Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc.
Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc. ELMSQ Peers
See (ELMSQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELMSQ | $0.09 | +24.14% | 11.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TOYOF | $18.33 | N/A | 239.2B | 7.33 | $2.50 | +3.35% |
| BYDDF | $59.50 | +0.49% | 177.1B | 27.80 | $2.14 | +0.73% |
| BYDDY | $118.27 | +0.86% | 87.4B | 27.70 | $4.27 | +0.73% |
| VWAGY | $10.77 | -0.37% | 55.6B | 5.13 | $2.10 | +14.34% |
| VWAPY | $10.54 | -0.19% | 55.6B | 5.02 | $2.10 | +11.92% |
| MBGAF | $57.56 | -0.28% | 55.4B | 5.60 | $10.27 | +9.55% |
| MBGYY | $14.31 | +0.21% | 55.1B | 5.57 | $2.57 | +8.34% |
| BAMXF | $87.55 | +5.37% | 54.2B | 7.30 | $11.99 | +5.47% |
| VLKPF | $106.50 | +5.34% | 53.6B | 5.06 | $21.03 | +13.97% |
Stock Comparison
ELMSQ vs TOYOF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 239.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while TOYOF trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs BYDDF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 177.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while BYDDF trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs BYDDY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while BYDDY trades at $118.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs VWAGY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while VWAGY trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs VWAPY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while VWAPY trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs MBGAF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while MBGAF trades at $57.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs MBGYY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while MBGYY trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs BAMXF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while BAMXF trades at $87.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs VLKPF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while VLKPF trades at $106.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs VLKAF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while VLKAF trades at $106.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs BYMOF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while BYMOF trades at $81.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs DRPRF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while DRPRF trades at $52.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs HNDAF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while HNDAF trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs MAHMF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while MAHMF trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs TYIDY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while TYIDY trades at $128.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs TYIDF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while TYIDF trades at $124.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs HYMTF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while HYMTF trades at $50.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs GELYY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while GELYY trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs GELYF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while GELYF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs SZKMF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while SZKMF trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs SZKMY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while SZKMY trades at $49.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs GWLLF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while GWLLF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs HYMLF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs EXXRF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while EXXRF trades at $101.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs DRPRY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while DRPRY trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs BMWYY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs XPNGF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while XPNGF trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs RNLSY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while RNLSY trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs RNSDF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while RNSDF trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs GWLLY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while GWLLY trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs FUJHF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while FUJHF trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs FUJHY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while FUJHY trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs YAMHY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs POAHF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while POAHF trades at $41.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs ISUZY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while ISUZY trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs GNZUF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while GNZUF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs NSANF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while NSANF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs ISUZF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while ISUZF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs NSANY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while NSANY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSANY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs JCYGY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while JCYGY trades at $39.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs NIOIF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while NIOIF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs YMHAY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while YMHAY trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs JCYCF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while JCYCF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs YAMHF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while YAMHF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs POAHY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while POAHY trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs VLVOF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while VLVOF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs VLVCY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while VLVCY trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs IVCGF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while IVCGF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs DNFGY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while DNFGY trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 532.20. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs DNFGF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while DNFGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs MZDAF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while MZDAF trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs MMTOF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while MMTOF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs YADGF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while YADGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs MZDAY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while MZDAY trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs SMEBF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while SMEBF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs BCCMY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while BCCMY trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs BMCLF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while BMCLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs FOVSY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while FOVSY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs HINOY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while HINOY trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs BCAUF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while BCAUF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs HINOF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while HINOF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs NFYEF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while NFYEF trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -354.33. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs AMGDF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while AMGDF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs ARGGY Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 993.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while ARGGY trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs NSNHF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs PIAGF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while PIAGF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs KRSOF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs RIDEQ Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs FHYDF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while FHYDF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs SEVCF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while SEVCF trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs NRDE Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while NRDE trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs ELMWQ Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs LFEV Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while LFEV trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs GKIT Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while GKIT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GKIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs EVTGF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs FSRNQ Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs ELCR Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs ELEK Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 665.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while ELEK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs TUGAF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 386.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while TUGAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs RONN Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 228.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs GACR Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs CSBI Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 32.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while CSBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs ELIO Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 14.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs NVYAF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs ARVLF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 5.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs NDVR Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.
ELMSQ vs DDAIF Comparison
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 11.2M. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.09, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is more volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.