AmRest Holdings SE

EAT.MC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EAT.MC stands at 813.4M. In comparison, ELIOR.PA has a market cap of 661.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT.MC is priced at €3.80, while ELIOR.PA trades at €2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EAT.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 94.00, whereas ELIOR.PA's P/E ratio is 261.40. In terms of profitability, EAT.MC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELIOR.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT.MC is more volatile compared to ELIOR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.MC.

EAT.MC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EAT.MC stands at 813.4M. In comparison, IBS.LS has a market cap of 399.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT.MC is priced at €3.80, while IBS.LS trades at €9.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EAT.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 94.00, whereas IBS.LS's P/E ratio is 51.37. In terms of profitability, EAT.MC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBS.LS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT.MC is more volatile compared to IBS.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.MC.

EAT.MC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EAT.MC stands at 813.4M. In comparison, ALDBL.PA has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT.MC is priced at €3.80, while ALDBL.PA trades at €3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EAT.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 94.00, whereas ALDBL.PA's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, EAT.MC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALDBL.PA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT.MC is more volatile compared to ALDBL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.MC.

EAT.MC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EAT.MC stands at 813.4M. In comparison, FLO.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT.MC is priced at €3.80, while FLO.PA trades at €21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EAT.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 94.00, whereas FLO.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT.MC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLO.PA's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT.MC is more volatile compared to FLO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.MC.

EAT.MC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EAT.MC stands at 813.4M. In comparison, MLTBM.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT.MC is priced at €3.80, while MLTBM.PA trades at €3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EAT.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 94.00, whereas MLTBM.PA's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, EAT.MC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLTBM.PA's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT.MC is more volatile compared to MLTBM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.MC.