Easterly Acquisition Corp. Units
Easterly Acquisition Corp. Units (EACQU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EACQU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Reinsurance Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EACQU | $10.78 | +0.00% | 2.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RE | $351.28 | +2.93% | 15.3B | 20.75 | $16.93 | +1.88% |
| RGA | $198.82 | -2.66% | 13.1B | 11.24 | $17.69 | +1.84% |
| EG | $317.93 | -1.84% | 12.8B | 8.41 | $37.80 | +2.51% |
| RNR | $292.21 | -1.26% | 12.7B | 5.22 | $56.04 | +0.55% |
| RZB | $25.00 | +0.20% | 12.6B | 4.10 | $6.09 | +5.75% |
| BNRE | $47.12 | -0.80% | 6.9B | 4.90 | $9.61 | +0.64% |
| BNRE-A | $50.01 | +1.38% | 6.9B | 5.20 | $9.61 | +0.64% |
| RNR-PF | $20.94 | -0.24% | 6.5B | -5.36 | -$3.90 | +0.55% |
| HG | $28.61 | -2.09% | 2.9B | 5.16 | $5.55 | +6.96% |
Stock Comparison
EACQU vs RE Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RE has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while RE trades at $351.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RE's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to RE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check RE's competition here
EACQU vs RGA Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RGA has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while RGA trades at $198.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGA's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RGA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to RGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check RGA's competition here
EACQU vs EG Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EG has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while EG trades at $317.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EG's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to EG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check EG's competition here
EACQU vs RNR Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RNR has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while RNR trades at $292.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNR's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to RNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check RNR's competition here
EACQU vs RZB Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RZB has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while RZB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RZB's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RZB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to RZB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check RZB's competition here
EACQU vs BNRE Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BNRE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while BNRE trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNRE's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to BNRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check BNRE's competition here
EACQU vs BNRE-A Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BNRE-A has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while BNRE-A trades at $50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNRE-A's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNRE-A's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to BNRE-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check BNRE-A's competition here
EACQU vs RNR-PF Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RNR-PF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while RNR-PF trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNR-PF's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNR-PF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to RNR-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check RNR-PF's competition here
EACQU vs HG Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while HG trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HG's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to HG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check HG's competition here
EACQU vs SPNT Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SPNT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while SPNT trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPNT's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPNT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to SPNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check SPNT's competition here
EACQU vs EACQ Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EACQ has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while EACQ trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EACQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EACQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to EACQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check EACQ's competition here
EACQU vs SPNT-PB Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SPNT-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while SPNT-PB trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPNT-PB's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPNT-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to SPNT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check SPNT-PB's competition here
EACQU vs BAMR Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BAMR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while BAMR trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMR's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to BAMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check BAMR's competition here
EACQU vs RNR-PG Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RNR-PG has a market cap of 707.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while RNR-PG trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNR-PG's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNR-PG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to RNR-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check RNR-PG's competition here
EACQU vs GLRE Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GLRE has a market cap of 571.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while GLRE trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLRE's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to GLRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check GLRE's competition here
EACQU vs MHLD Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MHLD has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while MHLD trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHLD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MHLD's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to MHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check MHLD's competition here
EACQU vs KG Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KG has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while KG trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KG's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to KG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check KG's competition here
EACQU vs PRE-PJ Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PRE-PJ has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while PRE-PJ trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRE-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRE-PJ's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to PRE-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check PRE-PJ's competition here
EACQU vs OXBR Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, OXBR has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while OXBR trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OXBR's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OXBR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to OXBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check OXBR's competition here
EACQU vs OXBRW Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, OXBRW has a market cap of 820.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while OXBRW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OXBRW's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OXBRW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to OXBRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check OXBRW's competition here
EACQU vs MH-PC Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while MH-PC trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MH-PC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to MH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check MH-PC's competition here
EACQU vs RZA Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while RZA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to RZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check RZA's competition here
EACQU vs RNR-PE Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RNR-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while RNR-PE trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNR-PE's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNR-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to RNR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check RNR-PE's competition here
EACQU vs MH-PD Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MH-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while MH-PD trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MH-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MH-PD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to MH-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check MH-PD's competition here
EACQU vs MH-PA Comparison April 2026
EACQU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EACQU stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MH-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EACQU is priced at $10.78, while MH-PA trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EACQU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MH-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EACQU's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MH-PA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EACQU is less volatile compared to MH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EACQU.Check MH-PA's competition here