Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc.
Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc. (ELMSQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ELMSQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELMSQ | $0.10 | +0.00% | 12.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TOYOF | $18.59 | -0.95% | 234.8B | 7.41 | $2.43 | +3.28% |
| BYDDF | $14.00 | -9.00% | 112.2B | 40.78 | $0.36 | +29.46% |
| BAMXF | $98.00 | +0.00% | 58.1B | 7.99 | $12.27 | +4.89% |
| BYMOF | $91.47 | +0.00% | 57.2B | 7.45 | $12.27 | +5.52% |
| MBGAF | $56.65 | -3.46% | 55.3B | 7.01 | $8.20 | +8.32% |
| VWAPY | $10.21 | -4.04% | 55.3B | 5.30 | $1.97 | +6.86% |
| MBGYY | $14.13 | -3.02% | 54.8B | 6.94 | $2.05 | +8.25% |
| VWAGY | $10.50 | -3.52% | 54.8B | 5.41 | $1.97 | +6.63% |
| VLKAF | $105.59 | -3.68% | 53.3B | 5.45 | $19.69 | +6.61% |
Stock Comparison
ELMSQ vs TOYOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 234.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while TOYOF trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check TOYOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BYDDF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BYDDF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 40.78. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BYDDF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BAMXF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BAMXF trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BAMXF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BYMOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BYMOF trades at $91.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BYMOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs MBGAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MBGAF trades at $56.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MBGAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs VWAPY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VWAPY trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check VWAPY's competition here
ELMSQ vs MBGYY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MBGYY trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MBGYY's competition here
ELMSQ vs VWAGY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VWAGY trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check VWAGY's competition here
ELMSQ vs VLKAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VLKAF trades at $105.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check VLKAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs VLKPF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VLKPF trades at $105.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check VLKPF's competition here
ELMSQ vs DRPRY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while DRPRY trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check DRPRY's competition here
ELMSQ vs DRPRF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while DRPRF trades at $51.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check DRPRF's competition here
ELMSQ vs MAHMF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MAHMF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MAHMF's competition here
ELMSQ vs HNDAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while HNDAF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check HNDAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs HYMTF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check HYMTF's competition here
ELMSQ vs TYIDF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while TYIDF trades at $112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and TYIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYIDF's competition here
ELMSQ vs TYIDY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while TYIDY trades at $106.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check TYIDY's competition here
ELMSQ vs GWLLF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GWLLF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and GWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWLLF's competition here
ELMSQ vs GELYY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GELYY trades at $44.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check GELYY's competition here
ELMSQ vs GELYF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GELYF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check GELYF's competition here
ELMSQ vs HYMLF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and HYMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYMLF's competition here
ELMSQ vs SZKMF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while SZKMF trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check SZKMF's competition here
ELMSQ vs SZKMY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while SZKMY trades at $44.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check SZKMY's competition here
ELMSQ vs EXXRF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while EXXRF trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check EXXRF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BMWYY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BMWYY's competition here
ELMSQ vs XPNGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while XPNGF trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -22.38. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and XPNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XPNGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs GWLLY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GWLLY trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and GWLLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWLLY's competition here
ELMSQ vs FUJHF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while FUJHF trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and FUJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUJHF's competition here
ELMSQ vs FUJHY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while FUJHY trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check FUJHY's competition here
ELMSQ vs BYDDY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BYDDY trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BYDDY's competition here
ELMSQ vs RNSDF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while RNSDF trades at $45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and RNSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNSDF's competition here
ELMSQ vs POAHY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while POAHY trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check POAHY's competition here
ELMSQ vs YAMHY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check YAMHY's competition here
ELMSQ vs POAHF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while POAHF trades at $40.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check POAHF's competition here
ELMSQ vs RNLSY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while RNLSY trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check RNLSY's competition here
ELMSQ vs NIOIF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NIOIF trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check NIOIF's competition here
ELMSQ vs GNZUF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GNZUF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -20.93. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check GNZUF's competition here
ELMSQ vs ISUZY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ISUZY trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ISUZY's competition here
ELMSQ vs ISUZF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ISUZF trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ISUZF's competition here
ELMSQ vs JCYCF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while JCYCF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and JCYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCYCF's competition here
ELMSQ vs JCYGY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while JCYGY trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check JCYGY's competition here
ELMSQ vs NSANY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NSANY trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSANY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check NSANY's competition here
ELMSQ vs YMHAY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while YMHAY trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check YMHAY's competition here
ELMSQ vs YAMHF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while YAMHF trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and YAMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAMHF's competition here
ELMSQ vs NSANF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NSANF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and NSANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSANF's competition here
ELMSQ vs YADGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while YADGF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and YADGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YADGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs VLVOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VLVOF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 219.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check VLVOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs VLVCY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while VLVCY trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 129.67. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and VLVCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLVCY's competition here
ELMSQ vs IVCGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while IVCGF trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check IVCGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs DNFGY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while DNFGY trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 600.40. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and DNFGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNFGY's competition here
ELMSQ vs DNFGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while DNFGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -8.14. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check DNFGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs MZDAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MZDAF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MZDAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs MZDAY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MZDAY trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MZDAY's competition here
ELMSQ vs MMTOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while MMTOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check MMTOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs SMEBF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while SMEBF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and SMEBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMEBF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BCCMY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BCCMY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and BCCMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCCMY's competition here
ELMSQ vs BMCLF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BMCLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and BMCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMCLF's competition here
ELMSQ vs BCAUF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while BCAUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check BCAUF's competition here
ELMSQ vs NFYEF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NFYEF trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -458.83. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check NFYEF's competition here
ELMSQ vs HINOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while HINOF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and HINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HINOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs HINOY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while HINOY trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check HINOY's competition here
ELMSQ vs AMGDF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while AMGDF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check AMGDF's competition here
ELMSQ vs ARGGY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 903.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ARGGY trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ARGGY's competition here
ELMSQ vs ELMWQ Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and ELMWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMWQ's competition here
ELMSQ vs NSNHF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and NSNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSNHF's competition here
ELMSQ vs PIAGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 805.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while PIAGF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and PIAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIAGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs FOVSY Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 772M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while FOVSY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and FOVSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOVSY's competition here
ELMSQ vs KRSOF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and KRSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRSOF's competition here
ELMSQ vs FHYDF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while FHYDF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check FHYDF's competition here
ELMSQ vs RIDEQ Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check RIDEQ's competition here
ELMSQ vs NRDE Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NRDE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check NRDE's competition here
ELMSQ vs SEVCF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while SEVCF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check SEVCF's competition here
ELMSQ vs GKIT Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GKIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GKIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and GKIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GKIT's competition here
ELMSQ vs LFEV Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while LFEV trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check LFEV's competition here
ELMSQ vs EVTGF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check EVTGF's competition here
ELMSQ vs ELEK Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ELEK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ELEK's competition here
ELMSQ vs TUGAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while TUGAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check TUGAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs FSRNQ Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check FSRNQ's competition here
ELMSQ vs ELCR Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ELCR's competition here
ELMSQ vs CSBI Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 680.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while CSBI trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and CSBI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSBI's competition here
ELMSQ vs ELIO Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 283.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ELIO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check ELIO's competition here
ELMSQ vs RONN Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 228.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check RONN's competition here
ELMSQ vs GACR Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and GACR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GACR's competition here
ELMSQ vs NVYAF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and NVYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVYAF's competition here
ELMSQ vs ARVLF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and ARVLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARVLF's competition here
ELMSQ vs NDVR Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ and NDVR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDVR's competition here
ELMSQ vs DDAIF Comparison August 2025
ELMSQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMSQ stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELMSQ is priced at $0.10, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMSQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, ELMSQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMSQ is less volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMSQ.Check DDAIF's competition here