Duke Energy Corporation 5.625%

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 227.95B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 137.66B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NEE-PN trades at $22.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 136.95B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NEE trades at $66.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 100.93B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while SOJE trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 100.36B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while SO trades at $91.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 100.16B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while SOJC trades at $21.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 99.37B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while SOJD trades at $19.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 95.39B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while DUK trades at $122.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 93.99B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while DUK-PA trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 79.77B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NEE-PR trades at $38.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.29B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NGGTF trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 70.85B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NGG trades at $72.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 59.75B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AEP trades at $107.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 49.13B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while SREA trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 46.73B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EXC trades at $46.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 46.59B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while D trades at $54.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to D's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 40.98B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while XEL trades at $71.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 39.79B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ED trades at $110.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 39.77B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PEG trades at $79.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 37.43B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PCG trades at $17.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 36.73B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ELC trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ETR trades at $83.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 35.02B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while WEC trades at $109.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 31.89B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ELEZY trades at $15.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 29.10B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ELEZF trades at $27.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 28.57B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while DTE trades at $137.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 28.51B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while DTG trades at $17.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 28.23B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while DTB trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 28.13B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while DTW trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 27.32B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NSARO trades at $76.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 26.86B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AEE trades at $99.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 26.70B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PPL trades at $36.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NSARP trades at $71.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 24.90B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while FE trades at $43.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 24.59B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while FTS trades at $49.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.65B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while DTY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 22.48B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HRNNF trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 21.94B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CMS trades at $73.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 21.89B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CMSA trades at $21.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CLPHY trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CMSD trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 21.74B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ES trades at $59.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 21.68B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CMSC trades at $22.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.58B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CLPHF trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 21.10B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EIX trades at $54.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 19.96B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while TERRF trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.48B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AQNB trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 18.43B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while MAEOY trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.34B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AILIO trades at $67.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 18.01B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while TNABF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 17.77B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EBR-B trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 17.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EBR trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 17.27B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while TNABY trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.50B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CKISF trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.14B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CKISY trades at $32.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 15.93B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EVRG trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 15.70B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while LNT trades at $61.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AGR trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EMRAF trades at $43.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 12.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while KEP trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 11.14B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PNW trades at $93.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.92B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while RDEIY trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ELIAF trades at $92.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while UEPCO trades at $90.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while OGE trades at $45.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while FTRSF trades at $15.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EQUEY trades at $6.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while UEPCN trades at $75.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while UEPEO trades at $74.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.55B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while UEPEP trades at $73.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.09B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while UEPCP trades at $69.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while FORFF trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 6.65B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while TEZNY trades at $29.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while UEPEM trades at $63.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HKVTY trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CMS-PB trades at $75.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while IDA trades at $116.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EGIEY trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.23B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while UEPEN trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PCG-PA trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while IESFY trades at $119.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ENIC trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PCG-PB trades at $19.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CMS-PC trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while TXNM trades at $52.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PCG-PC trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PCG-PE trades at $17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PCG-PD trades at $17.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while POR trades at $42.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PCG-PG trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while DTJ trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while OKLO trades at $28.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -38.78. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PNM trades at $41.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while WELPM trades at $110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while RGPCF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while WELPP trades at $64.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AILLM trades at $78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AILLN trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AILIN trades at $72.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HAWLM trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PGPKY trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AILLP trades at $65.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CEPU trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EDN trades at $30.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ETI-P trades at $22.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 979.77M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EAI trades at $20.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 644.38M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 547.17M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CUPUF trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.63M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while RELFF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.58M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while SPKE trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 424.59M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while GNE trades at $15.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.91M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 312.86M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNLPL trades at $51.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 311.42M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNTHP trades at $51.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.55M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 289.86M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ABTZY trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 261.21M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 261.21M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ABZPY trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.51M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNTHO trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 239.90M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNTHN trades at $39.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 232.29M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HAWEN trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNLHO trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNLHP trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 229.20M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HAWEL trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 217.27M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNLTP trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 208.26M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HAWLN trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 204.68M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while GPJA trades at $22.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNLTN trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNLPM trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 188.36M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNLHN trades at $31.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 185.00M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ENO trades at $21.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 184.50M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNLTL trades at $30.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 178.87M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EMP trades at $20.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 169.97M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ENJ trades at $20.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.70M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 91.15M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while VIASP trades at $24.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.52M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while VIA trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.84M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 22.81M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while SUME trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 4.60M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while MCPB trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EUSP trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 722498.00. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158566.00. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while RIGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47092.00. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while USWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1571.00. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while RENU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RENU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HAWLL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HAWLL trades at $13.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ALP-PQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, CNP-PB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AEPPZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, DTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while DTP trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, IPWLO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to IPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, IPWLG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to IPWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PCGU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PCGU trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, HAWLI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while HAWLI trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, BANGN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while BANGN trades at $98.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to BANGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ENIA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ENIA trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NMPWP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NMPWP trades at $56.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, IPWLN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to IPWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, PNMXO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while PNMXO trades at $74.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, AILIP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while AILIP trades at $66.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, DCUE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while DCUE trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, EVSO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while EVSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NEE-PP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, ENIAY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NEWEN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NEWEN trades at $126.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, IPWLP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to IPWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, IPLDP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.

DUKB plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DUKB stands at 94.51B. In comparison, NEE-PQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUKB is priced at $24.67, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DUKB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUKB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUKB is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUKB.