ECA Marcellus Trust I
ECA Marcellus Trust I (ECTM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ECTM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECTM | $0.53 | -1.67% | 9.3M | 5.30 | $0.10 | +18.15% |
| PCCYF | $0.98 | +1.09% | 220.2B | 7.52 | $0.13 | +6.70% |
| RYDAF | $35.95 | -1.24% | 209.9B | 16.05 | $2.24 | +3.90% |
| TTFNF | $64.77 | +1.60% | 142.7B | 11.73 | $5.52 | +5.43% |
| SNPMF | $0.57 | +5.56% | 93.5B | 14.25 | $0.04 | +6.99% |
| BPAQF | $5.74 | +5.71% | 88.7B | 143.38 | $0.04 | +5.65% |
| OMVKY | $14.37 | +2.35% | 75.2B | 19.42 | $0.74 | +9.18% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| STOHF | $25.13 | +1.13% | 63.7B | 8.32 | $3.02 | +9.15% |
| EIPAF | $18.71 | -1.53% | 55.1B | 21.76 | $0.86 | +4.40% |
Stock Comparison
ECTM vs PCCYF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 220.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while PCCYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check PCCYF's competition here
ECTM vs RYDAF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 209.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while RYDAF trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check RYDAF's competition here
ECTM vs TTFNF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while TTFNF trades at $64.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check TTFNF's competition here
ECTM vs SNPMF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while SNPMF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check SNPMF's competition here
ECTM vs BPAQF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while BPAQF trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is 143.38. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check BPAQF's competition here
ECTM vs OMVKY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while OMVKY trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check OMVKY's competition here
ECTM vs RNFTF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check RNFTF's competition here
ECTM vs STOHF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while STOHF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check STOHF's competition here
ECTM vs EIPAF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while EIPAF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check EIPAF's competition here
ECTM vs LUKOY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check LUKOY's competition here
ECTM vs PETFF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while PETFF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check PETFF's competition here
ECTM vs GLPEY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while GLPEY trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check GLPEY's competition here
ECTM vs PUTRY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while PUTRY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check PUTRY's competition here
ECTM vs PUTRF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while PUTRF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check PUTRF's competition here
ECTM vs PSKOF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while PSKOF trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check PSKOF's competition here
ECTM vs REPYY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while REPYY trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check REPYY's competition here
ECTM vs REPYF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while REPYF trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check REPYF's competition here
ECTM vs OMVJF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while OMVJF trades at $54.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check OMVJF's competition here
ECTM vs OGFGY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while OGFGY trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check OGFGY's competition here
ECTM vs GLPEF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while GLPEF trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check GLPEF's competition here
ECTM vs OGFGF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while OGFGF trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check OGFGF's competition here
ECTM vs MGYOY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while MGYOY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check MGYOY's competition here
ECTM vs OAOFY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check OAOFY's competition here
ECTM vs SLTQY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check SLTQY's competition here
ECTM vs HLPMF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while HLPMF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check HLPMF's competition here
ECTM vs ISRMF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check ISRMF's competition here
ECTM vs RTEXF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check RTEXF's competition here
ECTM vs WDGJY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check WDGJY's competition here
ECTM vs UNTC Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 286M. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while UNTC trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check UNTC's competition here
ECTM vs WDGJF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while WDGJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check WDGJF's competition here
ECTM vs PXPEF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check PXPEF's competition here
ECTM vs SEGYY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check SEGYY's competition here
ECTM vs UNTCW Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while UNTCW trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check UNTCW's competition here
ECTM vs OKMN Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while OKMN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check OKMN's competition here
ECTM vs GRGUF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check GRGUF's competition here
ECTM vs POGS Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 847.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while POGS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check POGS's competition here
ECTM vs AEDC Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check AEDC's competition here
ECTM vs TRNX Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check TRNX's competition here
ECTM vs PEMC Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 29K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check PEMC's competition here
ECTM vs SNVP Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check SNVP's competition here
ECTM vs FRMC Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check FRMC's competition here
ECTM vs PGAS Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check PGAS's competition here
ECTM vs BNXR Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check BNXR's competition here
ECTM vs AMNE Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check AMNE's competition here
ECTM vs NUSPQ Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check NUSPQ's competition here
ECTM vs RRRI Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check RRRI's competition here
ECTM vs OJSCY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check OJSCY's competition here
ECTM vs VCOGF Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check VCOGF's competition here
ECTM vs POGWY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check POGWY's competition here
ECTM vs SNPTY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check SNPTY's competition here
ECTM vs SGTZY Comparison August 2025
ECTM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECTM stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ECTM is priced at $0.53, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECTM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, ECTM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECTM is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECTM.Check SGTZY's competition here