Eni S.p.A.
Eni S.p.A. EIPAF Peers
See (EIPAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIPAF | $15.89 | +5.34% | 46.8B | 18.06 | $0.88 | +5.90% |
| PCCYF | $0.85 | +6.59% | 205.3B | 6.53 | $0.13 | +7.44% |
| RYDAF | $32.05 | -4.47% | 191.1B | 14.63 | $2.19 | +4.38% |
| TTFNF | $59.05 | +1.74% | 131.1B | 9.89 | $5.97 | +5.85% |
| SNPMF | $0.51 | -3.77% | 84.5B | 8.50 | $0.06 | +1.32% |
| BPAQF | $4.77 | -1.14% | 74.8B | -68.14 | -$0.07 | +6.53% |
| OMVKY | $13.33 | -0.15% | 69.7B | 14.49 | $0.92 | +2.88% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | N/A | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| STOHF | $23.60 | -3.28% | 64.5B | 7.47 | $3.16 | +4.83% |
| LUKOY | $6.96 | -42.00% | 49B | 0.40 | $17.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EIPAF vs PCCYF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 205.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while PCCYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RYDAF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 191.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while RYDAF trades at $32.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs TTFNF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while TTFNF trades at $59.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SNPMF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while SNPMF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs BPAQF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while BPAQF trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is -68.14. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OMVKY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while OMVKY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RNFTF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs STOHF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while STOHF trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs LUKOY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PUTRY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while PUTRY trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PETFF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while PETFF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PUTRF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while PUTRF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs GLPEY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while GLPEY trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PSKOF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while PSKOF trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OMVJF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while OMVJF trades at $53.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs REPYY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while REPYY trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs REPYF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while REPYF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs GLPEF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while GLPEF trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OGFGF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while OGFGF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OGFGY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while OGFGY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs MGYOY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while MGYOY trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OAOFY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SLTQY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs HLPMF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while HLPMF trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs ISRMF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while ISRMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RTEXF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs WDGJY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 343.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs UNTC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 249.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while UNTC trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs WDGJF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while WDGJF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PXPEF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SEGYY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs ECTM Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while ECTM trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OKMN Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while OKMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs UNTCW Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while UNTCW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs GRGUF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs POGS Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 814.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while POGS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs TRNX Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs AEDC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 102.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs BNXR Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 41.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs FRMC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 34.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PEMC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SNVP Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RRRI Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PGAS Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs AMNE Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs NUSPQ Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SNPTY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs VCOGF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OJSCY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SGTZY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs POGWY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 46.8B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $15.89, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.06, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.