DKSH Holding AG
DKSH Holding AG DKSHF Peers
See (DKSHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKSHF | $66.87 | N/A | 4.34B | 19.78 | $3.38 | +3.97% |
| EXPGY | $51.60 | +1.24% | 47.14B | 40.31 | $1.28 | +1.14% |
| EXPGF | $50.87 | +0.63% | 46.55B | 39.74 | $1.28 | +1.19% |
| SGSOF | $107.47 | N/A | 20.30B | 32.67 | $3.29 | +3.06% |
| SGSOY | $10.13 | -3.25% | 19.13B | 30.70 | $0.33 | +1.54% |
| BVVBY | $64.68 | +0.22% | 14.58B | 22.86 | $2.83 | +3.05% |
| BVRDF | $30.95 | -2.98% | 13.88B | 21.95 | $1.41 | +3.20% |
| BYCRF | $34.12 | +57.58% | 5.19B | 24.20 | $1.41 | +0.51% |
| CPBLF | $9.53 | N/A | 4.62B | 953.00 | $0.01 | +2.77% |
| IPSOF | $50.26 | -0.00% | 2.17B | 9.54 | $5.27 | +2.96% |
Stock Comparison
DKSHF vs EXPGY Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, EXPGY has a market cap of 47.14B. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while EXPGY trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas EXPGY's P/E ratio is 40.31. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXPGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to EXPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs EXPGF Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, EXPGF has a market cap of 46.55B. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while EXPGF trades at $50.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas EXPGF's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXPGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to EXPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs SGSOF Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, SGSOF has a market cap of 20.30B. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while SGSOF trades at $107.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas SGSOF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGSOF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to SGSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs SGSOY Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, SGSOY has a market cap of 19.13B. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while SGSOY trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas SGSOY's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGSOY's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to SGSOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs BVVBY Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, BVVBY has a market cap of 14.58B. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while BVVBY trades at $64.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas BVVBY's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BVVBY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to BVVBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs BVRDF Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, BVRDF has a market cap of 13.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while BVRDF trades at $30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas BVRDF's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BVRDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to BVRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs BYCRF Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, BYCRF has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while BYCRF trades at $34.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas BYCRF's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BYCRF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to BYCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs CPBLF Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, CPBLF has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while CPBLF trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas CPBLF's P/E ratio is 953.00. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPBLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to CPBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs IPSOF Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, IPSOF has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while IPSOF trades at $50.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas IPSOF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPSOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to IPSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs EUBG Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, EUBG has a market cap of 592.01M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while EUBG trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas EUBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EUBG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to EUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs BGPBF Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, BGPBF has a market cap of 432.98M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while BGPBF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas BGPBF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGPBF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to BGPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs RCDOF Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, RCDOF has a market cap of 170.59M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while RCDOF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas RCDOF's P/E ratio is -274.20. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to RCDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs AYAG Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, AYAG has a market cap of 126.31M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while AYAG trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas AYAG's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AYAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to AYAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs KMNCF Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, KMNCF has a market cap of 58.56M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while KMNCF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas KMNCF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMNCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to KMNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs FLCX Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, FLCX has a market cap of 49.17M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while FLCX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas FLCX's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLCX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to FLCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs MANOF Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, MANOF has a market cap of 40.14M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while MANOF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas MANOF's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MANOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to MANOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs GPLS Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, GPLS has a market cap of 6.29M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while GPLS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas GPLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPLS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to GPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs VIZC Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, VIZC has a market cap of 2.88M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while VIZC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas VIZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIZC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to VIZC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs AIMH Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, AIMH has a market cap of 2.05M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while AIMH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas AIMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIMH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to AIMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs INTO Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, INTO has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while INTO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas INTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to INTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs DFCO Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, DFCO has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while DFCO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas DFCO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DFCO's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to DFCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs ADHC Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, ADHC has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while ADHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas ADHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to ADHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs BLDV Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, BLDV has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while BLDV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas BLDV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLDV's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to BLDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs DCAC Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, DCAC has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while DCAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas DCAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to DCAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs SGDH Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, SGDH has a market cap of 553747.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while SGDH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas SGDH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGDH's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to SGDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs MRDH Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, MRDH has a market cap of 551107.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while MRDH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas MRDH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRDH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to MRDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs AERS Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, AERS has a market cap of 449602.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while AERS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas AERS's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AERS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to AERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs QPRC Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, QPRC has a market cap of 411095.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while QPRC trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas QPRC's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QPRC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to QPRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs FUGI Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, FUGI has a market cap of 280980.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while FUGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas FUGI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FUGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to FUGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs DEQI Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, DEQI has a market cap of 278535.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while DEQI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas DEQI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DEQI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to DEQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs GTVH Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, GTVH has a market cap of 212916.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while GTVH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas GTVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTVH's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to GTVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs AMMJ Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, AMMJ has a market cap of 204381.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while AMMJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas AMMJ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMMJ's ROE of +15.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to AMMJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs LGBS Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, LGBS has a market cap of 140422.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while LGBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas LGBS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LGBS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to LGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs SYNJ Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, SYNJ has a market cap of 101926.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while SYNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas SYNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYNJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to SYNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs MSYN Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, MSYN has a market cap of 87511.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while MSYN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas MSYN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSYN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to MSYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs ENCC Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, ENCC has a market cap of 81426.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while ENCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas ENCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to ENCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs CSLI Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, CSLI has a market cap of 75149.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while CSLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas CSLI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSLI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to CSLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs ITEC Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, ITEC has a market cap of 72012.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while ITEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas ITEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to ITEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs STWC Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, STWC has a market cap of 8862.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while STWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas STWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STWC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to STWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs PCHK Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, PCHK has a market cap of 352.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while PCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas PCHK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCHK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is less volatile compared to PCHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.
DKSHF vs HDST Comparison
DKSHF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DKSHF stands at 4.34B. In comparison, HDST has a market cap of 141.00. Regarding current trading prices, DKSHF is priced at $66.87, while HDST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DKSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.78, whereas HDST's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DKSHF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DKSHF is more volatile compared to HDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DKSHF.