Enbridge Inc. CUM RED PREF Series B
Enbridge Inc. CUM RED PREF Series B EBRGF Peers
See (EBRGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBRGF | $12.60 | +0.80% | 101.6B | N/A | N/A | +12.20% |
EBBNF | $23.00 | +0.88% | 101.6B | 10.37 | $2.22 | +6.42% |
ENBGF | $17.00 | +2.44% | 99.4B | N/A | N/A | +9.56% |
ENNPF | $15.69 | -5.02% | 96.2B | N/A | N/A | +10.03% |
TCANF | $5.39 | -36.59% | 52.6B | 2.12 | $2.54 | +8.87% |
EBGEF | $23.91 | N/A | 52.1B | 10.78 | $2.22 | +9.59% |
TNCAF | $11.35 | -1.39% | 51.8B | 4.47 | $2.54 | +13.01% |
EBBGF | $23.54 | +0.38% | 51.3B | 10.61 | $2.22 | +7.15% |
MPLXP | $33.38 | -0.01% | 34.1B | 11.29 | $2.96 | +7.25% |
EBRZF | $15.00 | +17.19% | 32.7B | N/A | N/A | +10.65% |
Stock Comparison
EBRGF vs EBBNF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, EBBNF has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while EBBNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBBNF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBBNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to EBBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs ENBGF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ENBGF has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while ENBGF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENBGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENBGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and ENBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs ENNPF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ENNPF has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while ENNPF trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENNPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENNPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and ENNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs TCANF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, TCANF has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while TCANF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCANF's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCANF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and TCANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs EBGEF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, EBGEF has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while EBGEF trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBGEF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBGEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and EBGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs TNCAF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, TNCAF has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while TNCAF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNCAF's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNCAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to TNCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs EBBGF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, EBBGF has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while EBBGF trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBBGF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBBGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to EBBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs MPLXP Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and MPLXP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs EBRZF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, EBRZF has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while EBRZF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBRZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and EBRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs ENBRF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ENBRF has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while ENBRF trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to ENBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs PMBPF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, PMBPF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while PMBPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMBPF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMBPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to PMBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs PMMBF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, PMMBF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while PMMBF trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMMBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMMBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and PMMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs SOCGM Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SOCGM has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while SOCGM trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOCGM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOCGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and SOCGM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs PPLAF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, PPLAF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while PPLAF trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPLAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPLAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to PPLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs PBNAF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, PBNAF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while PBNAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBNAF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBNAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and PBNAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs KEYUF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, KEYUF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while KEYUF trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEYUF's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEYUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and KEYUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs EQTNP Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, EQTNP has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while EQTNP trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQTNP's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQTNP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to EQTNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs FRVWY Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FRVWY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while FRVWY trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRVWY's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRVWY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and FRVWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs VOPKY Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VOPKY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while VOPKY trades at $44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOPKY's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VOPKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to VOPKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs VOPKF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VOPKF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while VOPKF trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOPKF's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VOPKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and VOPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs TPZEF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, TPZEF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while TPZEF trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPZEF's P/E ratio is 71.31. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPZEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to TPZEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs GBNXF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, GBNXF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while GBNXF trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBNXF's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBNXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to GBNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs SOCGP Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SOCGP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while SOCGP trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOCGP's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOCGP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and SOCGP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs SPKOY Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SPKOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while SPKOY trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKOY's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPKOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and SPKOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs FDVWF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FDVWF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while FDVWF trades at $65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDVWF's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDVWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and FDVWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs SNPKF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SNPKF has a market cap of 945.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while SNPKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNPKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and SNPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs OGSRW Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, OGSRW has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while OGSRW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGSRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGSRW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to OGSRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs TWMIF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, TWMIF has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while TWMIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWMIF's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to TWMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs AVACF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AVACF has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while AVACF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVACF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVACF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to AVACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs TTNN Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, TTNN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while TTNN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTNN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTNN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to TTNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs MRGE Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MRGE has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while MRGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRGE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRGE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and MRGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs CWPE Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, CWPE has a market cap of 763.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while CWPE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CWPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to CWPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs GMLPF Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, GMLPF has a market cap of 95.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while GMLPF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GMLPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and GMLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBRGF vs LOGL Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, LOGL has a market cap of 94.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while LOGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to LOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs FLST Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FLST has a market cap of 400. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while FLST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLST's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF is less volatile compared to FLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBRGF.
EBRGF vs TIDE Comparison
EBRGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBRGF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, TIDE has a market cap of 250. Regarding current trading prices, EBRGF is priced at $12.60, while TIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBRGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EBRGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIDE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EBRGF and TIDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).