iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF
iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EDMW.DE Peers
See (EDMW.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDMW.DE | €8.55 | +0.81% | 3.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €345.24 | -0.77% | 2.9T | 16.30 | €21.18 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €299.01 | -0.77% | 2.5T | 16.30 | €18.34 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | €278.11 | -0.68% | 2.3T | 13.88 | €20.04 | N/A |
| FRCJ.DE | €23.34 | +2.35% | 821.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.04% |
| BBN1.F | €129.40 | +2.26% | 158.5B | 44.87 | €2.87 | +2.81% |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +0.60% |
| ZPDW.DE | €74.55 | +2.39% | 116B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| U1FB.DE | €24.19 | +2.74% | 107.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXR8.DE | €562.48 | +0.74% | 101.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EDMW.DE vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €345.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €299.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €278.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs FRCJ.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FRCJ.DE has a market cap of 821.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while FRCJ.DE trades at €23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRCJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRCJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE and FRCJ.DE have similar daily volatility (0.47).
EDMW.DE vs BBN1.F Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 158.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while BBN1.F trades at €129.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 44.87. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs BLQA.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs ZPDW.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 116B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while ZPDW.DE trades at €74.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs U1FB.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while U1FB.DE trades at €24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs SXR8.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while SXR8.DE trades at €562.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EUNL.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EUNL.DE trades at €100.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs VUAA.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while VUAA.DE trades at €100.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs VUSA.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while VUSA.DE trades at €99.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs SXRZ.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while SXRZ.DE trades at €241.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XJSE.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XJSE.DE trades at €7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs VGWL.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while VGWL.DE trades at €127.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs E500.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while E500.DE trades at €47.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs P500.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while P500.DE trades at €1,046.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs D500.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while D500.DE trades at €48.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs VWCE.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while VWCE.DE trades at €130.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs VGWL.F Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs A4S.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs SPPE.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,046.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs AW1Q.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while AW1Q.DE trades at €17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IS3N.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IS3N.DE trades at €33.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IBC3.F Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs SPY5.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while SPY5.DE trades at €526.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IBC3.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs PPFB.SG Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while PPFB.SG trades at €54.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XDWL.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XDWL.DE trades at €92.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs LYP2.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while LYP2.DE trades at €305.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XDWD.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XDWD.DE trades at €109.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs 6TVM.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while 6TVM.DE trades at €54.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs LYPS.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while LYPS.DE trades at €54.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs TR1.DU Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while TR1.DU trades at €82.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IUSA.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IUSA.DE trades at €52.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs SXRV.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,104.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IUSZ.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IUSQ.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IUSQ.DE trades at €83.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs JUHE.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while JUHE.DE trades at €49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EQQQ.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EQQQ.DE trades at €471.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs SPPW.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while SPPW.DE trades at €36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EUN5.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EUN5.DE trades at €121.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs SGAS.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while SGAS.DE trades at €10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs JRUD.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while JRUD.DE trades at €48.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs QDVE.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while QDVE.DE trades at €30.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs JREU.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while JREU.DE trades at €52.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XDEE.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs DWS.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while DWS.DE trades at €50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EUNK.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EUNK.DE trades at €85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XDEW.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XDEW.DE trades at €84.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs OM3L.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XD9E.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XD9E.DE trades at €125.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EGV2.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EGV2.DE trades at €101.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €34.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €34.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XD9U.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XD9U.DE trades at €154.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE and XD9U.DE have similar daily volatility (0.47).
EDMW.DE vs XD9D.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XD9D.DE trades at €20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XS5E.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs LYYA.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while LYYA.DE trades at €342.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs D5BM.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while D5BM.DE trades at €105.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs STXH.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while STXH.DE trades at €140.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IQQY.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IQQY.DE trades at €34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs LYP6.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while LYP6.DE trades at €260.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EXS1.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EXS1.DE trades at €199.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EXIC.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EXIC.DE trades at €7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €63.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EXW1.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EXW1.DE trades at €54.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EXIE.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EXSA.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EXSA.DE trades at €54.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XWEH.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XWEH.DE trades at €43.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs DBXW.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while DBXW.DE trades at €107.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs VGVF.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while VGVF.DE trades at €102.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs VGVE.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while VGVE.DE trades at €98.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IQQW.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IQQW.DE trades at €72.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XZMU.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XZMU.DE trades at €57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs DBXE.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EDMU.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EDMU.DE trades at €9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs VGWD.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while VGWD.DE trades at €63.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs 2B7K.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs LCUW.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs EXIC.F Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs H4ZF.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while H4ZF.DE trades at €53.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €53.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs IBCF.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while IBCF.DE trades at €128.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs DBXD.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while DBXD.DE trades at €225.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs DECR.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DECR.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while DECR.DE trades at €47.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DECR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DECR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to DECR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs TCC4.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while TCC4.DE trades at €224.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XMME.F Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XMME.F trades at €46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs DBXU.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while DBXU.DE trades at €173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XZW0.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XZW0.DE trades at €39.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs SPP1.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while SPP1.DE trades at €21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs H1D5.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while H1D5.DE trades at €148.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs AUM5.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AUM5.DE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while AUM5.DE trades at €104.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUM5.DE's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUM5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to AUM5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs AEMD.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AEMD.DE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while AEMD.DE trades at €52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEMD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEMD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to AEMD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XIEE.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XIEE.DE trades at €77.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs XMME.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while XMME.DE trades at €55.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.
EDMW.DE vs QDV5.DE Comparison
EDMW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDMW.DE stands at 3.9B. In comparison, QDV5.DE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDMW.DE is priced at €8.55, while QDV5.DE trades at €8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDMW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDV5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDMW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDV5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDMW.DE is more volatile compared to QDV5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDMW.DE.