ECN Capital Corp.
ECN Capital Corp. ECN.TO Peers
See (ECN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECN.TO | $3.01 | -0.33% | 846.24M | 75.25 | $0.04 | +1.87% |
| VISA.NE | $33.46 | +0.87% | 960.06B | 35.22 | $0.95 | +0.88% |
| MA.NE | $36.01 | +1.72% | 734.43B | 40.01 | $0.90 | +0.50% |
| PYPL.NE | $5.33 | +2.70% | 97.87B | 16.15 | $0.33 | N/A |
| GSY.TO | $145.51 | +1.41% | 2.36B | 8.93 | $16.30 | +3.43% |
| PRL.TO | $33.25 | +3.36% | 1.29B | 19.67 | $1.69 | +1.76% |
| ECN-PC.TO | $21.00 | +0.48% | 853.11M | 4.16 | $5.05 | +1.87% |
| ACD.TO | $3.49 | +10.79% | 29.87M | -9.43 | -$0.37 | N/A |
| CHW.TO | $0.90 | N/A | 16.66M | -0.44 | -$2.05 | N/A |
| MRBL.CN | $0.06 | +9.09% | 11.04M | -3.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ECN.TO vs VISA.NE Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, VISA.NE has a market cap of 960.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while VISA.NE trades at $33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas VISA.NE's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VISA.NE's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is more volatile compared to VISA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs MA.NE Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, MA.NE has a market cap of 734.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while MA.NE trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas MA.NE's P/E ratio is 40.01. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MA.NE's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is more volatile compared to MA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs PYPL.NE Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, PYPL.NE has a market cap of 97.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while PYPL.NE trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas PYPL.NE's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PYPL.NE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is more volatile compared to PYPL.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs GSY.TO Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, GSY.TO has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while GSY.TO trades at $145.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas GSY.TO's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSY.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is less volatile compared to GSY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs PRL.TO Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, PRL.TO has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while PRL.TO trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas PRL.TO's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRL.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is less volatile compared to PRL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs ECN-PC.TO Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, ECN-PC.TO has a market cap of 853.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while ECN-PC.TO trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas ECN-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ECN-PC.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is more volatile compared to ECN-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs ACD.TO Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, ACD.TO has a market cap of 29.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while ACD.TO trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas ACD.TO's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACD.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is less volatile compared to ACD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs CHW.TO Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, CHW.TO has a market cap of 16.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while CHW.TO trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas CHW.TO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHW.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is less volatile compared to CHW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs MRBL.CN Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, MRBL.CN has a market cap of 11.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while MRBL.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas MRBL.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRBL.CN's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is more volatile compared to MRBL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs INVR.CN Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, INVR.CN has a market cap of 9.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while INVR.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas INVR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INVR.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is less volatile compared to INVR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs CRWN.TO Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, CRWN.TO has a market cap of 5.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while CRWN.TO trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas CRWN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRWN.TO's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is more volatile compared to CRWN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs XSF.CN Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, XSF.CN has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while XSF.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas XSF.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XSF.CN's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is more volatile compared to XSF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs GWS.CN Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, GWS.CN has a market cap of 2.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while GWS.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas GWS.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GWS.CN's ROE of +2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is more volatile compared to GWS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs PDFI.CN Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, PDFI.CN has a market cap of 1.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while PDFI.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas PDFI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PDFI.CN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is less volatile compared to PDFI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.
ECN.TO vs AXIS.TO Comparison
ECN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECN.TO stands at 846.24M. In comparison, AXIS.TO has a market cap of 606870.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECN.TO is priced at $3.01, while AXIS.TO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 75.25, whereas AXIS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ECN.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AXIS.TO's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ECN.TO is more volatile compared to AXIS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECN.TO.