Dalata Hotel Group plc

DHG.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DHG.IR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AC.PA has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DHG.IR is priced at €6.47, while AC.PA trades at €46.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DHG.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.17, whereas AC.PA's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, DHG.IR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AC.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DHG.IR is less volatile compared to AC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DHG.IR.

DHG.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DHG.IR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VAC.PA has a market cap of 821.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DHG.IR is priced at €6.47, while VAC.PA trades at €1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DHG.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.17, whereas VAC.PA's P/E ratio is 88.90. In terms of profitability, DHG.IR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAC.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DHG.IR is less volatile compared to VAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DHG.IR.

DHG.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DHG.IR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MLHMC.PA has a market cap of 318.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DHG.IR is priced at €6.47, while MLHMC.PA trades at €5,150.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DHG.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.17, whereas MLHMC.PA's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, DHG.IR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLHMC.PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DHG.IR is more volatile compared to MLHMC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DHG.IR.

DHG.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DHG.IR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALLHB.PA has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DHG.IR is priced at €6.47, while ALLHB.PA trades at €73.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DHG.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.17, whereas ALLHB.PA's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, DHG.IR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALLHB.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DHG.IR is more volatile compared to ALLHB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DHG.IR.

DHG.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DHG.IR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MLHOT.PA has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DHG.IR is priced at €6.47, while MLHOT.PA trades at €54.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DHG.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.17, whereas MLHOT.PA's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, DHG.IR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLHOT.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DHG.IR is more volatile compared to MLHOT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DHG.IR.

DHG.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DHG.IR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HDP.PA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DHG.IR is priced at €6.47, while HDP.PA trades at €2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DHG.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.17, whereas HDP.PA's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, DHG.IR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HDP.PA's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, DHG.IR is more volatile compared to HDP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DHG.IR.

DHG.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DHG.IR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MLHIN.PA has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DHG.IR is priced at €6.47, while MLHIN.PA trades at €212.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DHG.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.17, whereas MLHIN.PA's P/E ratio is 37.66. In terms of profitability, DHG.IR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLHIN.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DHG.IR is more volatile compared to MLHIN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DHG.IR.