Canoe EIT Income Fund

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while BNC.TO trades at $27.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, NUBF.TO has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while NUBF.TO trades at $20.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas NUBF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NUBF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to NUBF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while NREA.TO trades at $23.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to NREA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, PFIA.TO has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while PFIA.TO trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas PFIA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PFIA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PFIA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, AD-UN.TO has a market cap of 844.76M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while AD-UN.TO trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas AD-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AD-UN.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to AD-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, MKB.TO has a market cap of 811.75M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while MKB.TO trades at $19.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas MKB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MKB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MKB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, FIE.TO has a market cap of 782.10M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while FIE.TO trades at $8.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas FIE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FIE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, HDIF.TO has a market cap of 407.38M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while HDIF.TO trades at $8.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas HDIF.TO's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HDIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to HDIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, XTR.TO has a market cap of 364.95M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while XTR.TO trades at $11.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas XTR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XTR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XTR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, CIC.TO has a market cap of 247.23M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while CIC.TO trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas CIC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, VCIP.TO has a market cap of 226.66M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while VCIP.TO trades at $26.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas VCIP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VCIP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to VCIP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, IFRF.TO has a market cap of 212.22M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while IFRF.TO trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas IFRF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IFRF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to IFRF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, CCOR.TO has a market cap of 170.49M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while CCOR.TO trades at $17.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas CCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CCOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, PBY-UN.TO has a market cap of 140.67M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while PBY-UN.TO trades at $15.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas PBY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PBY-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to PBY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, ZMI.TO has a market cap of 124.46M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while ZMI.TO trades at $17.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas ZMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZMI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to ZMI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, MGB.TO has a market cap of 118.38M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while MGB.TO trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas MGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, HUBL.TO has a market cap of 108.51M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while HUBL.TO trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas HUBL.TO's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HUBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HUBL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, FAP.TO has a market cap of 107.83M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while FAP.TO trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas FAP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FAP.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to FAP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, PLDI.TO has a market cap of 97.62M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while PLDI.TO trades at $18.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas PLDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PLDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PLDI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, MID-UN.TO has a market cap of 95.05M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while MID-UN.TO trades at $6.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas MID-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MID-UN.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MID-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, BMAX.TO has a market cap of 93.29M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while BMAX.TO trades at $13.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas BMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to BMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, PIC-A.TO has a market cap of 81.00M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while PIC-A.TO trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas PIC-A.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PIC-A.TO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to PIC-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, BGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 79.06M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while BGI-UN.TO trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas BGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BGI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to BGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, TLF.TO has a market cap of 78.58M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while TLF.TO trades at $22.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas TLF.TO's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to TLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, HTAE.TO has a market cap of 74.47M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while HTAE.TO trades at $14.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas HTAE.TO's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HTAE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to HTAE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, FFI-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while FFI-UN.TO trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas FFI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FFI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FFI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, XINC.TO has a market cap of 73.16M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while XINC.TO trades at $20.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas XINC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XINC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XINC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, XSC.TO has a market cap of 59.12M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while XSC.TO trades at $17.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas XSC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XSC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, RBN-UN.TO has a market cap of 57.32M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while RBN-UN.TO trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas RBN-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RBN-UN.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to RBN-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, HGR.TO has a market cap of 57.12M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while HGR.TO trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas HGR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to HGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, HHLE.TO has a market cap of 56.72M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while HHLE.TO trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas HHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HHLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to HHLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, XSI.TO has a market cap of 44.50M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while XSI.TO trades at $16.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas XSI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XSI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XSI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, SKG-UN.TO has a market cap of 36.16M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while SKG-UN.TO trades at $7.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas SKG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SKG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to SKG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, FCGI.TO has a market cap of 31.86M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while FCGI.TO trades at $13.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas FCGI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FCGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FCGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, RIFI.TO has a market cap of 27.29M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while RIFI.TO trades at $17.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas RIFI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RIFI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to RIFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, INC-UN.TO has a market cap of 25.35M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while INC-UN.TO trades at $7.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas INC-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INC-UN.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to INC-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, EARN.TO has a market cap of 21.77M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while EARN.TO trades at $48.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas EARN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EARN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to EARN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, PIN.TO has a market cap of 16.68M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while PIN.TO trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas PIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, PHR.TO has a market cap of 16.37M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while PHR.TO trades at $18.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas PHR.TO's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PHR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PHR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, ETP.TO has a market cap of 14.13M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while ETP.TO trades at $17.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas ETP.TO's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ETP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to ETP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, ZWQT.TO has a market cap of 11.39M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while ZWQT.TO trades at $16.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas ZWQT.TO's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZWQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to ZWQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, REIT.TO has a market cap of 9.97M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while REIT.TO trades at $20.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas REIT.TO's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to REIT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, BSO-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.68M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while BSO-UN.TO trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas BSO-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BSO-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to BSO-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, FGX.NE has a market cap of 9.05M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while FGX.NE trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas FGX.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FGX.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FGX.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, CIQ-UN.TO has a market cap of 7.51M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while CIQ-UN.TO trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas CIQ-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CIQ-UN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CIQ-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, TPAY.TO has a market cap of 7.29M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while TPAY.TO trades at $21.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas TPAY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TPAY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to TPAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, FCMI.TO has a market cap of 6.73M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while FCMI.TO trades at $13.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas FCMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FCMI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FCMI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, CES.TO has a market cap of 4.84M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while CES.TO trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas CES.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CES.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to CES.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, ENI-UN.TO has a market cap of 4.36M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while ENI-UN.TO trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas ENI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to ENI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, HID.TO has a market cap of 4.35M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while HID.TO trades at $21.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas HID.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HID.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HID.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, HBFE.TO has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while HBFE.TO trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas HBFE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HBFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to HBFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, PGI-UN.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while PGI-UN.TO trades at $7.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas PGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PGI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, HBL-UN.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while HBL-UN.TO trades at $11.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas HBL-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HBL-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to HBL-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, GDG-UN.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while GDG-UN.TO trades at $13.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas GDG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GDG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to GDG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, BUA-UN.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while BUA-UN.TO trades at $7.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas BUA-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BUA-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BUA-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, IGLB.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while IGLB.TO trades at $10.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas IGLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IGLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to IGLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, BLB-UN.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while BLB-UN.TO trades at $7.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas BLB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is less volatile compared to BLB-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.

EIT-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIT-UN.TO stands at 2.78B. In comparison, PMB-UN.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EIT-UN.TO is priced at $15.29, while PMB-UN.TO trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIT-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.66, whereas PMB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIT-UN.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PMB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIT-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PMB-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIT-UN.TO.