Enigma-Bulwark, Limited
Enigma-Bulwark, Limited EBWK Peers
See (EBWK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBWK | $0.00 | +0.00% | 13.7K | N/A | -$0.02 | N/A |
| ASAZY | $15.31 | -0.46% | 33.8B | 22.51 | $0.68 | +1.84% |
| ASAZF | $30.14 | +0.00% | 33.5B | 22.00 | $1.37 | +1.84% |
| SOMLF | $38.19 | +0.00% | 15.9B | 23.01 | $1.66 | +1.73% |
| SOMLY | $8.95 | +0.11% | 14.8B | 21.30 | $0.42 | +1.02% |
| SCTBF | $15.35 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 15.66 | $0.98 | +2.63% |
| SCTBY | $14.82 | +0.00% | 8.1B | 14.82 | $1.00 | +2.70% |
| LOIMF | $39.51 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 16.00 | $2.47 | +3.65% |
| SOHGF | $5.31 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 17.70 | $0.30 | N/A |
| MRLWF | $6.03 | -0.17% | 473.5M | -201.00 | -$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EBWK vs ASAZY Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while ASAZY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs ASAZF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while ASAZF trades at $30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs SOMLF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while SOMLF trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to SOMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs SOMLY Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while SOMLY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs SCTBF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while SCTBF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to SCTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs SCTBY Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while SCTBY trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to SCTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs LOIMF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to LOIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs SOHGF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs MRLWF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 473.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while MRLWF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is -201.00. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to MRLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs CRFQF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs ICTSF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while ICTSF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is -36.36. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs RSKIA Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while RSKIA trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to RSKIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs WPNNF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs GKPRF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while GKPRF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -66.70. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs SECUF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while SECUF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is -179.69. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SECUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to SECUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs PRBCF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs LDDFF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while LDDFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs CSTI Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs VOTDF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs DADTF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to DADTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs PLRTF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs DIGTF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while DIGTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs IWAL Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while IWAL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs PTEFF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while PTEFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs SSECF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to SSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs MACE Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs ARGL Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to ARGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs VCON Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs DRNG Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 522.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs ATWT Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 507.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while ATWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to ATWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs DTII Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 448.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while DTII trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs WCCP Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 396.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while WCCP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs LGTT Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while LGTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGTT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to LGTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs BLPG Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 346.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while BLPG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs VSYS Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is less volatile compared to VSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs PSGI Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to PSGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs SCTY Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to SCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs MGNT Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is less volatile compared to MGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs GDSI Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to GDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs HCGS Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs MIHL Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while MIHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to MIHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs ABPR Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABPR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to ABPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs WOAM Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while WOAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WOAM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK and WOAM have similar daily volatility (196.04).
EBWK vs PERL Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK and PERL have similar daily volatility (196.04).
EBWK vs ALXXF Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while ALXXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to ALXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs EKCS Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs SKVY Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKVY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to SKVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs HWSY Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWSY's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK and HWSY have similar daily volatility (196.04).
EBWK vs CVAS Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while CVAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVAS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is less volatile compared to CVAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs DIRV Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to DIRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs PWLK Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, PWLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while PWLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK and PWLK have similar daily volatility (196.04).
EBWK vs HLCN Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, HLCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while HLCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to HLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs VSYM Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, VSYM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while VSYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to VSYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.
EBWK vs GTKP Comparison
EBWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBWK stands at 13.7K. In comparison, GTKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EBWK is priced at $0.00, while GTKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBWK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EBWK is more volatile compared to GTKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBWK.