Ecclesiastical Insurance Office plc

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, 0V5H.L has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while 0V5H.L trades at £42.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas 0V5H.L's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0V5H.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is more volatile compared to 0V5H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check 0V5H.L's competition here

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, 0H68.L has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while 0H68.L trades at £103.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas 0H68.L's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0H68.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is more volatile compared to 0H68.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check 0H68.L's competition here

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, 0AH3.L has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while 0AH3.L trades at £52.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas 0AH3.L's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0AH3.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is more volatile compared to 0AH3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check 0AH3.L's competition here

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, 0KRX.L has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while 0KRX.L trades at £104.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas 0KRX.L's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0KRX.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is more volatile compared to 0KRX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check 0KRX.L's competition here

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, PRU.L has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while PRU.L trades at £934.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas PRU.L's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRU.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is more volatile compared to PRU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check PRU.L's competition here

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, 0LJN.L has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while 0LJN.L trades at £80.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas 0LJN.L's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0LJN.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is more volatile compared to 0LJN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check 0LJN.L's competition here

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, PHNX.L has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while PHNX.L trades at £649.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas PHNX.L's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PHNX.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is more volatile compared to PHNX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check PHNX.L's competition here

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, 0JV3.L has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while 0JV3.L trades at £34.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas 0JV3.L's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0JV3.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is more volatile compared to 0JV3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check 0JV3.L's competition here

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, OMU.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while OMU.L trades at £52.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas OMU.L's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMU.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is more volatile compared to OMU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check OMU.L's competition here

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, CSN.L has a market cap of 599.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while CSN.L trades at £260.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas CSN.L's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSN.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is more volatile compared to CSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check CSN.L's competition here

ELLA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLA.L stands at 151.7M. In comparison, HSD.L has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLA.L is priced at £142.50, while HSD.L trades at £48.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas HSD.L's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ELLA.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HSD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLA.L is less volatile compared to HSD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLA.L.Check HSD.L's competition here