Encision Inc.

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SRTOY has a market cap of 199.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SRTOY trades at $20.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SRTOY's P/E ratio is 75.98. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SRTOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to SRTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SRTOY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ESLOF has a market cap of 137.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while ESLOF trades at $298.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas ESLOF's P/E ratio is 49.79. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ESLOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to ESLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check ESLOF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ESLOY has a market cap of 136.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while ESLOY trades at $147.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas ESLOY's P/E ratio is 49.58. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ESLOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to ESLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check ESLOY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MECNY has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while MECNY trades at $88.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas MECNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MECNY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to MECNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check MECNY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SOAGY has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SOAGY trades at $42.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SOAGY's P/E ratio is 120.06. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SOAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SOAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SOAGY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RSMDF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while RSMDF trades at $24.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas RSMDF's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RSMDF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to RSMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check RSMDF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HOCPF has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while HOCPF trades at $119.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas HOCPF's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HOCPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to HOCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check HOCPF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HOCPY has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while HOCPY trades at $116.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas HOCPY's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HOCPY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to HOCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check HOCPY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TRUMF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while TRUMF trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas TRUMF's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TRUMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to TRUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check TRUMF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TRUMY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while TRUMY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas TRUMY's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TRUMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to TRUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check TRUMY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CLPBY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while CLPBY trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas CLPBY's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CLPBY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to CLPBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check CLPBY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CLPBF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while CLPBF trades at $92.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas CLPBF's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CLPBF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to CLPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check CLPBF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SAUHF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SAUHF trades at $124.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SAUHF's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SAUHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SAUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SAUHF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SDMHF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SDMHF trades at $199.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SDMHF's P/E ratio is 74.25. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SDMHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SDMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SDMHF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SAUHY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SAUHY trades at $12.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SAUHY's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SAUHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to SAUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SAUHY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SARTF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SARTF trades at $184.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SARTF's P/E ratio is 106.51. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SARTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to SARTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SARTF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SSSGY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SSSGY trades at $42.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SSSGY's P/E ratio is 121.46. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SSSGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SSSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SSSGY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, OCPNF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while OCPNF trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas OCPNF's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OCPNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to OCPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check OCPNF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SUVPF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SUVPF trades at $210.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SUVPF's P/E ratio is 120.85. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SUVPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SUVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SUVPF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FSPKF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while FSPKF trades at $20.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas FSPKF's P/E ratio is 52.66. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FSPKF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to FSPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check FSPKF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SSMXY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SSMXY trades at $16.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SSMXY's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SSMXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SSMXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SSMXY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SSMXF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SSMXF trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SSMXF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SSMXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SSMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SSMXF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, YPHDF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while YPHDF trades at $535.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas YPHDF's P/E ratio is 67.14. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to YPHDF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to YPHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check YPHDF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CNVVF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while CNVVF trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas CNVVF's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CNVVF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to CNVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check CNVVF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CNVVY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while CNVVY trades at $12.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas CNVVY's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CNVVY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to CNVVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check CNVVY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FLMNY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while FLMNY trades at $12.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas FLMNY's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FLMNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to FLMNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check FLMNY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FLMNF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while FLMNF trades at $61.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas FLMNF's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FLMNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to FLMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check FLMNF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ADDLF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while ADDLF trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas ADDLF's P/E ratio is 61.76. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADDLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to ADDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check ADDLF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CZMWF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while CZMWF trades at $56.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas CZMWF's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CZMWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to CZMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check CZMWF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CZMWY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while CZMWY trades at $53.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas CZMWY's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CZMWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to CZMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check CZMWY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AHICF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while AHICF trades at $16.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas AHICF's P/E ratio is 59.89. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AHICF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to AHICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check AHICF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SHWGF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SHWGF trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SHWGF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SHWGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to SHWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SHWGF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ANSLY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while ANSLY trades at $79.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas ANSLY's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ANSLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to ANSLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check ANSLY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TCHBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while TCHBF trades at $211.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas TCHBF's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TCHBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to TCHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check TCHBF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ANSLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while ANSLF trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas ANSLF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ANSLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to ANSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check ANSLF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TCGGY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while TCGGY trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas TCGGY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TCGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to TCGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check TCGGY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BOEUF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while BOEUF trades at $33.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas BOEUF's P/E ratio is 147.41. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BOEUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to BOEUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check BOEUF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EKTAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while EKTAF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas EKTAF's P/E ratio is 83.33. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EKTAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to EKTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check EKTAF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EKTAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while EKTAY trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas EKTAY's P/E ratio is 68.26. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EKTAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to EKTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check EKTAY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GRRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while GRRMF trades at $46.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas GRRMF's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GRRMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to GRRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check GRRMF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NPRRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while NPRRF trades at $8.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas NPRRF's P/E ratio is 43.32. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NPRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to NPRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check NPRRF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TDVXF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while TDVXF trades at $12.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas TDVXF's P/E ratio is 84.33. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TDVXF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to TDVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check TDVXF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TGLVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while TGLVY trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas TGLVY's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TGLVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to TGLVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check TGLVY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BITGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while BITGF trades at $15.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas BITGF's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to BITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check BITGF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PBHDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while PBHDF trades at $19.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas PBHDF's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PBHDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to PBHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check PBHDF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SHWGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SHWGY trades at $3.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SHWGY's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SHWGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SHWGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SHWGY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NNCSF has a market cap of 743.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while NNCSF trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas NNCSF's P/E ratio is 81.67. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NNCSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to NNCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check NNCSF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, KSRBF has a market cap of 686.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while KSRBF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas KSRBF's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KSRBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to KSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check KSRBF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, JNDOF has a market cap of 531M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while JNDOF trades at $22.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas JNDOF's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JNDOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to JNDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check JNDOF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HGYMF has a market cap of 524.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while HGYMF trades at $24.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas HGYMF's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HGYMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to HGYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check HGYMF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SAFLF has a market cap of 520.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SAFLF trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SAFLF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SAFLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to SAFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SAFLF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SAFLY has a market cap of 515.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SAFLY trades at $2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SAFLY's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SAFLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SAFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SAFLY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SPMXF has a market cap of 458.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SPMXF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SPMXF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SPMXF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to SPMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SPMXF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CLHLF has a market cap of 365.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while CLHLF trades at $61.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas CLHLF's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CLHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to CLHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check CLHLF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GUERF has a market cap of 281M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while GUERF trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas GUERF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GUERF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to GUERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check GUERF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TSNLF has a market cap of 252.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while TSNLF trades at $5.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas TSNLF's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TSNLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to TSNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check TSNLF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, OPSSF has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while OPSSF trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas OPSSF's P/E ratio is -26.74. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OPSSF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to OPSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check OPSSF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EEOIF has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while EEOIF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas EEOIF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EEOIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to EEOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check EEOIF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, UEEC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while UEEC trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas UEEC's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UEEC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to UEEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check UEEC's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GVDI has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while GVDI trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas GVDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GVDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to GVDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check GVDI's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, OTCFF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while OTCFF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas OTCFF's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OTCFF's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to OTCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check OTCFF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TEVNF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while TEVNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas TEVNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TEVNF's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to TEVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check TEVNF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RSCF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while RSCF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas RSCF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RSCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to RSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check RSCF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, IMTH has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while IMTH trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas IMTH's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IMTH's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to IMTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check IMTH's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BLMHF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while BLMHF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas BLMHF's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BLMHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to BLMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check BLMHF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TUTH has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while TUTH trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas TUTH's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TUTH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to TUTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check TUTH's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, YBGJ has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while YBGJ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas YBGJ's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to YBGJ's ROE of +3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to YBGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check YBGJ's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PXMVF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while PXMVF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas PXMVF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PXMVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to PXMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check PXMVF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CBSC has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while CBSC trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas CBSC's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CBSC's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to CBSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check CBSC's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MCDA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while MCDA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas MCDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MCDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to MCDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check MCDA's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NSTGQ has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while NSTGQ trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas NSTGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NSTGQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to NSTGQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check NSTGQ's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, OJSY has a market cap of 454.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while OJSY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas OJSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OJSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to OJSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check OJSY's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PDMI has a market cap of 324.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while PDMI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas PDMI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PDMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to PDMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check PDMI's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, REMI has a market cap of 200K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while REMI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas REMI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to REMI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to REMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check REMI's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, WHSI has a market cap of 182.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while WHSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas WHSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WHSI's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to WHSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check WHSI's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BLFE has a market cap of 156.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while BLFE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas BLFE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BLFE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to BLFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check BLFE's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CEOS has a market cap of 119K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while CEOS trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas CEOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CEOS's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to CEOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check CEOS's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, QTXB has a market cap of 118K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while QTXB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas QTXB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QTXB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to QTXB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check QTXB's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SDCCQ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SDCCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SDCCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SDCCQ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SDCCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SDCCQ's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GMVDF has a market cap of 26K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while GMVDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas GMVDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GMVDF's ROE of +3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to GMVDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check GMVDF's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ASFX has a market cap of 17.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while ASFX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas ASFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to ASFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check ASFX's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, INND has a market cap of 14.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while INND trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas INND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INND's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to INND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check INND's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MDIT has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while MDIT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas MDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MDIT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to MDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check MDIT's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LANZ has a market cap of 4.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while LANZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas LANZ's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LANZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to LANZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check LANZ's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, DGEN has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while DGEN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas DGEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DGEN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to DGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check DGEN's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SVSO has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SVSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SVSO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SVSO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SVSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SVSO's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LFPI has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while LFPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas LFPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LFPI's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to LFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check LFPI's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SEYE has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SEYE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SEYE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SEYE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SEYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SEYE's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BGMD has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while BGMD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas BGMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BGMD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to BGMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check BGMD's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ADLI has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while ADLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas ADLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADLI's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to ADLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check ADLI's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VSMD has a market cap of 801. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while VSMD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas VSMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VSMD's ROE of +3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is less volatile compared to VSMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check VSMD's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HRAL has a market cap of 396. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while HRAL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas HRAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HRAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to HRAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check HRAL's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MICRD has a market cap of 317. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while MICRD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas MICRD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MICRD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to MICRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check MICRD's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RGBOQ has a market cap of 97. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while RGBOQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas RGBOQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RGBOQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to RGBOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check RGBOQ's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SECI has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while SECI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas SECI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SECI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to SECI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check SECI's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VTEQ has a market cap of 1. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while VTEQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas VTEQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VTEQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to VTEQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check VTEQ's competition here

ECIA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECIA stands at 4.1M. In comparison, OCPNY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ECIA is priced at $0.35, while OCPNY trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECIA currently has a P/E ratio of -17.35, whereas OCPNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECIA's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OCPNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ECIA is more volatile compared to OCPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECIA.Check OCPNY's competition here