Eni S.p.A.
Eni S.p.A. EIPAF Peers
See (EIPAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIPAF | $16.39 | +0.18% | 48.2B | 18.21 | $0.90 | +5.03% |
| PCCYF | $0.88 | +1.62% | 226.8B | 6.75 | $0.13 | +31.98% |
| RYDAF | $35.47 | -0.70% | 209.4B | 16.19 | $2.19 | +3.96% |
| TTFNF | $63.25 | -0.96% | 141.2B | 10.59 | $5.97 | +5.56% |
| SNPMF | $0.52 | +0.00% | 91.1B | 8.67 | $0.06 | +36.25% |
| BPAQF | $5.13 | -0.48% | 80B | -73.29 | -$0.07 | +6.15% |
| OMVKY | $13.93 | +0.87% | 72.9B | 14.98 | $0.93 | +9.47% |
| STOHF | $25.77 | +2.20% | 70.5B | 8.16 | $3.16 | +17.79% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| LUKOY | $6.96 | -42.00% | 49B | 0.40 | $17.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EIPAF vs PCCYF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 226.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while PCCYF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RYDAF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 209.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while RYDAF trades at $35.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs TTFNF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while TTFNF trades at $63.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SNPMF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while SNPMF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs BPAQF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while BPAQF trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is -73.29. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OMVKY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while OMVKY trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs STOHF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while STOHF trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RNFTF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs LUKOY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs GLPEY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while GLPEY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PSKOF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while PSKOF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PETFF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while PETFF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PUTRY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while PUTRY trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PUTRF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while PUTRF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OMVJF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while OMVJF trades at $54.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs REPYF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while REPYF trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs REPYY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while REPYY trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs GLPEF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while GLPEF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OGFGY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while OGFGY trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OGFGF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while OGFGF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs MGYOY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while MGYOY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OAOFY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SLTQY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs HLPMF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while HLPMF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 38.70. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs ISRMF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RTEXF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs WDGJY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 343.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs WDGJF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 268.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while WDGJF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs UNTC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 264M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while UNTC trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PXPEF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SEGYY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs ECTM Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while ECTM trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OKMN Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while OKMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs GRGUF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs UNTCW Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while UNTCW trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs POGS Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 790.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while POGS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs AEDC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs TRNX Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PEMC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SNVP Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs FRMC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PGAS Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs BNXR Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs AMNE Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs NUSPQ Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RRRI Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs VCOGF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SNPTY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs POGWY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OJSCY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SGTZY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 48.2B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.39, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.