Evoke plc
Evoke plc EIHDF Peers
See (EIHDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIHDF | $0.90 | +23.29% | 403.3M | -1.55 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| PDYPY | $103.75 | +0.50% | 36.7B | -494.05 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| PDYPF | $205.00 | +1.98% | 36.3B | -476.74 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| ARLUF | $46.19 | +0.00% | 28.8B | 40.17 | $1.15 | +1.20% |
| GXYYY | $23.82 | +0.08% | 20.9B | 18.70 | $1.28 | +2.69% |
| SCHYF | $2.43 | +0.00% | 19.7B | 18.69 | $0.13 | +10.29% |
| SCHYY | $23.66 | +0.34% | 19.1B | 18.33 | $1.29 | +1.16% |
| GXYEF | $4.37 | +0.00% | 19.1B | 17.48 | $0.25 | +2.94% |
| EVVTY | $88.27 | +1.94% | 17.9B | 12.97 | $6.80 | +3.31% |
| EVGGF | $87.40 | -1.99% | 17.8B | 12.87 | $6.79 | +3.58% |
Stock Comparison
EIHDF vs PDYPY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, PDYPY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while PDYPY trades at $103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas PDYPY's P/E ratio is -494.05. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to PDYPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to PDYPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs PDYPF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, PDYPF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while PDYPF trades at $205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas PDYPF's P/E ratio is -476.74. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to PDYPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to PDYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs ARLUF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, ARLUF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while ARLUF trades at $46.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas ARLUF's P/E ratio is 40.17. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ARLUF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and ARLUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs GXYYY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GXYYY has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GXYYY trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GXYYY's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GXYYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GXYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs SCHYF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, SCHYF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while SCHYF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas SCHYF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SCHYF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and SCHYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs SCHYY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, SCHYY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while SCHYY trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas SCHYY's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SCHYY's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to SCHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs GXYEF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GXYEF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GXYEF trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GXYEF's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GXYEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GXYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs EVVTY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, EVVTY has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while EVVTY trades at $88.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas EVVTY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to EVVTY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to EVVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs EVGGF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, EVGGF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while EVGGF trades at $87.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas EVGGF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to EVGGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to EVGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs GMVHF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GMVHF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GMVHF trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GMVHF's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GMVHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GMVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs GMVHY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GMVHY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GMVHY trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GMVHY's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GMVHY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GMVHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs GRKZF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GRKZF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GRKZF trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GRKZF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GRKZF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GRKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs GOFPY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GOFPY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GOFPY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GOFPY's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GOFPY's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GOFPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs LTRCF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, LTRCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while LTRCF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas LTRCF's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to LTRCF's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to LTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs GIGNY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GIGNY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GIGNY trades at $28.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GIGNY's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GIGNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and GIGNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs GIGNF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GIGNF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GIGNF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GIGNF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GIGNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GIGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs MCHVF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, MCHVF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while MCHVF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas MCHVF's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to MCHVF's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and MCHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs LFDJF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, LFDJF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while LFDJF trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas LFDJF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to LFDJF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and LFDJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs PYTCY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, PYTCY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while PYTCY trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas PYTCY's P/E ratio is 81.82. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to PYTCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to PYTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs WYNMF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, WYNMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while WYNMF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas WYNMF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to WYNMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and WYNMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs WYNMY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, WYNMY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while WYNMY trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas WYNMY's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to WYNMY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to WYNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs SKXJF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, SKXJF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while SKXJF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas SKXJF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SKXJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and SKXJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs BMRMF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, BMRMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while BMRMF trades at $121.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas BMRMF's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BMRMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and BMRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs GEBHY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GEBHY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GEBHY trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GEBHY's P/E ratio is 40.94. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GEBHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GEBHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs GEBEY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GEBEY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GEBEY trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GEBEY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GEBEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GEBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs GEBHF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GEBHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GEBHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GEBHF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GEBHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and GEBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs GMALY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GMALY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GMALY trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GMALY's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GMALY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GMALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs KNDGF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, KNDGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while KNDGF trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas KNDGF's P/E ratio is 49.04. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to KNDGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and KNDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs GMALF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GMALF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GMALF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GMALF's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GMALF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GMALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs NGCRF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, NGCRF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while NGCRF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas NGCRF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to NGCRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to NGCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs SJMHF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, SJMHF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while SJMHF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas SJMHF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SJMHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to SJMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs SJMHY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, SJMHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while SJMHY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas SJMHY's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SJMHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and SJMHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs NGCRY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, NGCRY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while NGCRY trades at $27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas NGCRY's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to NGCRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to NGCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs BLBRF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, BLBRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while BLBRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas BLBRF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BLBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and BLBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs MDEVF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, MDEVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while MDEVF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas MDEVF's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to MDEVF's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to MDEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs PYTCF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, PYTCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while PYTCF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas PYTCF's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to PYTCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to PYTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs BVHBB Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, BVHBB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while BVHBB trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas BVHBB's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BVHBB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and BVHBB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs TABCF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, TABCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while TABCF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas TABCF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to TABCF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to TABCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs TACBY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, TACBY has a market cap of 972.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while TACBY trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas TACBY's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to TACBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and TACBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs MDEVY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, MDEVY has a market cap of 929.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while MDEVY trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas MDEVY's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to MDEVY's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and MDEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs BJSAF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, BJSAF has a market cap of 806.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while BJSAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas BJSAF's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BJSAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to BJSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs IRLTY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, IRLTY has a market cap of 784.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while IRLTY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas IRLTY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to IRLTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and IRLTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs RANKF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, RANKF has a market cap of 733.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while RANKF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas RANKF's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to RANKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to RANKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs IRLTF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and IRLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs MCHVY Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, MCHVY has a market cap of 565.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while MCHVY trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas MCHVY's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to MCHVY's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to MCHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs SKYZF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, SKYZF has a market cap of 441M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while SKYZF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas SKYZF's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SKYZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to SKYZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs PBKOF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, PBKOF has a market cap of 437.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while PBKOF trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas PBKOF's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to PBKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and PBKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs KMBIF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, KMBIF has a market cap of 408.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while KMBIF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas KMBIF's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to KMBIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to KMBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs BYNEF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, BYNEF has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while BYNEF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas BYNEF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BYNEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and BYNEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs PDSSF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, PDSSF has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while PDSSF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas PDSSF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to PDSSF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to PDSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs PBTHF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, PBTHF has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while PBTHF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas PBTHF's P/E ratio is -16.45. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to PBTHF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to PBTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs AGTEF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, AGTEF has a market cap of 264.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while AGTEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas AGTEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to AGTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to AGTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs EHGRF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, EHGRF has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while EHGRF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas EHGRF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to EHGRF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to EHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs AINSF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, AINSF has a market cap of 208.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while AINSF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas AINSF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to AINSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to AINSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs GHIFF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GHIFF has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GHIFF trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GHIFF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GHIFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and GHIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs PSDMF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, PSDMF has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while PSDMF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas PSDMF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to PSDMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to PSDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs MALDF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, MALDF has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while MALDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas MALDF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to MALDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and MALDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs PMKRF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, PMKRF has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while PMKRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas PMKRF's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to PMKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and PMKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs RCTUF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, RCTUF has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while RCTUF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas RCTUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to RCTUF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and RCTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs ARHN Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, ARHN has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while ARHN trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas ARHN's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ARHN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and ARHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs GLXZ Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GLXZ has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GLXZ trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GLXZ's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GLXZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GLXZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs CTTMF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, CTTMF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while CTTMF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas CTTMF's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to CTTMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and CTTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs TBTC Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, TBTC has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while TBTC trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas TBTC's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to TBTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to TBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs JPOTF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, JPOTF has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while JPOTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas JPOTF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to JPOTF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to JPOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs BRRE Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, BRRE has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while BRRE trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas BRRE's P/E ratio is -780.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BRRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and BRRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs JKPTF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, JKPTF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while JKPTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas JKPTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to JKPTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and JKPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs TNTAF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, TNTAF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while TNTAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas TNTAF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to TNTAF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to TNTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs SPOZF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, SPOZF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while SPOZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas SPOZF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SPOZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to SPOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs NWGIW Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, NWGIW has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while NWGIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas NWGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to NWGIW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and NWGIW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs CETMF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, CETMF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while CETMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas CETMF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to CETMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and CETMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs RYWCF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, RYWCF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while RYWCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas RYWCF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to RYWCF's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to RYWCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs RVLCF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, RVLCF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while RVLCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas RVLCF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to RVLCF's ROE of +3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to RVLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs LTFD Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, LTFD has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while LTFD trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas LTFD's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to LTFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and LTFD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs BRVO Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, BRVO has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while BRVO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas BRVO's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BRVO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and BRVO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs ITMZF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, ITMZF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while ITMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas ITMZF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ITMZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to ITMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs THRSF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, THRSF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while THRSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas THRSF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to THRSF's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to THRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs FCNE Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, FCNE has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while FCNE trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas FCNE's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to FCNE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to FCNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs RVRVF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, RVRVF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while RVRVF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas RVRVF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to RVRVF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and RVRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs ELRA Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, ELRA has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while ELRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas ELRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ELRA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to ELRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs GMER Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, GMER has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while GMER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas GMER's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GMER's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to GMER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs WPFH Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, WPFH has a market cap of 243.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while WPFH trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas WPFH's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to WPFH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to WPFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs WNRS Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, WNRS has a market cap of 240.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while WNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas WNRS's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to WNRS's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and WNRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs FUNFF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, FUNFF has a market cap of 143.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while FUNFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas FUNFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to FUNFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to FUNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs VETIF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, VETIF has a market cap of 102.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while VETIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas VETIF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to VETIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to VETIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs EXPH Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, EXPH has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while EXPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas EXPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to EXPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to EXPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs SWCC Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, SWCC has a market cap of 75.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while SWCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas SWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SWCC's ROE of +6.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to SWCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs EMBR Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, EMBR has a market cap of 32.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while EMBR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas EMBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to EMBR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and EMBR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs EPGG Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, EPGG has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while EPGG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas EPGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to EPGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and EPGG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs LUKEF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, LUKEF has a market cap of 25K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while LUKEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas LUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to LUKEF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to LUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs NTGL Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, NTGL has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while NTGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas NTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to NTGL's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and NTGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs ELYS Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, ELYS has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while ELYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas ELYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ELYS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and ELYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs KNBA Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, KNBA has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while KNBA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas KNBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to KNBA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF is less volatile compared to KNBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIHDF.
EIHDF vs CGAM Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, CGAM has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while CGAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas CGAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to CGAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and CGAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs ROBK Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, ROBK has a market cap of 612. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while ROBK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas ROBK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ROBK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and ROBK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs LTTGF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, LTTGF has a market cap of 128. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while LTTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas LTTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to LTTGF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and LTTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs AMRA Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, AMRA has a market cap of 32. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while AMRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas AMRA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to AMRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and AMRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs ULSP Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, ULSP has a market cap of 11. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while ULSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas ULSP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ULSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and ULSP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs MLCOF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, MLCOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while MLCOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas MLCOF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to MLCOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and MLCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EIHDF vs EVGEF Comparison
EIHDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIHDF stands at 403.3M. In comparison, EVGEF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIHDF is priced at $0.90, while EVGEF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIHDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.55, whereas EVGEF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, EIHDF's ROE is +2.23%, compared to EVGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIHDF and EVGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).