Airbus SE
Airbus SE EADSF Peers
See (EADSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EADSF | $208.50 | +0.00% | 160.6B | 31.15 | $6.55 | +1.63% |
| EADSY | $52.37 | +0.00% | 160.6B | 31.67 | $1.61 | +1.63% |
| SAFRY | $81.67 | +0.00% | 131.7B | -166.94 | -$0.47 | +1.00% |
| SAFRF | $327.74 | +0.00% | 131.2B | -171.07 | -$1.84 | +0.94% |
| RYCEY | $13.38 | +0.00% | 110.5B | 32.67 | $0.40 | +0.57% |
| RYCEF | $13.21 | +0.00% | 109.5B | 32.39 | $0.40 | +0.60% |
| RLLCF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 93.4B | 0.31 | $0.02 | N/A |
| RNMBF | $2,100.01 | +0.00% | 93.4B | 95.97 | $21.36 | +0.39% |
| RNMBY | $422.49 | +0.00% | 90.9B | 95.21 | $4.28 | +0.43% |
| BAESY | $105.07 | +0.00% | 76.1B | 29.41 | $3.52 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
EADSF vs EADSY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, EADSY has a market cap of 160.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while EADSY trades at $52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas EADSY's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EADSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to EADSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SAFRY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SAFRY has a market cap of 131.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SAFRY trades at $81.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SAFRY's P/E ratio is -166.94. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAFRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to SAFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SAFRF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SAFRF has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SAFRF trades at $327.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SAFRF's P/E ratio is -171.07. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAFRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to SAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs RYCEY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, RYCEY has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while RYCEY trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas RYCEY's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RYCEY's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to RYCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs RYCEF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, RYCEF has a market cap of 109.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while RYCEF trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas RYCEF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RYCEF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to RYCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs RLLCF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, RLLCF has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while RLLCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas RLLCF's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RLLCF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to RLLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs RNMBF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, RNMBF has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while RNMBF trades at $2,100.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas RNMBF's P/E ratio is 95.97. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RNMBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to RNMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs RNMBY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, RNMBY has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while RNMBY trades at $422.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas RNMBY's P/E ratio is 95.21. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RNMBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to RNMBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs BAESY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, BAESY has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while BAESY trades at $105.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas BAESY's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BAESY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to BAESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs BAESF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, BAESF has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while BAESF trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas BAESF's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BAESF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to BAESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs FINMY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, FINMY has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while FINMY trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas FINMY's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FINMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to FINMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs THLEF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, THLEF has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while THLEF trades at $291.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas THLEF's P/E ratio is 49.48. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THLEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to THLEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs THLLY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, THLLY has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while THLLY trades at $58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas THLLY's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THLLY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to THLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs FINMF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, FINMF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while FINMF trades at $57.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas FINMF's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FINMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to FINMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SAABY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SAABY has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SAABY trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SAABY's P/E ratio is 56.43. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAABY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to SAABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs DUAVF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, DUAVF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while DUAVF trades at $353.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas DUAVF's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DUAVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to DUAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SAABF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SAABF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SAABF trades at $55.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SAABF's P/E ratio is 56.99. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAABF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to SAABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs MTUAF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, MTUAF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while MTUAF trades at $449.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas MTUAF's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MTUAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to MTUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs MTUAY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, MTUAY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while MTUAY trades at $223.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas MTUAY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MTUAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to MTUAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SGGKF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SGGKF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SGGKF trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SGGKF's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGGKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to SGGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SGGKY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SGGKY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SGGKY trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SGGKY's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGGKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to SGGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs HAGHY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, HAGHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while HAGHY trades at $57.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas HAGHY's P/E ratio is 118.13. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HAGHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to HAGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs HNSDF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, HNSDF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while HNSDF trades at $115.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas HNSDF's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HNSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to HNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs BDRAF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, BDRAF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while BDRAF trades at $84.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas BDRAF's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BDRAF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to BDRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs BDRBF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, BDRBF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while BDRBF trades at $87.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas BDRBF's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BDRBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to BDRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs YSHLF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, YSHLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while YSHLF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas YSHLF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YSHLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to YSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs BOMBF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, BOMBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while BOMBF trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas BOMBF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BOMBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to BOMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs BDRXF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, BDRXF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while BDRXF trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas BDRXF's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BDRXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to BDRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs NSKFF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, NSKFF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while NSKFF trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas NSKFF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NSKFF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to NSKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs BDRPF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, BDRPF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while BDRPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas BDRPF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BDRPF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to BDRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs ACLLY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, ACLLY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while ACLLY trades at $70.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas ACLLY's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACLLY's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to ACLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs FNCNF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, FNCNF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while FNCNF trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas FNCNF's P/E ratio is 97.13. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FNCNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to FNCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SMBMY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SMBMY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SMBMY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SMBMY's P/E ratio is 47.28. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMBMY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to SMBMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs ACLIF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, ACLIF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while ACLIF trades at $60.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas ACLIF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACLIF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to ACLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SMBMF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SMBMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SMBMF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SMBMF's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMBMF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to SMBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs AVIJF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, AVIJF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while AVIJF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas AVIJF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVIJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to AVIJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs QNTQY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, QNTQY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while QNTQY trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas QNTQY's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QNTQY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to QNTQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs QNTQF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, QNTQF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while QNTQF trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas QNTQF's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QNTQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to QNTQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs MDALF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, MDALF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while MDALF trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas MDALF's P/E ratio is 45.26. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MDALF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to MDALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs CMGMF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, CMGMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while CMGMF trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas CMGMF's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CMGMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to CMGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs CMGMY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, CMGMY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while CMGMY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas CMGMY's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CMGMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to CMGMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs AUTLF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, AUTLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while AUTLF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas AUTLF's P/E ratio is 83.60. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to AUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs LSIIF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, LSIIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while LSIIF trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas LSIIF's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LSIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to LSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs GGRGF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, GGRGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while GGRGF trades at $72.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas GGRGF's P/E ratio is -300.46. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GGRGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to GGRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs CZGZF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, CZGZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while CZGZF trades at $34.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas CZGZF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CZGZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to CZGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs ATROB Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, ATROB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while ATROB trades at $32.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas ATROB's P/E ratio is -297.29. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATROB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to ATROB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs MIESY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, MIESY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while MIESY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas MIESY's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MIESY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to MIESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs MALJF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, MALJF has a market cap of 814.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while MALJF trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas MALJF's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MALJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to MALJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs AVNBF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, AVNBF has a market cap of 773.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while AVNBF trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas AVNBF's P/E ratio is 124.05. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVNBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to AVNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs HERXF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, HERXF has a market cap of 736.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while HERXF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas HERXF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HERXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to HERXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SNIRF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SNIRF has a market cap of 698.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SNIRF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SNIRF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNIRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to SNIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs MIESF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, MIESF has a market cap of 698.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while MIESF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas MIESF's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MIESF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to MIESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs ASTGY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, ASTGY has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while ASTGY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas ASTGY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASTGY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to ASTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs AERG Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, AERG has a market cap of 471.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while AERG trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas AERG's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AERG's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to AERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs JMCCF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, JMCCF has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while JMCCF trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas JMCCF's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JMCCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to JMCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs EOPSF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, EOPSF has a market cap of 370.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while EOPSF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas EOPSF's P/E ratio is -14.78. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EOPSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to EOPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs FTGFF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, FTGFF has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while FTGFF trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas FTGFF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FTGFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to FTGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs NORSF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, NORSF has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while NORSF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas NORSF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NORSF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to NORSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs BUKS Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, BUKS has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while BUKS trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas BUKS's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BUKS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to BUKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SAFS Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SAFS has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SAFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to SAFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs CNRD Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, CNRD has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while CNRD trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas CNRD's P/E ratio is 361.00. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to CNRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs ACCMF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, ACCMF has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while ACCMF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas ACCMF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACCMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to ACCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs TIPGF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, TIPGF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while TIPGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas TIPGF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TIPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to TIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs VLTTF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, VLTTF has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while VLTTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas VLTTF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLTTF's ROE of -7.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to VLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs STTLF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, STTLF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while STTLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas STTLF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to STTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs NRPI Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, NRPI has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while NRPI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas NRPI's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NRPI's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to NRPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs QCKSF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, QCKSF has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while QCKSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas QCKSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QCKSF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to QCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs MAXQF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, MAXQF has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while MAXQF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas MAXQF's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAXQF's ROE of +8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to MAXQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs OPST Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, OPST has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while OPST trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas OPST's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to OPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs ETCC Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, ETCC has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while ETCC trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas ETCC's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ETCC's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to ETCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs AKRRF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, AKRRF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while AKRRF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas AKRRF's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AKRRF's ROE of +14.67%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to AKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs TIKK Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, TIKK has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while TIKK trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas TIKK's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TIKK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to TIKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SNAVF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SNAVF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SNAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SNAVF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNAVF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to SNAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs NEXD Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, NEXD has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while NEXD trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas NEXD's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NEXD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to NEXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs FLYLF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, FLYLF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while FLYLF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas FLYLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLYLF's ROE of +7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to FLYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs XERI Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, XERI has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while XERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas XERI's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XERI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is less volatile compared to XERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs USDR Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, USDR has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while USDR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas USDR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to USDR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to USDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs MSNVF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, MSNVF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while MSNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas MSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSNVF's ROE of -20.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to MSNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs DEWY Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, DEWY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while DEWY trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas DEWY's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DEWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to DEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs LLLI Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, LLLI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while LLLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas LLLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LLLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to LLLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs HWKE Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, HWKE has a market cap of 959.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while HWKE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas HWKE's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HWKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to HWKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs PMEA Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, PMEA has a market cap of 752.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while PMEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas PMEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PMEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to PMEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs MDEX Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, MDEX has a market cap of 320.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while MDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas MDEX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MDEX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to MDEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs DLRWF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, DLRWF has a market cap of 272.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while DLRWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas DLRWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DLRWF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EADSF has daily volatility of 1.26 and DLRWF has daily volatility of N/A.
EADSF vs PSSR Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, PSSR has a market cap of 154.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while PSSR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas PSSR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PSSR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to PSSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs RNWR Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, RNWR has a market cap of 139.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while RNWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas RNWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RNWR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to RNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs CFFMF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, CFFMF has a market cap of 118.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while CFFMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas CFFMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CFFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to CFFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs DSUS Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, DSUS has a market cap of 114.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while DSUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas DSUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DSUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to DSUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs OBTEF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, OBTEF has a market cap of 82.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while OBTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas OBTEF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OBTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to OBTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs UITA Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, UITA has a market cap of 38.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while UITA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas UITA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UITA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to UITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs ASAV Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, ASAV has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while ASAV trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas ASAV's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASAV's ROE of +7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to ASAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs LNGT Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, LNGT has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while LNGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas LNGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LNGT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to LNGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs ADFS Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, ADFS has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while ADFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas ADFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADFS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to ADFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs SDSS Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, SDSS has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while SDSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas SDSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SDSS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to SDSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs EPEO Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, EPEO has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while EPEO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas EPEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EPEO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to EPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs BANT Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, BANT has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while BANT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas BANT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BANT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to BANT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs BRSI Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, BRSI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while BRSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas BRSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BRSI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to BRSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs HSFI Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, HSFI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while HSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas HSFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HSFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to HSFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.
EADSF vs RDEGF Comparison
EADSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EADSF stands at 160.6B. In comparison, RDEGF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, EADSF is priced at $208.50, while RDEGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EADSF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.15, whereas RDEGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EADSF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RDEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EADSF is more volatile compared to RDEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EADSF.