DFS Furniture plc
DFS Furniture plc DFS.L Peers
See (DFS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFS.L | £174.00 | -0.57% | 401.4M | 58.00 | £0.03 | N/A |
| 0MDT.IL | £58.86 | -1.76% | 15.4B | -4.39 | -£13.40 | N/A |
| HWDN.L | £834.00 | +0.48% | 4.6B | 18.53 | £0.45 | +1.87% |
| 0N9Z.L | £37.45 | -1.32% | 505.1M | 14.57 | £2.57 | +2.77% |
| 0R6V.L | £11.30 | -0.35% | 487.7M | 10.00 | £1.13 | +7.89% |
| 0OPA.L | £17.90 | -1.92% | 467.4M | 7.87 | £2.28 | +5.01% |
| UPGS.L | £120.00 | +5.26% | 107.2M | 8.57 | £0.14 | N/A |
| VCP.L | £68.50 | -0.72% | 78.3M | -0.34 | -£2.02 | N/A |
| HEAD.L | £87.80 | +1.15% | 70.5M | -2.83 | -£0.31 | N/A |
| LIKE.L | £25.50 | +0.00% | 62.3M | -25.50 | -£0.01 | +1.47% |
Stock Comparison
DFS.L vs 0MDT.IL Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, 0MDT.IL has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while 0MDT.IL trades at £58.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas 0MDT.IL's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0MDT.IL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is more volatile compared to 0MDT.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs HWDN.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, HWDN.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while HWDN.L trades at £834.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas HWDN.L's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HWDN.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is more volatile compared to HWDN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs 0N9Z.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, 0N9Z.L has a market cap of 505.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while 0N9Z.L trades at £37.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas 0N9Z.L's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0N9Z.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is more volatile compared to 0N9Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs 0R6V.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, 0R6V.L has a market cap of 487.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while 0R6V.L trades at £11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas 0R6V.L's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0R6V.L's ROE of +9.99%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is more volatile compared to 0R6V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs 0OPA.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, 0OPA.L has a market cap of 467.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while 0OPA.L trades at £17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas 0OPA.L's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0OPA.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is more volatile compared to 0OPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs UPGS.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, UPGS.L has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while UPGS.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas UPGS.L's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UPGS.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. DFS.L has daily volatility of 2.16 and UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A.
DFS.L vs VCP.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, VCP.L has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while VCP.L trades at £68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas VCP.L's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VCP.L's ROE of +2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is less volatile compared to VCP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs HEAD.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, HEAD.L has a market cap of 70.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while HEAD.L trades at £87.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas HEAD.L's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HEAD.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is less volatile compared to HEAD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs LIKE.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, LIKE.L has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while LIKE.L trades at £25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas LIKE.L's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIKE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is more volatile compared to LIKE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs ULTP.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, ULTP.L has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while ULTP.L trades at £61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas ULTP.L's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ULTP.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is less volatile compared to ULTP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs CHH.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, CHH.L has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while CHH.L trades at £430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas CHH.L's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is less volatile compared to CHH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs CFX.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, CFX.L has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while CFX.L trades at £760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas CFX.L's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFX.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is more volatile compared to CFX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs SDG.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, SDG.L has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while SDG.L trades at £52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas SDG.L's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SDG.L's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is less volatile compared to SDG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs PMP.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, PMP.L has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while PMP.L trades at £138.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas PMP.L's P/E ratio is 69.25. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PMP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is more volatile compared to PMP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs JLH.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, JLH.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while JLH.L trades at £1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas JLH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JLH.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS.L is more volatile compared to JLH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.L.
DFS.L vs EVE.L Comparison
DFS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFS.L stands at 401.4M. In comparison, EVE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS.L is priced at £174.00, while EVE.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas EVE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVE.L's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. DFS.L has daily volatility of 2.16 and EVE.L has daily volatility of N/A.