Société de la Tour Eiffel

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, GFC.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while GFC.PA trades at €85.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas GFC.PA's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GFC.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is more volatile compared to GFC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check GFC.PA's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, FLY.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while FLY.PA trades at €76.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas FLY.PA's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FLY.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is less volatile compared to FLY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check FLY.PA's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, NSI.AS has a market cap of 408.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while NSI.AS trades at €21.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas NSI.AS's P/E ratio is 194.09. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NSI.AS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is more volatile compared to NSI.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check NSI.AS's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, INEA.PA has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while INEA.PA trades at €34.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas INEA.PA's P/E ratio is 75.22. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INEA.PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is more volatile compared to INEA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check INEA.PA's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, VTR.PA has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while VTR.PA trades at €5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas VTR.PA's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VTR.PA's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is more volatile compared to VTR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check VTR.PA's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, MLMAB.PA has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while MLMAB.PA trades at €280.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas MLMAB.PA's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MLMAB.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is more volatile compared to MLMAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check MLMAB.PA's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, ACAN.PA has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while ACAN.PA trades at €0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas ACAN.PA's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ACAN.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is more volatile compared to ACAN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check ACAN.PA's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, MHM.PA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while MHM.PA trades at €0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas MHM.PA's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MHM.PA's ROE of +2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is less volatile compared to MHM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check MHM.PA's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, LEAS.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while LEAS.BR trades at €72.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas LEAS.BR's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LEAS.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is less volatile compared to LEAS.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check LEAS.BR's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, BEFB.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while BEFB.BR trades at €46.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas BEFB.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BEFB.BR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is less volatile compared to BEFB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check BEFB.BR's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, FPN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while FPN.PA trades at €0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas FPN.PA's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FPN.PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is less volatile compared to FPN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check FPN.PA's competition here

EIFF.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EIFF.PA stands at 645.8M. In comparison, HBRN.IR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIFF.PA is priced at €4.86, while HBRN.IR trades at €1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EIFF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas HBRN.IR's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, EIFF.PA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HBRN.IR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EIFF.PA is more volatile compared to HBRN.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIFF.PA.Check HBRN.IR's competition here