ELMSQ vs NVYAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and NVYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVYAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs ARVLF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ARVLF's competition here
ELMSQ vs NDVR Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and NDVR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDVR's competition here
ELMSQ vs DDAIF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check DDAIF's competition here