Dream Unlimited Corp.
Dream Unlimited Corp. (DRUNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DRUNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRUNF | $15.39 | +1.38% | 626.6M | 11.51 | $1.34 | +3.03% |
| CDVM | $0.00 | +0.00% | 270.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MGAWY | $7.54 | +3.71% | 245.1B | 3.46 | $2.18 | +4.38% |
| SUHJY | $17.26 | +0.00% | 50.8B | 20.64 | $0.85 | +2.51% |
| SUHJF | $15.97 | +0.00% | 46.3B | 18.79 | $0.85 | +3.02% |
| CRBJF | $3.98 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 7.37 | $0.54 | +4.63% |
| CRBJY | $35.73 | +0.00% | 25.5B | 6.47 | $5.52 | +4.97% |
| DWAHF | $38.55 | +0.00% | 23.9B | 12.12 | $3.18 | +2.69% |
| DWAHY | $35.77 | +0.00% | 22.1B | 11.08 | $3.22 | +2.26% |
| CNGKY | $12.45 | +0.00% | 21B | 14.46 | $0.83 | +3.56% |
Stock Comparison
DRUNF vs CDVM Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CDVM has a market cap of 270.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CDVM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CDVM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CDVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CDVM's competition here
DRUNF vs MGAWY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, MGAWY has a market cap of 245.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while MGAWY trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas MGAWY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGAWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to MGAWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check MGAWY's competition here
DRUNF vs SUHJY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SUHJY has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SUHJY trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SUHJY's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUHJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to SUHJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SUHJY's competition here
DRUNF vs SUHJF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SUHJF has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SUHJF trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SUHJF's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUHJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SUHJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SUHJF's competition here
DRUNF vs CRBJF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CRBJF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CRBJF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CRBJF's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRBJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CRBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CRBJF's competition here
DRUNF vs CRBJY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CRBJY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CRBJY trades at $35.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CRBJY's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRBJY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CRBJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CRBJY's competition here
DRUNF vs DWAHF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, DWAHF has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while DWAHF trades at $38.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas DWAHF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DWAHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to DWAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check DWAHF's competition here
DRUNF vs DWAHY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, DWAHY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while DWAHY trades at $35.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas DWAHY's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DWAHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to DWAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check DWAHY's competition here
DRUNF vs CNGKY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CNGKY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CNGKY trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CNGKY's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNGKY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to CNGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CNGKY's competition here
DRUNF vs CAOVY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CAOVY has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CAOVY trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CAOVY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAOVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to CAOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CAOVY's competition here
DRUNF vs CHKGF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CHKGF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CHKGF trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CHKGF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHKGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CHKGF's competition here
DRUNF vs HNGKY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, HNGKY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while HNGKY trades at $42.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas HNGKY's P/E ratio is -56.79. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HNGKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to HNGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check HNGKY's competition here
DRUNF vs HKHGF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, HKHGF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while HKHGF trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas HKHGF's P/E ratio is -56.07. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HKHGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to HKHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check HKHGF's competition here
DRUNF vs CAOVF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CAOVF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CAOVF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CAOVF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAOVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CAOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CAOVF's competition here
DRUNF vs SNLAY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SNLAY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SNLAY trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SNLAY's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNLAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to SNLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SNLAY's competition here
DRUNF vs PDGRY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, PDGRY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while PDGRY trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas PDGRY's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PDGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to PDGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check PDGRY's competition here
DRUNF vs SNLAF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SNLAF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SNLAF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SNLAF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNLAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SNLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SNLAF's competition here
DRUNF vs CTPVF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CTPVF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CTPVF trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CTPVF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTPVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CTPVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CTPVF's competition here
DRUNF vs WARFY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, WARFY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while WARFY trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas WARFY's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WARFY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to WARFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check WARFY's competition here
DRUNF vs DWHHF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, DWHHF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while DWHHF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas DWHHF's P/E ratio is -17.28. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DWHHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to DWHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check DWHHF's competition here
DRUNF vs WARFF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, WARFF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while WARFF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas WARFF's P/E ratio is -23.69. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WARFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to WARFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check WARFF's competition here
DRUNF vs LNGPF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, LNGPF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while LNGPF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas LNGPF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNGPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to LNGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check LNGPF's competition here
DRUNF vs LGFRY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, LGFRY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while LGFRY trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas LGFRY's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to LGFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check LGFRY's competition here
DRUNF vs UOLGY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, UOLGY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while UOLGY trades at $35.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas UOLGY's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UOLGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to UOLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check UOLGY's competition here
DRUNF vs CHVKF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CHVKF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CHVKF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CHVKF's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHVKF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CHVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CHVKF's competition here
DRUNF vs UOLGF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, UOLGF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while UOLGF trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas UOLGF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UOLGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to UOLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check UOLGF's competition here
DRUNF vs CDEVY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CDEVY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CDEVY trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CDEVY's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDEVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to CDEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CDEVY's competition here
DRUNF vs CDEVF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CDEVF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CDEVF trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CDEVF's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDEVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to CDEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CDEVF's competition here
DRUNF vs SCCCF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SCCCF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SCCCF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SCCCF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCCCF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SCCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SCCCF's competition here
DRUNF vs CWQXY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CWQXY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CWQXY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CWQXY's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CWQXY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CWQXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CWQXY's competition here
DRUNF vs CWQXF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CWQXF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CWQXF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CWQXF's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CWQXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CWQXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CWQXF's competition here
DRUNF vs AYAAF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, AYAAF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while AYAAF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas AYAAF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AYAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to AYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check AYAAF's competition here
DRUNF vs DTCWY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, DTCWY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while DTCWY trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas DTCWY's P/E ratio is -17.73. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTCWY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to DTCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check DTCWY's competition here
DRUNF vs SZENF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SZENF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SZENF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SZENF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SZENF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SZENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SZENF's competition here
DRUNF vs KRYPF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, KRYPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while KRYPF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas KRYPF's P/E ratio is 51.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRYPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to KRYPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check KRYPF's competition here
DRUNF vs CTRYY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CTRYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CTRYY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CTRYY's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTRYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CTRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CTRYY's competition here
DRUNF vs KRYPY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, KRYPY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while KRYPY trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas KRYPY's P/E ratio is 47.14. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRYPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to KRYPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check KRYPY's competition here
DRUNF vs GTWCF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, GTWCF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while GTWCF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas GTWCF's P/E ratio is -145.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTWCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to GTWCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check GTWCF's competition here
DRUNF vs CHVKY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CHVKY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CHVKY trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CHVKY's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHVKY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CHVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CHVKY's competition here
DRUNF vs CFFHF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CFFHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CFFHF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CFFHF's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CFFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CFFHF's competition here
DRUNF vs BRKFF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, BRKFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while BRKFF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas BRKFF's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRKFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to BRKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check BRKFF's competition here
DRUNF vs EGRNY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, EGRNY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while EGRNY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas EGRNY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGRNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to EGRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check EGRNY's competition here
DRUNF vs CAIAF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CAIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CAIAF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CAIAF's P/E ratio is 164.71. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAIAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CAIAF's competition here
DRUNF vs SIMEF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SIMEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SIMEF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SIMEF's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIMEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to SIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SIMEF's competition here
DRUNF vs CJNHF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CJNHF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CJNHF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CJNHF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CJNHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CJNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CJNHF's competition here
DRUNF vs SHMAY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SHMAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SHMAY trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SHMAY's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHMAY's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SHMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SHMAY's competition here
DRUNF vs FRSHY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, FRSHY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while FRSHY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas FRSHY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRSHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to FRSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check FRSHY's competition here
DRUNF vs ARLLF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, ARLLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while ARLLF trades at $77.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ARLLF's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to ARLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check ARLLF's competition here
DRUNF vs BSPDY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, BSPDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while BSPDY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas BSPDY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSPDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to BSPDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check BSPDY's competition here
DRUNF vs LDHUF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, LDHUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while LDHUF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas LDHUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LDHUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to LDHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check LDHUF's competition here
DRUNF vs RBLAY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, RBLAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while RBLAY trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas RBLAY's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBLAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to RBLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check RBLAY's competition here
DRUNF vs PHKIF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, PHKIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while PHKIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas PHKIF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PHKIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to PHKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check PHKIF's competition here
DRUNF vs YLDGY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, YLDGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while YLDGY trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas YLDGY's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YLDGY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to YLDGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check YLDGY's competition here
DRUNF vs YLDGF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, YLDGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while YLDGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas YLDGF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YLDGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to YLDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check YLDGF's competition here
DRUNF vs GZUHF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, GZUHF has a market cap of 863M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while GZUHF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas GZUHF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GZUHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to GZUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check GZUHF's competition here
DRUNF vs MGAWF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, MGAWF has a market cap of 847.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while MGAWF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas MGAWF's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGAWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to MGAWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check MGAWF's competition here
DRUNF vs SZNTF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SZNTF has a market cap of 847.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SZNTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SZNTF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SZNTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SZNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SZNTF's competition here
DRUNF vs TIACF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, TIACF has a market cap of 840.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while TIACF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas TIACF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIACF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to TIACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check TIACF's competition here
DRUNF vs AGPYF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, AGPYF has a market cap of 797.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while AGPYF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas AGPYF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGPYF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to AGPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check AGPYF's competition here
DRUNF vs CAOYF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CAOYF has a market cap of 778.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CAOYF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CAOYF's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAOYF's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CAOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CAOYF's competition here
DRUNF vs KWHAF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, KWHAF has a market cap of 756M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while KWHAF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas KWHAF's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KWHAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to KWHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check KWHAF's competition here
DRUNF vs CDCTF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CDCTF has a market cap of 683M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CDCTF trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CDCTF's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDCTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CDCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CDCTF's competition here
DRUNF vs SOLLF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SOLLF has a market cap of 680.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SOLLF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SOLLF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOLLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SOLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SOLLF's competition here
DRUNF vs CTRYF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CTRYF has a market cap of 658.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CTRYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CTRYF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTRYF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CTRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CTRYF's competition here
DRUNF vs LPHHF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, LPHHF has a market cap of 606.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while LPHHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas LPHHF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LPHHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to LPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check LPHHF's competition here
DRUNF vs CCLHF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CCLHF has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CCLHF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CCLHF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCLHF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CCLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CCLHF's competition here
DRUNF vs WFICF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, WFICF has a market cap of 428.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while WFICF trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas WFICF's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WFICF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to WFICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check WFICF's competition here
DRUNF vs MODVF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, MODVF has a market cap of 367.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while MODVF trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas MODVF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MODVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to MODVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check MODVF's competition here
DRUNF vs SIOPF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SIOPF has a market cap of 335.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SIOPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SIOPF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIOPF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SIOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SIOPF's competition here
DRUNF vs AYAAY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, AYAAY has a market cap of 298.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while AYAAY trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas AYAAY's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AYAAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to AYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check AYAAY's competition here
DRUNF vs BEIJF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, BEIJF has a market cap of 271.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while BEIJF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas BEIJF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BEIJF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to BEIJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check BEIJF's competition here
DRUNF vs AGPYY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, AGPYY has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while AGPYY trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas AGPYY's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGPYY's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to AGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check AGPYY's competition here
DRUNF vs FRTCF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, FRTCF has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while FRTCF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas FRTCF's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRTCF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to FRTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check FRTCF's competition here
DRUNF vs GNLAF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, GNLAF has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while GNLAF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas GNLAF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNLAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to GNLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check GNLAF's competition here
DRUNF vs TMPPF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, TMPPF has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while TMPPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas TMPPF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TMPPF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to TMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check TMPPF's competition here
DRUNF vs KWGPF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, KWGPF has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while KWGPF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas KWGPF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KWGPF's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to KWGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check KWGPF's competition here
DRUNF vs DRSLF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, DRSLF has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while DRSLF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas DRSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to DRSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check DRSLF's competition here
DRUNF vs YUZHF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, YUZHF has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while YUZHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas YUZHF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YUZHF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to YUZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check YUZHF's competition here
DRUNF vs FHRT Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, FHRT has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while FHRT trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas FHRT's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to FHRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check FHRT's competition here
DRUNF vs GCCO Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, GCCO has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while GCCO trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas GCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GCCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to GCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check GCCO's competition here
DRUNF vs BAKBF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, BAKBF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while BAKBF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas BAKBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAKBF's ROE of +3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to BAKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check BAKBF's competition here
DRUNF vs SIUDF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SIUDF has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SIUDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SIUDF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIUDF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SIUDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SIUDF's competition here
DRUNF vs KDCCF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, KDCCF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while KDCCF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas KDCCF's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KDCCF's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to KDCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check KDCCF's competition here
DRUNF vs GZUHY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, GZUHY has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while GZUHY trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas GZUHY's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GZUHY's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to GZUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check GZUHY's competition here
DRUNF vs ILAL Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, ILAL has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while ILAL trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ILAL's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILAL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to ILAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check ILAL's competition here
DRUNF vs SOLLY Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SOLLY has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SOLLY trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SOLLY's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOLLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SOLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SOLLY's competition here
DRUNF vs SRRE Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, SRRE has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while SRRE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SRRE's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRRE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to SRRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check SRRE's competition here
DRUNF vs TKCM Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, TKCM has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while TKCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas TKCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKCM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to TKCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check TKCM's competition here
DRUNF vs HIHI Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, HIHI has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while HIHI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas HIHI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HIHI's ROE of +3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to HIHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check HIHI's competition here
DRUNF vs URBDF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, URBDF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while URBDF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas URBDF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to URBDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to URBDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check URBDF's competition here
DRUNF vs GRLT Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, GRLT has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while GRLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas GRLT's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRLT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is less volatile compared to GRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check GRLT's competition here
DRUNF vs UCASU Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, UCASU has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while UCASU trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas UCASU's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UCASU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to UCASU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check UCASU's competition here
DRUNF vs RGSG Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, RGSG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while RGSG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas RGSG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGSG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to RGSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check RGSG's competition here
DRUNF vs EGRNF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, EGRNF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while EGRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas EGRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGRNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to EGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check EGRNF's competition here
DRUNF vs YTRGF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, YTRGF has a market cap of 799.6K. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while YTRGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas YTRGF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YTRGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to YTRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check YTRGF's competition here
DRUNF vs FLLLF Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, FLLLF has a market cap of 379K. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while FLLLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas FLLLF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLLLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to FLLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check FLLLF's competition here
DRUNF vs XTRM Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, XTRM has a market cap of 333.8K. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while XTRM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas XTRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XTRM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to XTRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check XTRM's competition here
DRUNF vs CHIT Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, CHIT has a market cap of 188.3K. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while CHIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas CHIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHIT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to CHIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check CHIT's competition here
DRUNF vs GLCO Comparison February 2026
DRUNF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRUNF stands at 626.6M. In comparison, GLCO has a market cap of 47.8K. Regarding current trading prices, DRUNF is priced at $15.39, while GLCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRUNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas GLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRUNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRUNF is more volatile compared to GLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRUNF.Check GLCO's competition here