Elementis plc

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, 0QPS.L has a market cap of 30.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while 0QPS.L trades at $3,293.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas 0QPS.L's P/E ratio is 37.26. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0QPS.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to 0QPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, 0QM9.L has a market cap of 17.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while 0QM9.L trades at $730.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas 0QM9.L's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0QM9.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to 0QM9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, 0QJS.L has a market cap of 5.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while 0QJS.L trades at $17.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas 0QJS.L's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0QJS.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to 0QJS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, CRDA.L has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while CRDA.L trades at $3,108.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas CRDA.L's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRDA.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to CRDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, JMAT.L has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while JMAT.L trades at $1,326.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas JMAT.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JMAT.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to JMAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, 0I74.L has a market cap of 873.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while 0I74.L trades at $13.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas 0I74.L's P/E ratio is 0.84. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0I74.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to 0I74.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, VCT.L has a market cap of 787.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while VCT.L trades at $905.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas VCT.L's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VCT.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to VCT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, ESNT.L has a market cap of 275.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while ESNT.L trades at $96.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas ESNT.L's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESNT.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to ESNT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, TET.L has a market cap of 169.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while TET.L trades at $280.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas TET.L's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TET.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is less volatile compared to TET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, SYNT.L has a market cap of 163.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while SYNT.L trades at $99.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas SYNT.L's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SYNT.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is less volatile compared to SYNT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, 0HB7.L has a market cap of 155.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while 0HB7.L trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas 0HB7.L's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0HB7.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ELM.L has daily volatility of 4.54 and 0HB7.L has daily volatility of N/A.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, 49GP.L has a market cap of 125.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while 49GP.L trades at $90.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas 49GP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 49GP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is less volatile compared to 49GP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, ZTF.L has a market cap of 120.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while ZTF.L trades at $248.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas ZTF.L's P/E ratio is -41.33. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZTF.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to ZTF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, 50GP.L has a market cap of 115.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while 50GP.L trades at $83.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas 50GP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 50GP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to 50GP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, IOF.L has a market cap of 43.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while IOF.L trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas IOF.L's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IOF.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is less volatile compared to IOF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, ITX.L has a market cap of 14.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while ITX.L trades at $105.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas ITX.L's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ITX.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to ITX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, GEX.L has a market cap of 10.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while GEX.L trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas GEX.L's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GEX.L's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is less volatile compared to GEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, DCTA.L has a market cap of 7.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while DCTA.L trades at $7.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas DCTA.L's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DCTA.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to DCTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, HDD.L has a market cap of 5.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while HDD.L trades at $6.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas HDD.L's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HDD.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to HDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, HAYD.L has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while HAYD.L trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas HAYD.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HAYD.L's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to HAYD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, AGM.L has a market cap of 3.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while AGM.L trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas AGM.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AGM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to AGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, VRS.L has a market cap of 1.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while VRS.L trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas VRS.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VRS.L's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is less volatile compared to VRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, ESKN.L has a market cap of 714518.00. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while ESKN.L trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas ESKN.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESKN.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is more volatile compared to ESKN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, ZED.L has a market cap of 456429.00. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while ZED.L trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas ZED.L's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZED.L's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is less volatile compared to ZED.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, BIOM.L has a market cap of 386669.00. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while BIOM.L trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas BIOM.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BIOM.L's ROE of -3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ELM.L is less volatile compared to BIOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELM.L.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, 87FZ.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while 87FZ.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas 87FZ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 87FZ.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ELM.L has daily volatility of 4.54 and 87FZ.L has daily volatility of N/A.

ELM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELM.L stands at 737.63M. In comparison, MACP.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ELM.L is priced at $124.60, while MACP.L trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -20.77, whereas MACP.L's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ELM.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MACP.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ELM.L has daily volatility of 4.54 and MACP.L has daily volatility of N/A.