DFI Retail Group Holdings Limited
DFI Retail Group Holdings Limited DFIB.L Peers
See (DFIB.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFIB.L | $9.17 | +100.00% | 3.70B | -50.94 | -$0.18 | +3.90% |
| 0R1O.IL | $205.30 | +0.20% | 2.18T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0JVQ.L | $235.76 | +0.89% | 131.96B | 19.15 | $12.31 | +1.96% |
| 0K0E.L | $2,595.10 | +0.02% | 131.56B | 710.79 | $3.65 | N/A |
| 0KAB.L | $1,389.51 | +0.80% | 79.19B | 44.47 | $31.25 | N/A |
| 0HJL.L | $3,880.00 | +2.90% | 64.91B | 34.25 | $113.30 | N/A |
| 0KXO.L | $153.87 | +0.75% | 50.60B | 34.19 | $4.50 | +0.98% |
| 0LD8.L | $97.85 | -0.94% | 44.46B | 8.08 | $12.11 | +4.59% |
| 0R3D.L | $71.80 | +0.14% | 33.09B | 18.21 | $3.94 | +1.53% |
| 0IC7.L | $97.89 | +5.20% | 21.53B | 10.04 | $9.75 | +2.41% |
Stock Comparison
DFIB.L vs 0R1O.IL Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0R1O.IL has a market cap of 2.18T. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0R1O.IL trades at $205.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0R1O.IL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0R1O.IL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0R1O.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0JVQ.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0JVQ.L has a market cap of 131.96B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0JVQ.L trades at $235.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0JVQ.L's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0JVQ.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0JVQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0K0E.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0K0E.L has a market cap of 131.56B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0K0E.L trades at $2,595.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0K0E.L's P/E ratio is 710.79. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0K0E.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0K0E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0KAB.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0KAB.L has a market cap of 79.19B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0KAB.L trades at $1,389.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0KAB.L's P/E ratio is 44.47. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0KAB.L's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0KAB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0HJL.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0HJL.L has a market cap of 64.91B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0HJL.L trades at $3,880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0HJL.L's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0HJL.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0HJL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0KXO.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0KXO.L has a market cap of 50.60B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0KXO.L trades at $153.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0KXO.L's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0KXO.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0KXO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0LD8.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0LD8.L has a market cap of 44.46B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0LD8.L trades at $97.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0LD8.L's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0LD8.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0LD8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0R3D.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0R3D.L has a market cap of 33.09B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0R3D.L trades at $71.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0R3D.L's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0R3D.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0R3D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0IC7.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0IC7.L has a market cap of 21.53B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0IC7.L trades at $97.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0IC7.L's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0IC7.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0IC7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0LXC.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0LXC.L has a market cap of 21.48B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0LXC.L trades at $174.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0LXC.L's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0LXC.L's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0LXC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0LIB.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0LIB.L has a market cap of 18.57B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0LIB.L trades at $411.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0LIB.L's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0LIB.L's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0LIB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0IC8.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0IC8.L has a market cap of 18.27B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0IC8.L trades at $86.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0IC8.L's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0IC8.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0IC8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0IUX.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0IUX.L has a market cap of 17.84B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0IUX.L trades at $128.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0IUX.L's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0IUX.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0IUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0R18.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0R18.L has a market cap of 15.19B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0R18.L trades at $71.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0R18.L's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0R18.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0R18.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0HTQ.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0HTQ.L has a market cap of 10.22B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0HTQ.L trades at $67.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0HTQ.L's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0HTQ.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0HTQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0QVE.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0QVE.L has a market cap of 8.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0QVE.L trades at $593.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0QVE.L's P/E ratio is 133.38. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0QVE.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0QVE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0JSC.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0JSC.L has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0JSC.L trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0JSC.L's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0JSC.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0JSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0RCW.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0RCW.L has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0RCW.L trades at $152.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0RCW.L's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0RCW.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0RCW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0IPD.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0IPD.L has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0IPD.L trades at $108.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0IPD.L's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0IPD.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0IPD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0IIW.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0IIW.L has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0IIW.L trades at $46.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0IIW.L's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0IIW.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0IIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0SOM.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0SOM.L has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0SOM.L trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0SOM.L's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0SOM.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0SOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs JD.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, JD.L has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while JD.L trades at $91.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas JD.L's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to JD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0R32.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0R32.L has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0R32.L trades at $78.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0R32.L's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0R32.L's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0R32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0KTF.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0KTF.L has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0KTF.L trades at $202.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0KTF.L's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0KTF.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0KTF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs FRAS.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, FRAS.L has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while FRAS.L trades at $714.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas FRAS.L's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FRAS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to FRAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs ROO.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, ROO.L has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while ROO.L trades at $174.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas ROO.L's P/E ratio is 58.30. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ROO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to ROO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs DNLM.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, DNLM.L has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while DNLM.L trades at $1,205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas DNLM.L's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DNLM.L's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to DNLM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs JET.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, JET.L has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while JET.L trades at $1,134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas JET.L's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JET.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to JET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0IQK.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0IQK.L has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0IQK.L trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0IQK.L's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0IQK.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0IQK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0H9G.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0H9G.L has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0H9G.L trades at $34.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0H9G.L's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0H9G.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0H9G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0QK3.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0QK3.L has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0QK3.L trades at $35.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0QK3.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0QK3.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0QK3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0HSU.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0HSU.L has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0HSU.L trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0HSU.L's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0HSU.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0HSU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs CURY.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, CURY.L has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while CURY.L trades at $123.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas CURY.L's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CURY.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to CURY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs SMWH.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, SMWH.L has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while SMWH.L trades at $1,026.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas SMWH.L's P/E ratio is 205.20. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SMWH.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to SMWH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs PETS.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, PETS.L has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while PETS.L trades at $255.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas PETS.L's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PETS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to PETS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0JRL.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0JRL.L has a market cap of 950.46M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0JRL.L trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0JRL.L's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0JRL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0JRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs MOON.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, MOON.L has a market cap of 843.33M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while MOON.L trades at $253.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas MOON.L's P/E ratio is -42.25. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MOON.L's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to MOON.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs AO.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, AO.L has a market cap of 592.82M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while AO.L trades at $104.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas AO.L's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to AO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs ASC.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, ASC.L has a market cap of 379.01M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while ASC.L trades at $318.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas ASC.L's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ASC.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to ASC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0KDU.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0KDU.L has a market cap of 378.09M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0KDU.L trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0KDU.L's P/E ratio is 0.82. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0KDU.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0KDU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs BOO.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, BOO.L has a market cap of 364.67M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while BOO.L trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas BOO.L's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BOO.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to BOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs THG.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, THG.L has a market cap of 361.58M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while THG.L trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas THG.L's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to THG.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to THG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs HFD.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, HFD.L has a market cap of 360.40M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while HFD.L trades at $165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas HFD.L's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HFD.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to HFD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0RA5.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0RA5.L has a market cap of 342.60M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0RA5.L trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0RA5.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0RA5.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L and 0RA5.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DFIB.L vs CARD.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, CARD.L has a market cap of 332.85M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while CARD.L trades at $95.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas CARD.L's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CARD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to CARD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs DEBS.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, DEBS.L has a market cap of 305.29M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while DEBS.L trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas DEBS.L's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DEBS.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to DEBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0ROF.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0ROF.L has a market cap of 229.40M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0ROF.L trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0ROF.L's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0ROF.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0ROF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs BWNG.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, BWNG.L has a market cap of 185.29M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while BWNG.L trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas BWNG.L's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BWNG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to BWNG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0OQX.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0OQX.L has a market cap of 123.91M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0OQX.L trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0OQX.L's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0OQX.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L and 0OQX.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DFIB.L vs SCS.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, SCS.L has a market cap of 95.56M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while SCS.L trades at $270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas SCS.L's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SCS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L and SCS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DFIB.L vs 0RP3.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0RP3.L has a market cap of 84.33M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0RP3.L trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0RP3.L's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0RP3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to 0RP3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs MRK.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, MRK.L has a market cap of 61.40M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while MRK.L trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas MRK.L's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MRK.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to MRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs IGR.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, IGR.L has a market cap of 60.80M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while IGR.L trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas IGR.L's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IGR.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to IGR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs PROC.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, PROC.L has a market cap of 41.40M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while PROC.L trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas PROC.L's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PROC.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to PROC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs G4M.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, G4M.L has a market cap of 35.66M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while G4M.L trades at $170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas G4M.L's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to G4M.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to G4M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs ANG.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, ANG.L has a market cap of 30.82M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while ANG.L trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas ANG.L's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ANG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to ANG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs HRN.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, HRN.L has a market cap of 26.65M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while HRN.L trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas HRN.L's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HRN.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to HRN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs SOS.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, SOS.L has a market cap of 23.58M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while SOS.L trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas SOS.L's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SOS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to SOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs WRKS.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, WRKS.L has a market cap of 18.75M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while WRKS.L trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas WRKS.L's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WRKS.L's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to WRKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs MTC.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, MTC.L has a market cap of 16.91M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while MTC.L trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas MTC.L's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MTC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to MTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs PODP.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, PODP.L has a market cap of 9.54M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while PODP.L trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas PODP.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PODP.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L and PODP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DFIB.L vs MMAG.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, MMAG.L has a market cap of 8.83M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while MMAG.L trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas MMAG.L's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MMAG.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L and MMAG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DFIB.L vs SCHO.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, SCHO.L has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while SCHO.L trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas SCHO.L's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SCHO.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L is less volatile compared to SCHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFIB.L.
DFIB.L vs 0DQK.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0DQK.L has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0DQK.L trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0DQK.L's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0DQK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L and 0DQK.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DFIB.L vs DISP.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, DISP.L has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while DISP.L trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas DISP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DISP.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L and DISP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DFIB.L vs UBG.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, UBG.L has a market cap of 488670.00. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while UBG.L trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas UBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UBG.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L and UBG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DFIB.L vs ITS.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, ITS.L has a market cap of 406875.00. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while ITS.L trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas ITS.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ITS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L and ITS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DFIB.L vs 0IJU.L Comparison
DFIB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DFIB.L stands at 3.70B. In comparison, 0IJU.L has a market cap of 749.00. Regarding current trading prices, DFIB.L is priced at $9.17, while 0IJU.L trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DFIB.L currently has a P/E ratio of -50.94, whereas 0IJU.L's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, DFIB.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0IJU.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, DFIB.L and 0IJU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).