Defense Technologies International Corp.
Defense Technologies International Corp. DTII Peers
See (DTII) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTII | $0.04 | +232.64% | 1.2M | 3.62 | $0.01 | N/A |
| ASAZY | $17.03 | +2.78% | 37.7B | 25.37 | $0.67 | +1.66% |
| ASAZF | $34.42 | +4.30% | 36.3B | 25.69 | $1.34 | +1.61% |
| SOMLF | $36.00 | +0.00% | 15B | 20.45 | $1.76 | +1.84% |
| SCTBF | $15.00 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 15.46 | $0.97 | +3.85% |
| SCTBY | $14.59 | -5.24% | 8.2B | 15.04 | $0.97 | +2.74% |
| SOMLY | $9.12 | +2.01% | 7.6B | 20.73 | $0.44 | +1.00% |
| LOIMF | $39.51 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 16.00 | $2.47 | +3.65% |
| SOHGF | $5.31 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 17.70 | $0.30 | N/A |
| MRLWF | $5.90 | +0.00% | 463.3M | 84.29 | $0.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DTII vs ASAZY Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while ASAZY trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs ASAZF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while ASAZF trades at $34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs SOMLF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while SOMLF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to SOMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs SCTBF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while SCTBF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to SCTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs SCTBY Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while SCTBY trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to SCTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs SOMLY Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while SOMLY trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs LOIMF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to LOIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs SOHGF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs MRLWF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 463.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while MRLWF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is 84.29. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to MRLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs CRFQF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs ICTSF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while ICTSF trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs GKPRF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 92.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while GKPRF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -98.25. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs RSKIA Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while RSKIA trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to RSKIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs WPNNF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs SECUF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while SECUF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is -181.00. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SECUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to SECUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs PRBCF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs ALXXF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while ALXXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to ALXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs LDDFF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while LDDFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs CSTI Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs VOTDF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs WCCP Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while WCCP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs DADTF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to DADTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs PLRTF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs DIGTF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while DIGTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs IWAL Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while IWAL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs PTEFF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while PTEFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs SSECF Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to SSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs MACE Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs ARGL Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to ARGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs VCON Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570.4K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs DRNG Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 522.4K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs ATWT Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 480.3K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while ATWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to ATWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs LGTT Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384.2K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while LGTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LGTT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to LGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs BLPG Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 354.8K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while BLPG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs VSYS Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to VSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs PSGI Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to PSGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs SCTY Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112.5K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to SCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs WOAM Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 97K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while WOAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WOAM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to WOAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs GDSI Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95.4K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to GDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs HCGS Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77.2K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs MGNT Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to MGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs ABPR Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ABPR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to ABPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs PERL Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28.3K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to PERL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs EKCS Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 17.4K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs EBWK Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while EBWK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to EBWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs MIHL Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 12.6K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while MIHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to MIHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs SKVY Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SKVY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to SKVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs HWSY Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HWSY's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to HWSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs CVAS Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7.5K. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while CVAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CVAS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to CVAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs DIRV Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to DIRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs HLCN Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HLCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while HLCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to HLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs VSYM Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VSYM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while VSYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to VSYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs PWLK Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PWLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while PWLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is less volatile compared to PWLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.
DTII vs GTKP Comparison
DTII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTII stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GTKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DTII is priced at $0.04, while GTKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTII currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTII's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DTII is more volatile compared to GTKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTII.