Aifinyo AG
Aifinyo AG (EBEN.HM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EBEN.HM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBEN.HM | €1.61 | -2.42% | 6.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 3V64.DE | €259.95 | +0.76% | 506.6B | 28.04 | €9.27 | +0.83% |
| M4I.DE | €428.30 | +0.25% | 379.1B | 29.76 | €14.39 | +0.63% |
| AEC1.DE | €259.40 | -1.05% | 178.1B | 19.33 | €13.42 | +1.13% |
| 2PP.F | €39.05 | +0.83% | 36B | 8.31 | €4.71 | +0.62% |
| 2PP.DE | €39.05 | +1.57% | 35.9B | 8.29 | €4.71 | +0.62% |
| SFE.DE | €58.97 | -0.17% | 21.4B | 7.32 | €8.08 | +1.76% |
| KRTA.F | €0.75 | -0.67% | 1.9B | 9.31 | €0.08 | +4.70% |
| GLJ.DE | €12.56 | -2.18% | 554.9M | 9.74 | €1.29 | +3.18% |
| HYQ.DE | €75.70 | +4.56% | 506.8M | 19.56 | €3.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EBEN.HM vs 3V64.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, 3V64.DE has a market cap of 506.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while 3V64.DE trades at €259.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3V64.DE's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 3V64.DE's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to 3V64.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check 3V64.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs M4I.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, M4I.DE has a market cap of 379.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while M4I.DE trades at €428.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas M4I.DE's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to M4I.DE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to M4I.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check M4I.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs AEC1.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, AEC1.DE has a market cap of 178.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while AEC1.DE trades at €259.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AEC1.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to AEC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check AEC1.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs 2PP.F Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, 2PP.F has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while 2PP.F trades at €39.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2PP.F's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 2PP.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to 2PP.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check 2PP.F's competition here
EBEN.HM vs 2PP.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, 2PP.DE has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while 2PP.DE trades at €39.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2PP.DE's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 2PP.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to 2PP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check 2PP.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs SFE.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, SFE.DE has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while SFE.DE trades at €58.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFE.DE's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SFE.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to SFE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check SFE.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs KRTA.F Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, KRTA.F has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while KRTA.F trades at €0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRTA.F's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KRTA.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is more volatile compared to KRTA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check KRTA.F's competition here
EBEN.HM vs GLJ.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, GLJ.DE has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while GLJ.DE trades at €12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLJ.DE's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GLJ.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to GLJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check GLJ.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs HYQ.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, HYQ.DE has a market cap of 506.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while HYQ.DE trades at €75.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYQ.DE's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HYQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to HYQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check HYQ.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs FRU.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, FRU.DE has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while FRU.DE trades at €6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRU.DE's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FRU.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to FRU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check FRU.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs ALG.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ALG.DE has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while ALG.DE trades at €2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALG.DE's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALG.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to ALG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check ALG.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs EBE.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, EBE.DE has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while EBE.DE trades at €9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBE.DE's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EBE.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to EBE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check EBE.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs FRS.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, FRS.DE has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while FRS.DE trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRS.DE's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FRS.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is more volatile compared to FRS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check FRS.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs TUF.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, TUF.DE has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while TUF.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUF.DE's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TUF.DE's ROE of -6.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is more volatile compared to TUF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check TUF.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs TUF.F Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, TUF.F has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while TUF.F trades at €0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUF.F's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TUF.F's ROE of -6.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is more volatile compared to TUF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check TUF.F's competition here
EBEN.HM vs FF24.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, FF24.DE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while FF24.DE trades at €0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FF24.DE's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FF24.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EBEN.HM has daily volatility of 0.62 and FF24.DE has daily volatility of N/A.Check FF24.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs CSQ.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CSQ.DE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while CSQ.DE trades at €2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSQ.DE's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CSQ.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is more volatile compared to CSQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check CSQ.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs FF24.F Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, FF24.F has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while FF24.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FF24.F's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FF24.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to FF24.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check FF24.F's competition here
EBEN.HM vs ENGL.DE Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ENGL.DE has a market cap of 493.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while ENGL.DE trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGL.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ENGL.DE's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is more volatile compared to ENGL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check ENGL.DE's competition here
EBEN.HM vs ENGL.F Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ENGL.F has a market cap of 219.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while ENGL.F trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGL.F's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ENGL.F's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is less volatile compared to ENGL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check ENGL.F's competition here
EBEN.HM vs CSQ.F Comparison April 2026
EBEN.HM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBEN.HM stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CSQ.F has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, EBEN.HM is priced at €1.61, while CSQ.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBEN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSQ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBEN.HM's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CSQ.F's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EBEN.HM is more volatile compared to CSQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBEN.HM.Check CSQ.F's competition here